The same woman who, half an hour ago, said "The American people deserve TRANSPARENCY and HONESTY" is refusing to answer possibly the most important question of the entire debate.
Notice how she took long pauses, and seemed to use up the two minutes with as little content as possible? I think they went in there trying to bullshit the whole thing by answering no questions with this strategy, and cutting pence off short with the time limit. I think this is a big reason Pence used his time for the next question to go back and answer the remainder of the previous one.
eh, not so much suburban moms. Mothers tend to be quite a bit more conservative than unmarried women of the same age group (though more liberal than men in the same age group). Suburban lonely cat ladies, though, are pretty universally liberal and eat that type of stuff up.
For those of us that watched horror movies from the '70s, it's pretty fucking hilarious.
(Do people realize that those weren't akshually just bigotry, but based on real cases of transgenderism forced as a form of Munchhausen by proxy that ended with women being made into chairs? It's part of why more modern generations never even flirted with that stuff, when prior generations used to dress all babies as girls; some women kept it going too long, and it created violent criminals.)
... Look, if I didn't laugh I'd cry, so I choose to find it funny instead.
Let's be clear, the Supreme Court is going to strike down any attempt to pack their own court seeing as it takes away the three co-equal branches of the Government. It would then only be the two co-equal branches of Gov.
I do not see this happening, they are trying to gin up their base with what they know is a lie. They would love to do it, but understand 1.) It will be struck down 9-0. 2.) The backlash would be so bad Dems may never get elected again, AND the Republicans would then just repack it, and OVERTURN all the bad rulings.
It's a silly idea, and IMHO, its just a gimmick to gin up their base.
Just get rid of the crazy protesters and the hysterical SJW. They are the missing link. Scientifically evidenced fact through their acts and video footage.
I just stated, the Supreme Court is not going to allow them to pack THEIR COURT. Its pretty simple. Who would decide it? Who knows that? Dems, so why are they saying it? To gin up their left-wing nut jobs to come out and vote,
The backlash would be so bad Dems may never get elected again, AND the Republicans would then just repack it,
There's one flaw in this theory; if the Left ever regains full control of the Federal government, between flooding the country with millions of new third-world "instant citizens", nationwide ballot harvesting, and nationwide vote-by-mail, they will put themselves in a position of power from which they can never be voted out regardless of the level of backlash from regular working-class Americans.
Look at the constant attempts since 2016 to overturn Trump's presidency and avoid relinquishing power. IF they are allowed to take power again, making change peacefully via the ballot box is finished; they will not let it go without bloodshed.
Correct. We must all read Gulag Archipelago to understand Bolshevism. The West operated under a mistaken belief at Yalta that the Russians could vote their way out of it. Commies don’t allow that. It’s a totalitarian system and they know best so they need to run it.
There are SIMPLETONS all throughout the USA who are currently deceived by these clown Dems and the Media who are not going to allow unfairness. As per the Supreme Court, they are not going to allow the Supreme Court to be packed, they are the ones who decide. Its not going to ever happen, they are just ginning up their base.
The conduct of the Democrats during the last four years alone should be reason enough for a Democrat to never get elected for years to come, but here we are.
The irony is that was her answer to the question about health transparency. Biden hasn't been transparent about anything health related, including drug-tests or cognitive tests.
Many times she looked worried in the debate and this was one of them. She had a good start with the coronavirus because literally no administration in history has had to deal with an intentional infection (by China or anyone). During Chinese New Year when this began she said go to Chinatown without a mask to celebrate, or else you are a racist xenophobe.
Yeah they never bring up the Cuomo Whitmer Newsome Wolfe mass executions that inflated the numbers so that better mean it’s being handled behind the scenes for some indictments.
Because if they do manage to win they will say that means the people want them to stack the court. If they straight up say they won’t do it and then do it anyway right after winning a lot of moderate democrats that voted for them would be super pissed. This way they can say hey this is what they voted for even though likely 2/3rds+ of the country doesn’t want more justices added.
"Moderate" Democrats are like "moderate" Islam. They may not have the motivation to pick up the knife and put it to your throat themselves but they're not going to object when the extremist saws your head off.
Managing immediate fact-checks and correspondence through social media and more by this team means highest energy. The MAGA team is on top of it and no stone left unground. Every strategic post across the field filled with A team assets.
If any wonder what it means to be high energy, take in that being always on post, never sleeping, always ready to respond with appropriate action is the key.
Others in opposition don't have the resources, ambition, gumption.
Our immediate responses are our strongest tools. When they lie and we let it slide we lose ground.
Now we're learning to punch back and to always be ready. Trump teaching the GOP how to win is something I preached to a friend four years ago and I firmly feel I've been backed up with references to show.
DEMS- "Trump and Republicans better not do their required duty of advise and consent of one Justice to fill an empty seat."
Also DEMS--"We'll violate the laws, and pack the court with lots of justices!"
DEMOCRACY PARTY = "working hard" every day to destroy our REPUBLIC and destroy our CONSTITUTION every way possible. Our Constitution, which they take an OATH to UPHOLD... Dem liars and Oathbreakers.
"Not all Democrats are horse thieves, but all horse thieves are Democrats."--(I think it was FDRs Republican father in law.)
Oh what if we had like 21 Judges. Seriously tho, can we not just try and pack the court when we have the majority and force the Dems to sign an amendment to limit the number of judges.
[Redpill] In case you don't know, this devils bargain and Constitutional blackmail was already done by the Marxist Dems. Here's the history lesson so it's not repeated. But this is what allowed globalist & Marxist Dictator FDR to get his way, including the double dip in the Great Depression, New Deal expansion, FDR's 3rd and 4th terms, and manuevering the US including WW2 ( by FDR giving the green light to Britian/France), thus spreading Marxism everywhere.
which basically tell the Courts to not do their job, and kick the can to let unconstitutional laws/reasons stand.
Make the Supreme Court Great Again! Strike down the unconstitutional, lazy, evil Marxist Ashwander Rules, which has intentionally allowed all this anti-Constitutional crud to build up in our law.
PS This is why we need non-cowards on the Supreme Court.
How the hell can they claim to represent the moral high ground when they’re afraid to affirmatively state what their policies and intentions are? POTUS says exactly what he’s going to do, months in advance, on twitter for the whole world to see.
Pence won, hands down.
Camel Hairs just sat there and lied about not banning fracking and refused to answer the "packing SCOTUS" question.
Electric Pence just came off as more trusting of American citizens.
Camel Hairs entire pitch was nothing but non-stop "Orange Man Bad" and pie-in-the-sky ideas with no actual details and Americans are tired of hearing that shit day in and day out.
Not much they can do. Its 9 now because of a regular law from the 1800s. Only thing that can be done to set the number permanently is a Constitutional amendment, and that isn't going to pass.
There's already a bill that limits seats (Judiciary Act of 1869). And neither party has the numbers to repeal it and pass a new one, so there's nothing to be done.
SHE WANTS TO WIN SO BAD! BUT SHE CANT BULLY HER WAY IN TO THEVICE PRESIDENCY. MRPENCE CALMNESS AND COMPOSURE DEVOUREDHER ALIVE. SHE TRIED LAUGHING IT OFF, BUT SHE ENDED LOOKING LIKEAN IDIOT. IT'S SO HARD NOT TO LAUGH. 😂😂😂
The other option is; 1) they are not answering it as a threat, to try and make republicans consider appointing pre-election 2) Meanwhile they turn it into an election issue and pull the rug right before election and say 'we wont do that and was just made up stuff by you' so it swings voters back that felt this was an issue and serves as a distraction from bigger weaknesses in the leadup.
This is probably too strategic and they simply plan to pack the courts but you have to consider if this is a good attack point, against many.
They 100% thought the debates weren't going to happen after Trump caught the flu. She wasn't preped beforehand and I doubt she got any practice in as it really showed.
She looked really nervous and looked like someone who thought they would be sitting at home.
Of course Joe Biden won't personally attend the next debate because that’s what they planned on doing. When the Democrats can’t get their way they will change the rules to push their leftist agenda. They’re not even pretending anymore.
Why won’t the Dems answer the question about Court packing? Isn’t that part of what we are voting on? Where is the media “outrage” about changing a 150 year institution because you couldn’t win elections? Remember elections have consequences.
If they pack the court and eliminate the filibuster, then the next time the Republicans control the House+Senate+President, they'll re-pack the court, and then repeal every single bad law.
Republicans of 2015 wouldn't have the balls to do that, but in the future, who knows?
The same woman who, half an hour ago, said "The American people deserve TRANSPARENCY and HONESTY" is refusing to answer possibly the most important question of the entire debate.
Notice how she took long pauses, and seemed to use up the two minutes with as little content as possible? I think they went in there trying to bullshit the whole thing by answering no questions with this strategy, and cutting pence off short with the time limit. I think this is a big reason Pence used his time for the next question to go back and answer the remainder of the previous one.
Did you perhaps mean Joe, not Mike? I know it's easy to make the mistake. Big Mike was the manliest one in the Obama Administration.
>"Yes lets talk about packing the court"
*>proceeds to not talk about packing the court
In 1864,
**four score and seven years ago, Corn Pop taught me about roaches
eh, not so much suburban moms. Mothers tend to be quite a bit more conservative than unmarried women of the same age group (though more liberal than men in the same age group). Suburban lonely cat ladies, though, are pretty universally liberal and eat that type of stuff up.
That is quite disgusting. Glad my area isn't like that.
For those of us that watched horror movies from the '70s, it's pretty fucking hilarious.
(Do people realize that those weren't akshually just bigotry, but based on real cases of transgenderism forced as a form of Munchhausen by proxy that ended with women being made into chairs? It's part of why more modern generations never even flirted with that stuff, when prior generations used to dress all babies as girls; some women kept it going too long, and it created violent criminals.)
... Look, if I didn't laugh I'd cry, so I choose to find it funny instead.
It must suck to live near you.
Let's be clear, the Supreme Court is going to strike down any attempt to pack their own court seeing as it takes away the three co-equal branches of the Government. It would then only be the two co-equal branches of Gov.
I do not see this happening, they are trying to gin up their base with what they know is a lie. They would love to do it, but understand 1.) It will be struck down 9-0. 2.) The backlash would be so bad Dems may never get elected again, AND the Republicans would then just repack it, and OVERTURN all the bad rulings.
It's a silly idea, and IMHO, its just a gimmick to gin up their base.
You forgot committing economic suicide for a flu like illness, and causing untold mental harm on so many.
based post
Just get rid of the crazy protesters and the hysterical SJW. They are the missing link. Scientifically evidenced fact through their acts and video footage.
I just stated, the Supreme Court is not going to allow them to pack THEIR COURT. Its pretty simple. Who would decide it? Who knows that? Dems, so why are they saying it? To gin up their left-wing nut jobs to come out and vote,
Eugenics huh I know it's tongue in cheek but dancing along a razors edge there
There's one flaw in this theory; if the Left ever regains full control of the Federal government, between flooding the country with millions of new third-world "instant citizens", nationwide ballot harvesting, and nationwide vote-by-mail, they will put themselves in a position of power from which they can never be voted out regardless of the level of backlash from regular working-class Americans.
Look at the constant attempts since 2016 to overturn Trump's presidency and avoid relinquishing power. IF they are allowed to take power again, making change peacefully via the ballot box is finished; they will not let it go without bloodshed.
Correct. We must all read Gulag Archipelago to understand Bolshevism. The West operated under a mistaken belief at Yalta that the Russians could vote their way out of it. Commies don’t allow that. It’s a totalitarian system and they know best so they need to run it.
There are SIMPLETONS all throughout the USA who are currently deceived by these clown Dems and the Media who are not going to allow unfairness. As per the Supreme Court, they are not going to allow the Supreme Court to be packed, they are the ones who decide. Its not going to ever happen, they are just ginning up their base.
The conduct of the Democrats during the last four years alone should be reason enough for a Democrat to never get elected for years to come, but here we are.
As is tradition.
The irony is that was her answer to the question about health transparency. Biden hasn't been transparent about anything health related, including drug-tests or cognitive tests.
MY SIDES, WHEN PENCE LOOKED INTO THE CAMERA AND SMILED AND SAID "By the way she never answered the question" HOLY FUCKING KEK.
"for the record" of course. Signed, the Silver Fox. ;)
"But I think Americans already know the answer."
Very good response on his part to her dodging.
that dodge alone got us 2% of the vote.
That was my favorite part of the debate
Can I get a link to that?
Many times she looked worried in the debate and this was one of them. She had a good start with the coronavirus because literally no administration in history has had to deal with an intentional infection (by China or anyone). During Chinese New Year when this began she said go to Chinatown without a mask to celebrate, or else you are a racist xenophobe.
I thought that was Nancy
Yeah they never bring up the Cuomo Whitmer Newsome Wolfe mass executions that inflated the numbers so that better mean it’s being handled behind the scenes for some indictments.
Remember when they said 2 million in America would die this year? I do...
Exactly. The number is 200k who died presumably with COVID -- and not from the virus; nor is testing positive for the virus certain at time of death.
Na, she was at he best In the middle. I'm saying that because it was the only part VP Pence didn't run over, back up, then run over Sen. Harris again
I’m sure she just did irreparable damage to Biden there. It was obvious she didn’t answer the question, at least Biden had the sense to ignore it.
"She just lost the Left"
Kamala was speechless. This was the moment Pence won.
Because if they do manage to win they will say that means the people want them to stack the court. If they straight up say they won’t do it and then do it anyway right after winning a lot of moderate democrats that voted for them would be super pissed. This way they can say hey this is what they voted for even though likely 2/3rds+ of the country doesn’t want more justices added.
"Moderate" Democrats are like "moderate" Islam. They may not have the motivation to pick up the knife and put it to your throat themselves but they're not going to object when the extremist saws your head off.
Some sense, thank you
President Trump should just say that's their intention as a matter of fact.
Make them deny it
he has in pressers
Jesus Christ he totally broke her
Pence: WILL YOU PACK THE COURTS YES OR NO
Kamala: You see lets look at what honest Abe... You didn't appoint a black judge!
lmao those were so much fun
i hope trump suplexes biden in the townhall
what a terrible few minutes for her. IT WAS A FUCKING KILL SHOT.
She never got her footing back.
Pence got em good.
So when Trump wins, Dims are fine with packing the court?
Managing immediate fact-checks and correspondence through social media and more by this team means highest energy. The MAGA team is on top of it and no stone left unground. Every strategic post across the field filled with A team assets.
If any wonder what it means to be high energy, take in that being always on post, never sleeping, always ready to respond with appropriate action is the key.
Others in opposition don't have the resources, ambition, gumption.
Our immediate responses are our strongest tools. When they lie and we let it slide we lose ground.
Now we're learning to punch back and to always be ready. Trump teaching the GOP how to win is something I preached to a friend four years ago and I firmly feel I've been backed up with references to show.
It would have been epic if Pence just kept offering her another 2 minutes to answer the question after she continued to dodge it.
"Moderator, I know we're out of time and I'm losing, but is there a cock I can suck to make up for it?"
DEMS- "Trump and Republicans better not do their required duty of advise and consent of one Justice to fill an empty seat."
Also DEMS--"We'll violate the laws, and pack the court with lots of justices!"
DEMOCRACY PARTY = "working hard" every day to destroy our REPUBLIC and destroy our CONSTITUTION every way possible. Our Constitution, which they take an OATH to UPHOLD... Dem liars and Oathbreakers.
"Not all Democrats are horse thieves, but all horse thieves are Democrats."--(I think it was FDRs Republican father in law.)
Oh what if we had like 21 Judges. Seriously tho, can we not just try and pack the court when we have the majority and force the Dems to sign an amendment to limit the number of judges.
[Redpill] In case you don't know, this devils bargain and Constitutional blackmail was already done by the Marxist Dems. Here's the history lesson so it's not repeated. But this is what allowed globalist & Marxist Dictator FDR to get his way, including the double dip in the Great Depression, New Deal expansion, FDR's 3rd and 4th terms, and manuevering the US including WW2 ( by FDR giving the green light to Britian/France), thus spreading Marxism everywhere.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_switch_in_time_that_saved_nine
And in case you also don't know, this is imo the worst member of the Court in our history, Marxist:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Brandeis
who wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashwander_rules
which basically tell the Courts to not do their job, and kick the can to let unconstitutional laws/reasons stand.
Make the Supreme Court Great Again! Strike down the unconstitutional, lazy, evil Marxist Ashwander Rules, which has intentionally allowed all this anti-Constitutional crud to build up in our law.
PS This is why we need non-cowards on the Supreme Court.
Absolutely they will pack the court. In a meeting today one of them admitted it in a hushed tone to, he claimed, to "restore a balance of power."
It’s funny when they were in the majority on the SCOTUS there was never talk of balance on the court.
Kamala or Joe will never answer the question!
Disingenuous Biatch! good that she was BTFOed by Pence tonight. Never knew he was a Sithmaster, though his forcelightning was on point.
You never knew? Sheeeeiiit that's the Silver Fox 🦊
How the hell can they claim to represent the moral high ground when they’re afraid to affirmatively state what their policies and intentions are? POTUS says exactly what he’s going to do, months in advance, on twitter for the whole world to see.
Talk about transparency, jeez!
Pence won, hands down.
Camel Hairs just sat there and lied about not banning fracking and refused to answer the "packing SCOTUS" question.
Electric Pence just came off as more trusting of American citizens.
Camel Hairs entire pitch was nothing but non-stop "Orange Man Bad" and pie-in-the-sky ideas with no actual details and Americans are tired of hearing that shit day in and day out.
Not much they can do. Its 9 now because of a regular law from the 1800s. Only thing that can be done to set the number permanently is a Constitutional amendment, and that isn't going to pass.
There's already a bill that limits seats (Judiciary Act of 1869). And neither party has the numbers to repeal it and pass a new one, so there's nothing to be done.
It's interesting that they can lie about everything during a debate but refuse to answer certain questions
They don't just plan to pack the court. They plan to pack the senate.
Except, she is pretending. That's why she won't admit it.
If she had no intention of doing it, she's say so. If she had intention of doing it but didn't think America voters would mind, she's admit it.
But she doesn't admit it because she is going to and she knows Americans would be against it.
SHE WANTS TO WIN SO BAD! BUT SHE CANT BULLY HER WAY IN TO THE VICE PRESIDENCY. MRPENCE CALMNESS AND COMPOSURE DEVOURED HER ALIVE. SHE TRIED LAUGHING IT OFF, BUT SHE ENDED LOOKING LIKE AN IDIOT. IT'S SO HARD NOT TO LAUGH. 😂😂😂
What is this packing the court thing and how is it possible? It's not in the Constitution limiting it to 9 Justices?
No. Congress determines the amount. Since 1869 or so, the number has been 9.
"will you pack the court" is a really easy question to answer, unless the answer is yes.
The other option is; 1) they are not answering it as a threat, to try and make republicans consider appointing pre-election 2) Meanwhile they turn it into an election issue and pull the rug right before election and say 'we wont do that and was just made up stuff by you' so it swings voters back that felt this was an issue and serves as a distraction from bigger weaknesses in the leadup.
This is probably too strategic and they simply plan to pack the courts but you have to consider if this is a good attack point, against many.
They 100% thought the debates weren't going to happen after Trump caught the flu. She wasn't preped beforehand and I doubt she got any practice in as it really showed.
She looked really nervous and looked like someone who thought they would be sitting at home.
HONK HONK
Of course Joe Biden won't personally attend the next debate because that’s what they planned on doing. When the Democrats can’t get their way they will change the rules to push their leftist agenda. They’re not even pretending anymore.
I’m not a fan of court packing
I didn’t like when AZ republicans did it a few years ago, I don’t like Biden/Harris threatening it now.
Why won’t the Dems answer the question about Court packing? Isn’t that part of what we are voting on? Where is the media “outrage” about changing a 150 year institution because you couldn’t win elections? Remember elections have consequences.
The Trump campaign needs to make this a big issue.
Pack the courts and give vote to 20 million illegals. Disband the constitution and a permanent majority.
Venezuela 2.0
To be fair, I am not convinced Kamala Harris knows about any plans to do anything and can't answer such questions anyways.
Obama stacked the SES and that has not been fixed. The courts are worthless without the co-operation of the SES
That's not the only thing she's thinking about packing...😉
who cares, Now, I know Kamala's momma was 25 years old when she was born. I have no idea how old Trump's mom was when he was born.
If they pack the court and eliminate the filibuster, then the next time the Republicans control the House+Senate+President, they'll re-pack the court, and then repeal every single bad law.
Republicans of 2015 wouldn't have the balls to do that, but in the future, who knows?
You're assuming there would be any elections after that point.