She moderated well, I'll give her that. But OANN noted that her questions were more pointed and accusatory toward Pence. Harris only got soft subjects and questions. One of those subjects should've been her flip-flopping and accusing her own running mate of being essentially a racist during the primaries. In the future, R's need to refuse to do debates that don't have at least one debate with a based moderator. If the dems refuse, then put it back on them. Tell them "we'll do a debate or two with liberal moderators but one of those debates must be with a person like Tucker."
No she didn’t. She gave Harris the last word every time Harris asked, and when she gave pence a response she still allowed Kamala an additional response
Granted, she wasn't perfect, but she "moderated" rather than enflaming the situation or debating one of the candidates. Chris Wallace destroyed that Presidential Debate.
She was reading the questions on a teleprompter. I doubt she wrote any of it. I liked her mannerisms. MUCH MUCH MUCH better than Wallace, who actually took up the topics and debated Trump. It was obscene.
Agreed. It was just good enough that it didn't turn into a complete shitshow. That was my takeaway and we forget about all the normies out there who respond to that. This time, they probably didn't turn the TV off in the first 15 minutes and really got to hear both of them speak, especially The Silver Fox. And they also got a good look at how phony, disingenuous, and cringey Harris is.
i think she was equally as bad as wallace if not worse,.....the main difference was pence absolutely slayed all night long while remaining calm and poised even though the whole thing was stacked against him (question phrasing and the mod cutting him off over and over when time was up and warning camel-a once and then letting her finish without interrupting....plus we all know the mods have been practicing these questions with the dems for weeks if not months)
Are you kidding? Wallace set the tempo of the debate and was obviously trying to rattle Trump. Susan Page was only slightly on the biased side. I thought she did admirably compared to Chris Wallace.. I hate that bastard.
You didn't see the same debate that I did. Wallace was pointedly arguing with POTUS and reenforcing the points of Biden. His first few questions were tailored to enrage Trump and put him on the defensive. I'm not sure how anyone could have missed that.
The only thing she did better was not yelling over Pence like that cuck faggot Wallace. Her questions were incredibly partisan and derogatory to the Trump-Pence administration. If she was remotely fair, she would've asked Harris how she felt about her running mate now since not long ago she called him a racist and a sexual predator. She could've asked about Russiagate or Biden's dealings in Ukraine and China or where is Hunter. But they won't go there because it exposes the fact they're criminal scum
Wallace is a duche. Hard to say this but the moderator was fair tonight. Even good. Pence had to ask the tough questions but she made Wallace look like a three year old.
She sucked & her questions sucked.
She moderated well, I'll give her that. But OANN noted that her questions were more pointed and accusatory toward Pence. Harris only got soft subjects and questions. One of those subjects should've been her flip-flopping and accusing her own running mate of being essentially a racist during the primaries. In the future, R's need to refuse to do debates that don't have at least one debate with a based moderator. If the dems refuse, then put it back on them. Tell them "we'll do a debate or two with liberal moderators but one of those debates must be with a person like Tucker."
No she didn’t. She gave Harris the last word every time Harris asked, and when she gave pence a response she still allowed Kamala an additional response
Granted, she wasn't perfect, but she "moderated" rather than enflaming the situation or debating one of the candidates. Chris Wallace destroyed that Presidential Debate.
She was reading the questions on a teleprompter. I doubt she wrote any of it. I liked her mannerisms. MUCH MUCH MUCH better than Wallace, who actually took up the topics and debated Trump. It was obscene.
Agreed. It was just good enough that it didn't turn into a complete shitshow. That was my takeaway and we forget about all the normies out there who respond to that. This time, they probably didn't turn the TV off in the first 15 minutes and really got to hear both of them speak, especially The Silver Fox. And they also got a good look at how phony, disingenuous, and cringey Harris is.
Great points
that last question - WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY ABOUT TRUMP NOT COMMITTING TO A PEACEFUL TRANSITION OF POWER!?!?!?!?
fucking spooky from harris- we have a coalition
DEEP STATE TRAITORS!
she was very thankful for his lengthy responses.
VGEOTUS does have that effect on people.
I was half expecting him to say "you're welcome!" And then continue on with his point.
Better than Wally. Pretty low standard.
She was better than Wallace but still a typical liberal moderator.
i think she was equally as bad as wallace if not worse,.....the main difference was pence absolutely slayed all night long while remaining calm and poised even though the whole thing was stacked against him (question phrasing and the mod cutting him off over and over when time was up and warning camel-a once and then letting her finish without interrupting....plus we all know the mods have been practicing these questions with the dems for weeks if not months)
She did better but no way. She pulled a Wallace with her "I didn't make these rules" spat.
Aren't all rules made up? Seriously though, the campaigns did agree to the rules.
It was ...... 2 on 1
she was actually decent besides right before the last question when she gave Harris 30 seconds which turned into well over a minute
The only thing she did better was allow time for rebuttal. It prevented the back and forth interruptions that took place with Trump and Biden
Are you kidding? Wallace set the tempo of the debate and was obviously trying to rattle Trump. Susan Page was only slightly on the biased side. I thought she did admirably compared to Chris Wallace.. I hate that bastard.
If Wallace would have given 30 seconds to respond, none of his theatrics would have been necessary.
It was the crux of the matter.
You didn't see the same debate that I did. Wallace was pointedly arguing with POTUS and reenforcing the points of Biden. His first few questions were tailored to enrage Trump and put him on the defensive. I'm not sure how anyone could have missed that.
The only thing she did better was not yelling over Pence like that cuck faggot Wallace. Her questions were incredibly partisan and derogatory to the Trump-Pence administration. If she was remotely fair, she would've asked Harris how she felt about her running mate now since not long ago she called him a racist and a sexual predator. She could've asked about Russiagate or Biden's dealings in Ukraine and China or where is Hunter. But they won't go there because it exposes the fact they're criminal scum
Fuck this moderator too.
Wallace is a duche. Hard to say this but the moderator was fair tonight. Even good. Pence had to ask the tough questions but she made Wallace look like a three year old.
Precisely.
The climate change "this is settled science" was bullshit. But besides that better than Wallace.
Well the bar was set pretty low after the last debate.
By fakenews standard, she appeared way better!
Heh well put. She was better than Wallace in every way... which is amazing considering she's with USAT and he's with FNC...
she couldn’t have controlled Trump either.
Looks like she's been into the SMILEX