411
Comments (9)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
dldeuce 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought the moderator did a much better job, and interfered much less, than Wallace. Clearly the debate on all three sides was more respectful. Keep in mind that Pence definitely held on to his time long after his 2min limit almost every time, and btw used that extra time very effectively. Overall, I think the distribution of time was very fair.

Now, the questions from the moderator, that's another story. Every question was biased towards a leftist POV and was loaded with leftist and obviously ridiculously false premises. Pence did an excellent job debating the moderator on that BS, but when is the GOP going to learn? I thought Trump would have negotiated a better deal from the get go, or walked, but at least he's walking from the table now. I hope he walks from any further debates run by this corrupt "bipartisan" clown show!

1
ENTP [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was a stealth tactic. Act all polite, but consistently give Pence less time and interrupt him mid sentence before his time is even up

1
dldeuce 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't stop watch the whole debate. My impression was that the time allocation was fair. Pence had plenty of time. The bigger issue was that Pence hamstrung himself by not raising the real issues. For example, not once did he mention Hunter Biden. Harris is babbling on about loyalty to our friends. Pence doesn't even mention Hunter Biden? Yeah, I'd be loyal to my friends if my son got $1.5B. That's a pretty good friend! Pence had time. He crushed Harris. He could have crushed her into smithereens with the time he had.

1
ENTP [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your impression is incorrect, and mathematically disproven. Watch the whole debate... with a stopwatch. Significantly more time for Harris

1
dldeuce 1 point ago +1 / -0

No problem. Like I said, it was just my impression. Just curious. If you did stopwatch the whole debate, how much time for each side?