2016
Comments (42)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
34
deleted 34 points ago +34 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
2
nozonozo 2 points ago +2 / -0

"That will force Facebook to allow the truth."

Impossible. Facebook is run by Zuckerburger. They don't know what truth is.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
6
Isolated_Patriot 6 points ago +6 / -0

It was already build by the CIA, and likely run by the CIA, how much more government control do you want over the greatest propaganda machine ever built?

"Fixing" these platforms is not an option. They need unilaterally shut down and their servers wiped.

You want a better facebook? Let someone else build it in the ashes.

3
CmonPeopleGetReal 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Fact Checking" is the "Fake News" of 2016, remember it was the left and their media pawns that initiated the term to use against "fringe websites spreading misinformation online", instantly we flipped it on them and started calling them Fake News, now nobody remembers the origin, because the new home for the term is much more fitting.

We need to do the same to "fact checking"

3
leg_hairs 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Fact" checkers have more spin than the campaigns themselves. Just another layer of bullshit. Example: CBS news says Biden's xenophobic comments in regard to Trump's travel ban is "Inconclusive, mostly false."

Imagine having "fact" checkers, cable and network news, columnists, editors, intelligence agencies, academia, Twitter, Reddit, Hollywood, Google, Facebook, and the DC swamp on your side and still needing to cheat.

2
Indelible_Hippo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep watched the David Pakman show during debates. He literally just parrots “correct” after every sentence by the dem candidate lmao And then will mute the debate when the R is talking and explain why what he said is fake.... so dumb