He’s always been a fence sitter tbh. He’ll gladly talk moon landing conspiracies or something and then when he has an “expert” guest on its like he’s totally changed.
Haven’t listened in a while, but I’m guessing it’s still entertaining. Bring back Alex Jones and Eddie Bravo!
He's much more willing to talk about people and topics that the MSM won't touch—Tim Pool, Alex Jones, Twitter bans, etc.—so he looks legit when you judge by that. But if you pay attention to the content of his show, it's a lot of fence sitting. Like when he had Tim Pool on about Twitter bias with Jack Dorsey and that other woman (I think she's Twitter's legal counsel or something).
She kept talking in circles and he never called her on it. Plus, as other people have pointed out/memed on in the comments, he does a lot of "both sides have a point" and "well, I wouldn't want to claim expertise" no matter how clear something is. It's practically at the level where you could tell him "drinking water is good" and he'd say "there are lots of good drinks."
Don't get me wrong, it's admirable that he tries to stay neutral as a host, and it is important to let your guests talk. But I don't think he gets the balance quite right.
He did mention their concentration camp on the podcast before the switch so if he tried that now it's a dead give away. I think that clip was just him trying to be funny but if it worked he'd take the money lol. Also lying about aliens MIGHT mean you'd lie about whatever you're told but it's also lying about aliens. Those in the media complicit to framing our President did far worse for WAY less.
I could give a fuck. Rogan is trying to stunt, talk about the greenhouse effect.
At least Ye is real about it. I'm gonna make money from what I know, then I'm gonna talk my stuff. He can create a platform. Joe's life is the platform he created
TBH to get compelling interviews out of your guest you have to be willing to walk their path, at least be on middle ground. His style is not a confrontation, it's about getting content out of the guest.
That being said, post spotify he has had his dick slapped, and is being a little bitch.
Agreed on both points. I’ve noticed how he’ll agree with someone in one podcast but in a “okay keep talking but you’re crazy” way and then will throw that person under the bus in another podcast. I haven’t listed to much post-Spotify but it’s different
Yeah he has the same opinion of everyone he has on his show. That's pretty much his brand. The goal is to get the true positions of the people he has on
It's also rude to ask someone to come on and then clown them. He's too polite to do that unless the guest goes off the rails. And even then he usually politely asks questions (Adam Conover humiliating trans discussion).
The Alex Jones one was amazing. I dont care what people say about him he is entertaining as all fuck. Bravo too. Just good conversation and outlandish stories.
Rogan sits on the fence and his conversation style is prob ok for this kind of stuff. He will say... I dont really know about that BUT...
He has sold out to left wing media to keep on the air. We all know if you dont tow the line on left wing social media you get vanished.
To keep on the air? Dude is the biggest, by far, podcaster in the world. Its not even close. Its estimated he gets 20 million downloads a month. BEFORE Spotify. He could self fund his own...everything....before spotify overpaid him.
Thats what people say when they cant let go of the person they liked has now become a shill. I liked Joe years ago but lost all respect after the Bernie shit. Fuck Joe
A) you argue above that Joe made enough money to do his own platform and doesn't have to tie on to any platform. now you say well he got money and I would have taken it. you were talking out of both sides of your mouth, either he has the money to stand on his own platform to avoid censorship or he needed money so bad he took the Spotify in spite of the fact that they are censoring him.
B) I haven't been to Spotify to check but every article I've read and I've stayed up on it cuz this is a key issue for me, the episodes with Stephen molyneux Alex Jones Milo etc are not and have not ever been posted.
Which is not worthy of any respect or sympathy. It might be different if he were poor and had to put food on the table. But I hate nothing more than people with FU money that still sell out.
To be fair, Scott was personally harmed by SJW nonsense when it came to air times for his Dilbert show and such on I believe UPN. Scott was also never offered $100 million by probably anybody ever.
Time will tell what Rogan does, but personally I think he’ll flex a bit despite folding.
It's almost like he's a massive druggie. Sorry to offend any of you, but people who are tripping balls every day of their life are not noted for being reliable, trustworthy, intelligent or predictable.
If you haven’t listened to the episode with Alex “choke me out” Jones and Eddie “look into it” Bravo you just have to set aside like three hours of your day and give it a whirl. Some of the funniest shit ever.
Everyone (myself included) loves to imagine that they would hold steadfast to their values and never sell out like that. Lol fuck no I'd change my opinions for a few hundred mil just think how much hookers and blow that could buy, if you never come down from the bender you never have to feel shame!
(that's Pelosi's motto with her alcoholism and selling her soul to the Devil btw)
Surely despite your ivy league education, you've still managed to retain the capability of a yes/no answer to the hot potato question, instead of trying to avoid it ... right?
Most (if not literally all non-young) people have sold out some idea/value they used to hold. Most of the time, it wasn't even for money, just social pressure.
Oh my... ...I didn't think that Joe Rogan wanted a visit from Retracto The Correction Alpaca and a place of pride on the Wall of Shame, but now it's suddenly less mysterious as to why he has turned down Donald Trump appearing on his show. No it isn't, but it's taken away all doubt I ever had as to which side he was on: he's an anti-American prick who probably now regrets ever hosting the now pro-Trump Tim Pool.
I don't think he had too. I think someone showed him enough zeroes on a check so he went from selling thousands of plastic pussy cups and snake oil to selling one asshole.
He pushed fleshlights for most of the past decade. Click to his early 2010's podcasts. Fleshlight was his number 1 sponsor. I believe the same dude later paid him to sponsor "alphabrain"
I’ve never listened to his podcast, but I caught him a couple times as a guest on the Corolla podcast. I remember him explaining his theory that psychedelic mushrooms were planted here by aliens to teach us a their language. He was completely serious.
He's making a Sweeping Generalization, but the psychoactive drugs are all over the place in some religious origins. That's archeological, anthropological, scientific and historic fact at this point.
The Ancient Hebrew Anointing Oil (Christos is a Greek Title, meaning "Anointed One"), has been show by Israeli Scientists repeatedly to have contained large amounts of psychoactive cannabis alkaloids. The recipe is literally Biblical in Origin.
This is not an advocacy, but one must give credit where credit is due. Psychoactive Drugs irrefutably play a role in the origins of the world's Major Religions, and many, many cults. The suppression of this information by say The Roman Catholic Church, and Sects of Christianity, along with Rabbinical Judaism, as examples, have been relentless.
Even many here today, reading this, would chose to suppress the information if they could because it conflicts with, or threatens their world view. But thankfully, the Scientific Community continues to discover more evidence as to these realities with each passing year.
Enjoy the Deep Dive for those who chose to. Courtesy of The Based Hobbit!
Edit: Note the several Down Toots. These are the same types of minds that would have burned those who possessed this knowledge at the stake. Also drowned, hung, shot, and visited the Horrors of The Inquisition, along with all manner of tortures, all for knowledge of psychopharmacology, and choosing what some perceive as Gnosis with their Creator, through Ecstatic States. Quite telling, the Religious Zealotry, even across time.
So important was this understanding of induced Ecstatic States, the in was Enshrined by the Founders of America, who held the knowledge via their Free Masonic Initiations. Benjamin Franklin even designed a Medal, containing the Wisdom of Antiquity, as he saw it.
https://realitysandwich.com/319569/magic-mushrooms-in-north-america-before-the-wassons/
You might want to take anything with John Allegro off the list. He went full retard and published the most embarrassing book of biblical scholarship ofthe 20th century.
Problem is, if you take Allegro out then the argument that Christianity started as a psychedelic drug cult goes with him.
Beyond Allegro:
There is a mountain of evidence for entheogenic mushrooms in Christianity, some of which was referenced in part, in the documentaries linked.
Academia at present does not share your opinions, at all. I'm afraid you've been left in the dustbin of history, old boi.
Edit:
Per Allegro's "Full Retard" which was him actually going against the ridiculous "Scholarship" of the Catholic Archdiocese in Jordan, under Rockefeller Control(Rockefeller Institute). For those unfamiliar, the otherScholars translating the Dead Sea Scrolls fragments, all of whom were Religious, would bring their translations to the Mon-Senior in charge, and he would inform them to change the translation if it conflicted with Catholic Doctrine, per the Orders from Rome.
Further, the scroll fragments were just stuffed in baskets, in non climate controlled facilities, and evident "Foot Dragging" on moving the translations forward at all. No efforts were being made to preserve the ancient scrolls against further degredations, and Allegro arrived at the conclusion that Rome had the hope that they would eventually degrade beyond recognition, thus eliminating any controversy with Church Doctrine.
Allegro was only on the project due to massive International Outcry, from the world academic community, as having the Roman Catholic Church, in charge of Ancient Jewish Writings, seemed ludicrious. Needless to say, Allegro was horrified, and refused to go along with the sham, as he was not religious, and GAVE ZERO FUCKS about Catholic Dogma. So he published his findings, despite Rome threatening to destroy his career.
I am familiar with and have spent, and will continue to spend many hours of time on Lexis Nexis, and various Academic Portals.
You didn't cite a recent refutation of Allegro, at all. If one encounters Ethnobotany, and Entheobotany in even Undergrad Anthropology, Archaeology, Sociology, or Historic Psychopharmacology, especially within an Comparative Religions Context, it is a mainstream sense at this point, per the textbooks having to cover it, at least as a Theory.
This means you have far more than just Allegro's work to contend with, across a spectrum of Disciplines. The connections between Mithraism, and Christianity, at this point, both containing Astro-theological dying and resurrecting Solar Agricultural Deities, are unambiguous. In the case of Mithraism, you again for The Mushroom Cult. What exactly was/is your Academic Background?
I didn't cite her, but prior to the Council Of Nicea, many Christians didn't believe in the "Divinity" of Yeshua Ben Yoseph. They thought he was a man, and a teacher(Rabbi), but not a God/god. So when it was put to a vote, and the Losers lost, their Theology was scrubbed, their books destroyed, their teachings forbidden, and much was added to create the "Big Tent", for Political Purposes of Mind Control, which is essential to Government.
Govern-To Control.
Ment- The Mind.
This is the job of Priests, and Rulers, in any Civilization. Social Engineering.
The Cult of Mithras, became the Cult of Sol Invictus, which became the Roman Catholic Church. This is not contested by Secular Historians, and Archaeologists. This isn't some Great Secret, and at the core of all of it, is an Agrarian Civilization, managed by Priests(Smart Scholars), who are responsible for running the whole show.
Like the Pentagram being an Astronomical Representation of the Orbital Motion of Venus(Lucifer-Sun of The Morning, Herald of The Sun/ God), as observed by these Astronomer Priests, and creators of Calendars, much can be added by later, or competing groups, on top of Primary Religious Symbolism. Like all of the Solar Cult aspects added by the Cult of Sol Invictus(A Solar Cult), over the early stories of a Rebel Jew, in the Roman Province of Judea.
Thanks for the insanely detailed response. I get it and I’m not interested in suppression. But I worship God not “Science.” Joe always strikes me as one of those guys really quick to take a shot at God and I don’t really care for it.
The concept of a Creator doesn't seem to be in his lexicon. He says flat out that he's a meathead, and his appeal to authority is constant at this point. Although seemingly not a Higher Authority.
Thanks for acknowledging the post, it does take time and effort to relay. Hope it's useful in some capacity. If the premise is that we have a Creator, within this construct, all exists within the creation. Meaning everything has a purpose. Some have argued since recorded history that certain Sacraments were created for the purposes of Communion.
It does become annoying that a meat head like Joe is this large scale arbiter of discussion around these topics.
You forgot to add Yoga, and Meditation. There are many different paths.
As I said, not an advocacy, as much as acknowledging the Historical Facts. We do need dialogue on it, over on the Political Right. Many, if not most chose to sweep it under the rug, so the Left just runs wild with it, and Degeneracy is clearly a part of the rift between the two sides.
That whole idea of reading books, instead of burning or suppressing them.
My Friend, I respect what you wrote, and that is exactly, precisely what I'm trying to convey. Vitally, per the need for open and honest discussion, lest the road to ruin be laid so openly at the feet of so many, with drug usage, as say Joe Rogan recklessly and stupidly advertises. Thank you for clarifying and expanding.
And it is precisely because of a Religious Background, and beginning to find oddities and idiosyncratic factoids with historic Drug Cults/ Religions, that it is a foregone conclusion that others will follow the same path, at least in the exploration of ideas. These ideas are openly thrown about, along with the Scientific and Historical Evidence in the University Environment. It must be understood that these Religious Sacraments were not used in recreational settings, as many of them(Like Mushrooms), were seasonal, and rare. They were ingested in ritual, and prayer, under specific conditions, with guidance from Wise Elders/ Priests. I won't belabor the point, but those historical realities must be integrated, and acknowledged.
The consequences of not doing so, create the legions of those who have been victimized, unknowingly damaging their psyches. In the case of a great many young people in the 1960's and 1970's, they destroyed their potential, and some have made the argument that this was by design. See Tavistock Institute, and the CIA being the largest single supplier of LSD-25 in the US for many years. Drug use can destroy Critical Thinking and Reasoning Faculties. Exactly what Internationalist/ Globalist Banker Overlords Love!!
Exactly. I'd never heard of Peter Attia until he had him on the podcast and he's a very interesting medical researcher. I think I didn't know about Tim Pool either until he was on the podcast. And I loved the ones he did with Shapiro and the one he did with Crowder. The vast majority I don't give a shit, but every now and then there's a pony hidden in the pile.
I used to listen to one or two a week, now I may listen to one a month.
He used to have all these crazy people on, but I think he's found that fringe speakers get him a lot of flak, without any perceived upshot. What he's missing is the crazy guests are the reason he has so many listeners.
The percentage is worse than that, more like maybe one decent guest every two weeks. But given how many other Youtubes I tune in for, it's still more time than I have to listen while working or playing video games, so I usually save that for times when my favorite radio hosts are on vacation (like Christmas/New Years).
I do love that he does a lot of non-PC stuff like having Leah Remini and Ron White on to discuss the scam that is Scientology.
Yeah, Rogan is an influential person in media, but why do we really care so much about him otherwise? If he says something we agree with, this site praises him. When he says something we disagree with, everyone jumps on the wagon to hate him. He at least gets a huge variety of ideas and backgrounds on his show, which can't be said much elsewhere.
Tulsi though is a total snake, and actively involved in the political arena and is deserving of much more scrutiny than a podcast host.
That's not really the same thing. Tulsi may have disagreed with Trump but (as far as I know) hasn't attacked him and spewed vicious things about him like Joe has. Joe is also just an entertainer whereas Tulsi is a soldier and a Patriot even if she does have a D by her name. Tulsi is NOT a radical leftist and is basically an outcast because of her opposition to current democrat politics and policies. Based on what Tulsi's believes and how she behaves, I would say that Tulsi is basically a conservative and even though she is essentially just a Democrat In Name Only, I will continue to support and respect her because she has proper morals and values that she stands by unlike Joe Rogan. If the democrats were more like her, America would be a much better place.
Tulsi is not from california you dumbocrat. I bet you're one of these rogan apologists right? Well you seem as dumb, ignorant and average as joe rogan.
This thread is making me feel so much better. So much joe rogan on here and I’m like... he’s obsessed with drugs. He has 0 appeal outside of morons who think drugs are good
Drugs are bad but we live in a free country and if someone wants to smoke weed, take LSD, or whatever kind of drug they should be free to do it. It’s time we stopped wasting our tax dollars to keep people from getting high.
It’s a free country. It’s time to stop spending resources fighting drunk driving. It’s a free country. It’s time we legalize PCP, and if they kill people while high we will deal with it after. It’s a free country. It’s time we legalize pedophilia/child porn.
NO! Fuck off
Never. I will never stop putting the good of the society ahead of indefensible personal choices. It’s stupid as fuck. Good luck finding a country that says things like drunk driving is fine. “Drunk driving doesn’t hurt anyone as long as you don’t get in a wreck! Personal choice! Freedom!” That’s the exact argument you’re making.
I don’t know where you have gotten that I am for drunk driving? My view has been and always will be if you are not harming anyone else you should be allowed to do it. Smoking weed in your own home? 100% for it. Tripping on LSD in your own home. 100% for it. Why on earth do you want the government telling people what they can and cannot consume?
And those choices are only indefensible to YOU. You may think going to church on Sunday is great but I think it does more harm than good. Should I advocate that you can’t go to church on Sunday because it’s against my personal beliefs?
Also if we are for reducing the power of the government and reducing spending why are you ok with spending more tax payer money and expanding the power of the government just to keep people from smoking weed in their own homes. It’s insanity. People will always consume drugs whether it’s alcohol, cannabis, psychedelics, or any other intoxicant. Thinking we can keep people from doing that by throwing money at it is insanity.
And FYI, you are SO bad at this. When you try to defend your position with “well what if I think that religion is as bad/worse than drugs for society.” Yeah. You literally just proved you’re a fucking moron, which only makes me more sure that I’m right and you actually aren’t even worth listening/talking to. And I’m an atheist. Your argument is just that bad. Objective reality does exist. Go fuck yourself
“Hey guys! Look at me! I’m a moron! Driving drunk should be legal, it’s only the wreck that should be a crime! Derp derp! I can’t possibly understand how we should be proactive and step in before it causes harm! Comfort of your own car! Durrrrr!”
That’s fucking YOU!
It’s literally the same concept. Most crime is committed by people who abuse drugs and alcohol, and most of that crime is actually CAUSED by the substance abuse!
And that’s before even considering that drugs are horrible for your health.
There’s a reason why this shit stays illegal. Because non-retards understand the obvious and are okay with being proactive.
Here’s a scenario for you: man does meth in the “comfort of his own home” another man offers him some coffee “in the comfort on his own home” drugged out man interprets offer of coffee as a threat to throw coffee in his face because he’s on drugs, drugged out man stabs coffee man to death.
SPOILERS
THIS ACTUALLY HAPPENED.
You know what would have been better? If druggy had never used drugs in the first place! And you know why that story isn’t more common? Because we limit access to drugs in the first place. We could and should do better. But again, see China for what happens when the government cannot intervene at all.
Here’s another one: man eats a fuck ton of magic mushrooms “in the comfort of his own home.” Man strips naked, walks out of his home, into his neighbors home, and into the room of their young daughter, traumatizing her.
Spoilers - my friend actually did that.
The comfort of your own home fails to protect you and others from your induced insanity
I’m not religious at all. But religion is extremely defensible. And it’s not even “more harm than good.” You’re advocating all drugs and then hide behind weed. You are too fucking stupid to see that these drugs are inherently unsafe. Like a drunk driver, the propensity for harm is immense. And it’s not in the drunk drivers interests to drive drunk either. Same as it’s not in the stupid druggy’s interest to do drugs. No one should be driving drunk. No one should be doing drugs. If you think religion does harm you’re just stupid as fuck.
And yes, if you are a stupid fuck that wants to ban religion and legalize drugs, then go start your own country and do exactly that.
But I will NEVER stop preventing you from doing it as long as we share a country, and you can go jump off a cliff if you think you’ll ever get me on your side.
You’re actually factually 100% wrong. Prohibition reduced alcohol consumption. Outlawing drugs reduces drug consumption. Look at the effects of the opium wars in China, where Britain forced China to accept opium. It destroyed the empire.
And who the fuck said I’m against the government in all situations. The government is often the best tool to solve a problem.
Yup, the elite trash conservatism for personal gain, then flee the effects of liberalism to live in conservative sanctuaries. Then proceed to rinse and repeat.
There needs to be a name for these morons who are always contradicting themselves. Bernie Bros who try to jump on the Libertarian train don't seem to understand anything.
So if your clients are commies, then you're a commie - despite you saying you're maga and acting in a maga way.
That's ... uh ... an extremely high IQ way of thinking that surpasses my humble reasoning capabilities, to say the least. Would you give me some hints on joining mensa, you know, as a fellow pede?
What is the purpose of clarifying your distinctions here? They don't give prizes for sorting out which faggot is from anti-Trump Camp A or anti-Trump Camp B.
Unrealistic (read: stupid) remarks require cauterizing regardless of their point of origin. Consider it a social service. And while was not acting like a gentleman here, after the indignation period passes you'll have learned something, becoming a better person.
He's a stand up comedian, decently successful at it
Debatable. I've seen his stand up, I though it was awful.
I've watched his podcast for years - for the guests, not his views or opinions. When he shuts up and listens, great show. When he starts pontificating, he's just a meathead from Boston who's a curdled mess of pot, woo woo mushroom drug bullshit, and sheer ignorance. But I got introduced to some great people via his show, so I just don't pay attention when he hauls his soapbox out. I skip the MMA shows, because I don't watch MMA, and I skip his comic friends mostly. I skipped Bernie, because fuck that noise.
But I'm not following to Spotify. Fuck Spotify. I have issues with that company ANYWAY, along with Pandora, for how they've treated musicians. Not gonna go down that rabbit hole, but trust me, the musicians I know hate Spotify, and say that the majority of musicians who pay attention to their streaming numbers do as well.
Definitely seems like the Deep State is going to try as hard as it can to get ahead of O'Keefe before he becomes more mainstream the way they got ahead of Alex Jones. Dismiss them as conspiracy, non-credible so that the normies dismiss it before they even venture into the Redpill areas of the net
All Jamie is good at is following a conversation and Googling along or pulling up shit from Joe’s social media. He’s the best “producer” in the world at this simple task.
He needs to shut his fucking mouth because he can’t interpret what the search functions return in any meaningful way. He’s a glorified Alexa/Siri.
Whatever criticisms can be made about Rogan, anybody who's watched him over the years knows he would be vastly more fair than swamp shits like Wallace and the other sleazy CPD cunts. That's the very important thing a lot of people are missing.
Joe might often be a bitch, but it's better than someone who is always a bitch like Chris, or someone like the other bitch who has her head up Nancy's ragged ass
Straight out of the Andrew Breitbart Dojo, O’keefe is going to submit Joe Rogan in round one. Rogan is afraid, he’s never encountered a fighter with this much skill and training.
both Tim Pool and Joe Rogan, each, likely got Trump more votes during this election than this whole site.
Their centrist public position allows them to reach the people in the middle in a way no Trump supporter really can.
That said, I think Joe Rogan leans a bit left of center, but more importantly he employs extremely biased 'fact checkers' on his show, whom he seems to trust.
I honestly don't know if he is a fraud, of he is getting slowly corrupted by his SJW staffers - many times when I tuned in to his show, I watched him ask for a fact check and get MSM talking points back.
He is a trend runner, a click baiter, a social chameleon who sits on the fence and takes on whatever position it takes. He is a headline jockey too, so he can sound smart but he is actually mostly just a moron.
my take on him is he does his best to be non-confrontational with every guest he gets to come on his show.
Which is why he actually gets guests from all sides of the spectrum.
If he set a hard position on anything, people who oppose that position, wouldn't come on to his show.
you are not wrong, but social chameleons have their value. They are one of the few remaining bridges that connect political divides. There is a reason the left has been targeting Joe Rogan so heavily these last months (Spotify employees actively trying to harass Spotify into somehow going back on the deal they made with Rogan and compel him to give up editorial control of the show).
Joe Rogan, from what I heard is literally the biggest podcast voice in english speaking world. His reach is mostly due to him being a fence-sitter and his audience mostly acknowledges that his role is to just be a sounding-board for whatever guest is on his show that day.
Tencent(China) heavily invests into spotify. STOP paying for spotify, and stop using it in general. Joe Rogan is now heavily cucked, at least before he was cucked of his own free will. Now he is forced to shill
WTF do they even mean by "not real"? Like computer generated? Or are they implying the guy is an actor or something? The guy is not an actor. He's been interviewed by the news. He really is a democrat campaigner.
You know what's going on here? They're afraid because Omar is black, and criticizing a black person is racist, and Rogan has to walk on eggshells now that the woke Spotify controls him.
It's so funny because that's a common tactic of the left wing media: blowing a situation to its largest possible proportion.
It's like when they harped on "Russians hacking the election." What does that mean? Does it mean soft entry into ballot machines and changing results? Does it mean physical disposal or fabrication of ballots? Does it mean a mass disinformation campaign with an equally great wave of regret? No! It was just 10 Facebook accounts owned by Russians, which, in the broadest sense of the word, is "hacking an election."
GO CHECK THE YOUTUBE COMMENTS (before Google messes with them). They are all calling out Rogan. Gives hope, a lot of people seeing through Rogans BS on this one. I don’t mind him from time to time, but this was total shill-mode.
I like Joe because his guests are entertaining or informative, more often than not. Joe himself, is, as he says, just a regular f**king idiot. Joe isn't an expert in MOST of the things he discusses on his podcast outside of MMA, Comedy, and getting high. He's a talk show host basically but in a more informative format.
Rogan is a douche now. He used to be good but had to sell out to keep his casts on the air.
He went mainstream just to make money
He’s always been a fence sitter tbh. He’ll gladly talk moon landing conspiracies or something and then when he has an “expert” guest on its like he’s totally changed.
Haven’t listened in a while, but I’m guessing it’s still entertaining. Bring back Alex Jones and Eddie Bravo!
Yeah, man, the dude is a chameleon and he's just after views and money. Eddie, on the other hand, is hillarious and entertaining.
Joe "CIA, I'm Available" Rogan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXnkaSfu3As
He was always For Sale.
People think he's legit still. Not real sure why, but they do.
He’s not legit, but he’s a good interviewer. He does create an entertaining show even out of boring topics.
People are sheepish, tbh.
He's much more willing to talk about people and topics that the MSM won't touch—Tim Pool, Alex Jones, Twitter bans, etc.—so he looks legit when you judge by that. But if you pay attention to the content of his show, it's a lot of fence sitting. Like when he had Tim Pool on about Twitter bias with Jack Dorsey and that other woman (I think she's Twitter's legal counsel or something).
She kept talking in circles and he never called her on it. Plus, as other people have pointed out/memed on in the comments, he does a lot of "both sides have a point" and "well, I wouldn't want to claim expertise" no matter how clear something is. It's practically at the level where you could tell him "drinking water is good" and he'd say "there are lots of good drinks."
Don't get me wrong, it's admirable that he tries to stay neutral as a host, and it is important to let your guests talk. But I don't think he gets the balance quite right.
It really is. I don't get it. He's a total hack.
What else are they supposed to do with the Fleshlight he sold them?
Fleshjack
Good question. Joe Rogaine is an insufferable faggot. It’s all so tiresome.
The fact he's an influential comedian who signed a 100 million dollar deal is more damning than that.
Just wait for it "China really isn't that bad.."
He did mention their concentration camp on the podcast before the switch so if he tried that now it's a dead give away. I think that clip was just him trying to be funny but if it worked he'd take the money lol. Also lying about aliens MIGHT mean you'd lie about whatever you're told but it's also lying about aliens. Those in the media complicit to framing our President did far worse for WAY less.
I could give a fuck. Rogan is trying to stunt, talk about the greenhouse effect.
At least Ye is real about it. I'm gonna make money from what I know, then I'm gonna talk my stuff. He can create a platform. Joe's life is the platform he created
I remember that one. Judging by his revised approach to certain topics, someone took him up on the offer!
Just look into it, bro. All I’m saying...
"Someone's figured it out"
"I dunno, man, I dunno."
TBH to get compelling interviews out of your guest you have to be willing to walk their path, at least be on middle ground. His style is not a confrontation, it's about getting content out of the guest.
That being said, post spotify he has had his dick slapped, and is being a little bitch.
Agreed on both points. I’ve noticed how he’ll agree with someone in one podcast but in a “okay keep talking but you’re crazy” way and then will throw that person under the bus in another podcast. I haven’t listed to much post-Spotify but it’s different
Yeah he has the same opinion of everyone he has on his show. That's pretty much his brand. The goal is to get the true positions of the people he has on
It's also rude to ask someone to come on and then clown them. He's too polite to do that unless the guest goes off the rails. And even then he usually politely asks questions (Adam Conover humiliating trans discussion).
The Alex Jones one was amazing. I dont care what people say about him he is entertaining as all fuck. Bravo too. Just good conversation and outlandish stories.
Rogan sits on the fence and his conversation style is prob ok for this kind of stuff. He will say... I dont really know about that BUT...
He has sold out to left wing media to keep on the air. We all know if you dont tow the line on left wing social media you get vanished.
He is trying to keep his income
To keep on the air? Dude is the biggest, by far, podcaster in the world. Its not even close. Its estimated he gets 20 million downloads a month. BEFORE Spotify. He could self fund his own...everything....before spotify overpaid him.
Thats what people say when they cant let go of the person they liked has now become a shill. I liked Joe years ago but lost all respect after the Bernie shit. Fuck Joe
What went on with Bernie? Other than Joe liking him?
What's worse than a rich guy who already has everything promoting someone who will make it impossible to attain rich guy status?
"I got mine, fuck all yall"
Fuck'n rights! Thank you.
Farther down here, I mentioned that I unsubscribed. I will check to see if there is anyone worth listening to about once a week.
Same reason i check on FNC, before settling into OAN for the evening. I might find something I like occasionally.
then why did he cuck out to Spotify and let them outright remove certain episodes?!?
Because he's a greedy sack of shit
If I were handed a pile of cash, I'd probably take it. Secondly, if I read it right, the episodes were uploaded anyway, after spotify got called out.
A) you argue above that Joe made enough money to do his own platform and doesn't have to tie on to any platform. now you say well he got money and I would have taken it. you were talking out of both sides of your mouth, either he has the money to stand on his own platform to avoid censorship or he needed money so bad he took the Spotify in spite of the fact that they are censoring him.
B) I haven't been to Spotify to check but every article I've read and I've stayed up on it cuz this is a key issue for me, the episodes with Stephen molyneux Alex Jones Milo etc are not and have not ever been posted.
If I already was super wealthy and could become super duper wealthy by selling my soul, I'd say fuckoff.
Yeah and Milo was big at a time (not as big, but big). Once you get banned and shunned by enough people and platforms you're done.
Which is not worthy of any respect or sympathy. It might be different if he were poor and had to put food on the table. But I hate nothing more than people with FU money that still sell out.
Scott Adams has FU money and stuck by his principles
Rogan cant do that.
To be fair, Scott was personally harmed by SJW nonsense when it came to air times for his Dilbert show and such on I believe UPN. Scott was also never offered $100 million by probably anybody ever.
Time will tell what Rogan does, but personally I think he’ll flex a bit despite folding.
Scott has fuck off money and he is on the right side of history
Yeah he's a slimy reptilian.
It's almost like he's a massive druggie. Sorry to offend any of you, but people who are tripping balls every day of their life are not noted for being reliable, trustworthy, intelligent or predictable.
I don't know any sane people who claim to be reliable and intelligent while high. I don't think many will be offended.
If you haven’t listened to the episode with Alex “choke me out” Jones and Eddie “look into it” Bravo you just have to set aside like three hours of your day and give it a whirl. Some of the funniest shit ever.
$100 million reasons to push the narrative. Spotify OWNS him now. I wonder if he feels any shame.
Yeah, if he fails to uphold the terms of their contract, he may have a "You have to pay us back" clause.
Money like that always comes with strings
❎ doubt
Everyone (myself included) loves to imagine that they would hold steadfast to their values and never sell out like that. Lol fuck no I'd change my opinions for a few hundred mil just think how much hookers and blow that could buy, if you never come down from the bender you never have to feel shame!
(that's Pelosi's motto with her alcoholism and selling her soul to the Devil btw)
I think they use carrot and stick.
Sell out with big contract, or they could have eaten his lunch and banned him where they laughed about his buddy casting couch abusing that girl.
Someone offered you 100 mil and you declined.
Alex, those $500 we were talking about...
Surely despite your ivy league education, you've still managed to retain the capability of a yes/no answer to the hot potato question, instead of trying to avoid it ... right?
Most (if not literally all non-young) people have sold out some idea/value they used to hold. Most of the time, it wasn't even for money, just social pressure.
Oh my... ...I didn't think that Joe Rogan wanted a visit from Retracto The Correction Alpaca and a place of pride on the Wall of Shame, but now it's suddenly less mysterious as to why he has turned down Donald Trump appearing on his show. No it isn't, but it's taken away all doubt I ever had as to which side he was on: he's an anti-American prick who probably now regrets ever hosting the now pro-Trump Tim Pool.
I don't think he had too. I think someone showed him enough zeroes on a check so he went from selling thousands of plastic pussy cups and snake oil to selling one asshole.
Plastic pussy cups? Da fuck?
He pushed fleshlights for most of the past decade. Click to his early 2010's podcasts. Fleshlight was his number 1 sponsor. I believe the same dude later paid him to sponsor "alphabrain"
Christ, didn't know about the pocket pussy. New about that nootropic shit.
There's a reason he shut down his forum right as #metoo started.
Look for his 2012 reddit ama, if it still exists (doubtful), and check out what he was saying back then. The board was 10ish years old at that time.
Straight savage shit that he milked for his routines at the time.
Joe has lots of skeletons and its not all that secret.
Do tell of these skeletons.
Sauce? I can't find anything that says Rogan was driving the car the hit Dino.
I've tried and couldn't find anything.
I saw "secret" and thought secret, lol!
yessir
link?
Joe Rogan signed a 100 million dollar deal with Spotify. Spotify has a partnership with Tencent. Tencent has ties to the China Communist Party (CCP).
DING DING DING - WINNER!
Joe is a bad actor, and shilling hard now.
Maybe, Jones was super pissed at first but Rogan talked him down, I trust Jones.
Sold out to
SpotifyTencentCCP, now he shills for them. What a shock!Joe Rogan- I mean, who knows, could be just one guy ballot harvesting Also Joe Rogan- All religions are based on psychedelics? Definitely, 100%
Yeah he’s obsessed with drugs. I’ve never been a fan
I’ve never listened to his podcast, but I caught him a couple times as a guest on the Corolla podcast. I remember him explaining his theory that psychedelic mushrooms were planted here by aliens to teach us a their language. He was completely serious.
I hate his stand ups because of this. It's like listening to a 50 year old frat boy.
Definitely a man-child
He's making a Sweeping Generalization, but the psychoactive drugs are all over the place in some religious origins. That's archeological, anthropological, scientific and historic fact at this point.
As an example: https://psychedelicgospels.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tAWr1t3pjc John Allegro’s “The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross” (feat. Terence Mckenna)
Sacred Mushroom: A Lost History (FULL DOCUMENTARY) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mUJr2iLMB4
The Origins of Religion: as Reference to Sacred (Psilocybin) Mushrooms. By Reverend Nicklas B. Failla 3rdEd https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KP3KLK0cPCI
If you're studying Anthropology, Ethno-Botany, and Comparative Religious Studies, these scientific and historical facts are unavoidable.
British Llama Mike Crowley of the Tibetan Buddhist Tradition on "The Secret Drugs of Buddhism": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpZNPWs5cV0
The Ancient Hebrew Anointing Oil (Christos is a Greek Title, meaning "Anointed One"), has been show by Israeli Scientists repeatedly to have contained large amounts of psychoactive cannabis alkaloids. The recipe is literally Biblical in Origin.
https://www.cannabisculture.com/content/2020/05/29/ancient-judaic-use-of-cannabis-for-shamanic-ecstasy-verified-by-archeological-evidence/
Cannabis: A Lost History (FULL DOCUMENTARY) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2p6qFT_Zjg
The evidence is simply overwhelming.
This is not an advocacy, but one must give credit where credit is due. Psychoactive Drugs irrefutably play a role in the origins of the world's Major Religions, and many, many cults. The suppression of this information by say The Roman Catholic Church, and Sects of Christianity, along with Rabbinical Judaism, as examples, have been relentless.
Even many here today, reading this, would chose to suppress the information if they could because it conflicts with, or threatens their world view. But thankfully, the Scientific Community continues to discover more evidence as to these realities with each passing year.
Enjoy the Deep Dive for those who chose to. Courtesy of The Based Hobbit!
Edit: Note the several Down Toots. These are the same types of minds that would have burned those who possessed this knowledge at the stake. Also drowned, hung, shot, and visited the Horrors of The Inquisition, along with all manner of tortures, all for knowledge of psychopharmacology, and choosing what some perceive as Gnosis with their Creator, through Ecstatic States. Quite telling, the Religious Zealotry, even across time.
So important was this understanding of induced Ecstatic States, the in was Enshrined by the Founders of America, who held the knowledge via their Free Masonic Initiations. Benjamin Franklin even designed a Medal, containing the Wisdom of Antiquity, as he saw it. https://realitysandwich.com/319569/magic-mushrooms-in-north-america-before-the-wassons/
You might want to take anything with John Allegro off the list. He went full retard and published the most embarrassing book of biblical scholarship ofthe 20th century.
Problem is, if you take Allegro out then the argument that Christianity started as a psychedelic drug cult goes with him.
Thankfully, Stoned Ape Theory has nothing to do with any cult shit
Embarrassing how exactly, and for whom?
http://www.johnallegro.org/the-defamation-of-allegro-by-jan-irvin-excerpted-from-astrotheology-shamanism/
Beyond Allegro: There is a mountain of evidence for entheogenic mushrooms in Christianity, some of which was referenced in part, in the documentaries linked.
Academia at present does not share your opinions, at all. I'm afraid you've been left in the dustbin of history, old boi.
https://desertfathers.blogspot.com/2014/06/christianity-and-mushrooms_2.html
Mushrooms in Christian Art I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OP2cxtzKtI
Edit: Per Allegro's "Full Retard" which was him actually going against the ridiculous "Scholarship" of the Catholic Archdiocese in Jordan, under Rockefeller Control(Rockefeller Institute). For those unfamiliar, the otherScholars translating the Dead Sea Scrolls fragments, all of whom were Religious, would bring their translations to the Mon-Senior in charge, and he would inform them to change the translation if it conflicted with Catholic Doctrine, per the Orders from Rome.
Further, the scroll fragments were just stuffed in baskets, in non climate controlled facilities, and evident "Foot Dragging" on moving the translations forward at all. No efforts were being made to preserve the ancient scrolls against further degredations, and Allegro arrived at the conclusion that Rome had the hope that they would eventually degrade beyond recognition, thus eliminating any controversy with Church Doctrine.
Allegro was only on the project due to massive International Outcry, from the world academic community, as having the Roman Catholic Church, in charge of Ancient Jewish Writings, seemed ludicrious. Needless to say, Allegro was horrified, and refused to go along with the sham, as he was not religious, and GAVE ZERO FUCKS about Catholic Dogma. So he published his findings, despite Rome threatening to destroy his career.
For further defense of Allegro: The Holy Mushroom Evidence of Mushrooms in Judeo-Christianity: A critical re-evaluation of the schism between John M. Allegro and R. Gordon Wasson over the theory on the entheogenic origins of Christianity presented in The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross by J.R. Irvin, © 2008. ISBN 13: 9781439215173 Published: October 2008 Library of Congress Control Number: 2008909509 With 38 colour, and 7 B&W plates
Ahh, linking to Allegro hagiography to prove that he wasn't bonkers...are you not familiar with how you go about checking an academic source?
If you actually think "academia" is on board with this then I genuinely feel sorry for you.
I am familiar with and have spent, and will continue to spend many hours of time on Lexis Nexis, and various Academic Portals.
You didn't cite a recent refutation of Allegro, at all. If one encounters Ethnobotany, and Entheobotany in even Undergrad Anthropology, Archaeology, Sociology, or Historic Psychopharmacology, especially within an Comparative Religions Context, it is a mainstream sense at this point, per the textbooks having to cover it, at least as a Theory.
This means you have far more than just Allegro's work to contend with, across a spectrum of Disciplines. The connections between Mithraism, and Christianity, at this point, both containing Astro-theological dying and resurrecting Solar Agricultural Deities, are unambiguous. In the case of Mithraism, you again for The Mushroom Cult. What exactly was/is your Academic Background?
I knew astro-theology was coming (muh Acharya S!?!?!)...you get the final word here.
Sorry, didn't catch your Academic Background?
I didn't cite her, but prior to the Council Of Nicea, many Christians didn't believe in the "Divinity" of Yeshua Ben Yoseph. They thought he was a man, and a teacher(Rabbi), but not a God/god. So when it was put to a vote, and the Losers lost, their Theology was scrubbed, their books destroyed, their teachings forbidden, and much was added to create the "Big Tent", for Political Purposes of Mind Control, which is essential to Government.
Govern-To Control.
Ment- The Mind.
This is the job of Priests, and Rulers, in any Civilization. Social Engineering.
The Cult of Mithras, became the Cult of Sol Invictus, which became the Roman Catholic Church. This is not contested by Secular Historians, and Archaeologists. This isn't some Great Secret, and at the core of all of it, is an Agrarian Civilization, managed by Priests(Smart Scholars), who are responsible for running the whole show.
Like the Pentagram being an Astronomical Representation of the Orbital Motion of Venus(Lucifer-Sun of The Morning, Herald of The Sun/ God), as observed by these Astronomer Priests, and creators of Calendars, much can be added by later, or competing groups, on top of Primary Religious Symbolism. Like all of the Solar Cult aspects added by the Cult of Sol Invictus(A Solar Cult), over the early stories of a Rebel Jew, in the Roman Province of Judea.
Thanks for the insanely detailed response. I get it and I’m not interested in suppression. But I worship God not “Science.” Joe always strikes me as one of those guys really quick to take a shot at God and I don’t really care for it.
The concept of a Creator doesn't seem to be in his lexicon. He says flat out that he's a meathead, and his appeal to authority is constant at this point. Although seemingly not a Higher Authority.
Thanks for acknowledging the post, it does take time and effort to relay. Hope it's useful in some capacity. If the premise is that we have a Creator, within this construct, all exists within the creation. Meaning everything has a purpose. Some have argued since recorded history that certain Sacraments were created for the purposes of Communion.
It does become annoying that a meat head like Joe is this large scale arbiter of discussion around these topics.
You forgot to add Yoga, and Meditation. There are many different paths.
As I said, not an advocacy, as much as acknowledging the Historical Facts. We do need dialogue on it, over on the Political Right. Many, if not most chose to sweep it under the rug, so the Left just runs wild with it, and Degeneracy is clearly a part of the rift between the two sides.
That whole idea of reading books, instead of burning or suppressing them.
My Friend, I respect what you wrote, and that is exactly, precisely what I'm trying to convey. Vitally, per the need for open and honest discussion, lest the road to ruin be laid so openly at the feet of so many, with drug usage, as say Joe Rogan recklessly and stupidly advertises. Thank you for clarifying and expanding.
And it is precisely because of a Religious Background, and beginning to find oddities and idiosyncratic factoids with historic Drug Cults/ Religions, that it is a foregone conclusion that others will follow the same path, at least in the exploration of ideas. These ideas are openly thrown about, along with the Scientific and Historical Evidence in the University Environment. It must be understood that these Religious Sacraments were not used in recreational settings, as many of them(Like Mushrooms), were seasonal, and rare. They were ingested in ritual, and prayer, under specific conditions, with guidance from Wise Elders/ Priests. I won't belabor the point, but those historical realities must be integrated, and acknowledged.
The consequences of not doing so, create the legions of those who have been victimized, unknowingly damaging their psyches. In the case of a great many young people in the 1960's and 1970's, they destroyed their potential, and some have made the argument that this was by design. See Tavistock Institute, and the CIA being the largest single supplier of LSD-25 in the US for many years. Drug use can destroy Critical Thinking and Reasoning Faculties. Exactly what Internationalist/ Globalist Banker Overlords Love!!
Why does everyone like rorgan so much. All he does is get high, relive his glory days, and talk about "other times he got high".
True but there was that time one he got high and read a book about wolves.
"Who do you think would win in a fight between a bear and a gorilla?" -Joe Rogan, probably
A gorilla
For the 5-10% of his pods that were extremely interesting over the years.
Exactly. I'd never heard of Peter Attia until he had him on the podcast and he's a very interesting medical researcher. I think I didn't know about Tim Pool either until he was on the podcast. And I loved the ones he did with Shapiro and the one he did with Crowder. The vast majority I don't give a shit, but every now and then there's a pony hidden in the pile.
for every good guest theres 4 garbage guests suggested to him by his loser friends
I used to listen to one or two a week, now I may listen to one a month.
He used to have all these crazy people on, but I think he's found that fringe speakers get him a lot of flak, without any perceived upshot. What he's missing is the crazy guests are the reason he has so many listeners.
I don't subscribe to his channel any more, otherwise my podcast list would have more listenable hours than there are in a day.
However, i check his guests once a week, and about twice a month i listen to one.
The percentage is worse than that, more like maybe one decent guest every two weeks. But given how many other Youtubes I tune in for, it's still more time than I have to listen while working or playing video games, so I usually save that for times when my favorite radio hosts are on vacation (like Christmas/New Years). I do love that he does a lot of non-PC stuff like having Leah Remini and Ron White on to discuss the scam that is Scientology.
Yep. Pseudo-intellectual stoner.
100% agree. The little I’ve watched from him has all been about drugs. It’s really gross
I've said it before and I'll say it again.
Joe Rogan is NOT a Trump supported and is NOT a Patriot. Please stop supporting and promoting him!
Yeah, Rogan is an influential person in media, but why do we really care so much about him otherwise? If he says something we agree with, this site praises him. When he says something we disagree with, everyone jumps on the wagon to hate him. He at least gets a huge variety of ideas and backgrounds on his show, which can't be said much elsewhere.
Tulsi though is a total snake, and actively involved in the political arena and is deserving of much more scrutiny than a podcast host.
That's not really the same thing. Tulsi may have disagreed with Trump but (as far as I know) hasn't attacked him and spewed vicious things about him like Joe has. Joe is also just an entertainer whereas Tulsi is a soldier and a Patriot even if she does have a D by her name. Tulsi is NOT a radical leftist and is basically an outcast because of her opposition to current democrat politics and policies. Based on what Tulsi's believes and how she behaves, I would say that Tulsi is basically a conservative and even though she is essentially just a Democrat In Name Only, I will continue to support and respect her because she has proper morals and values that she stands by unlike Joe Rogan. If the democrats were more like her, America would be a much better place.
Eat shit faggot.
I don't support Tulsi's policies but I still support her and think she is a class act.
Tulsi is not from california you dumbocrat. I bet you're one of these rogan apologists right? Well you seem as dumb, ignorant and average as joe rogan.
yes do not support anyone who will not blindly vote for the candidate i want to win. Opinions that don't agree with mine are forbidden
Username checks out!
Joe Rogan has always been a cuck. I cannot for the life of me understand why so many people want to ride on his dick.
because he became a "trend" for the cool kids to act cool by listening to him
Well, this faggot hates his guts! hahaha
This thread is making me feel so much better. So much joe rogan on here and I’m like... he’s obsessed with drugs. He has 0 appeal outside of morons who think drugs are good
I know! I expected to get pushback for disliking him hahahaha
Drugs are bad but we live in a free country and if someone wants to smoke weed, take LSD, or whatever kind of drug they should be free to do it. It’s time we stopped wasting our tax dollars to keep people from getting high.
No
It’s a free country. It’s time to stop spending resources fighting drunk driving. It’s a free country. It’s time we legalize PCP, and if they kill people while high we will deal with it after. It’s a free country. It’s time we legalize pedophilia/child porn. NO! Fuck off
It is a free country. Stop putting your morals ahead of other peoples decisions.
Never. I will never stop putting the good of the society ahead of indefensible personal choices. It’s stupid as fuck. Good luck finding a country that says things like drunk driving is fine. “Drunk driving doesn’t hurt anyone as long as you don’t get in a wreck! Personal choice! Freedom!” That’s the exact argument you’re making.
I don’t know where you have gotten that I am for drunk driving? My view has been and always will be if you are not harming anyone else you should be allowed to do it. Smoking weed in your own home? 100% for it. Tripping on LSD in your own home. 100% for it. Why on earth do you want the government telling people what they can and cannot consume?
And those choices are only indefensible to YOU. You may think going to church on Sunday is great but I think it does more harm than good. Should I advocate that you can’t go to church on Sunday because it’s against my personal beliefs?
Also if we are for reducing the power of the government and reducing spending why are you ok with spending more tax payer money and expanding the power of the government just to keep people from smoking weed in their own homes. It’s insanity. People will always consume drugs whether it’s alcohol, cannabis, psychedelics, or any other intoxicant. Thinking we can keep people from doing that by throwing money at it is insanity.
And FYI, you are SO bad at this. When you try to defend your position with “well what if I think that religion is as bad/worse than drugs for society.” Yeah. You literally just proved you’re a fucking moron, which only makes me more sure that I’m right and you actually aren’t even worth listening/talking to. And I’m an atheist. Your argument is just that bad. Objective reality does exist. Go fuck yourself
https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/DRRC.PDF
“Hey guys! Look at me! I’m a moron! Driving drunk should be legal, it’s only the wreck that should be a crime! Derp derp! I can’t possibly understand how we should be proactive and step in before it causes harm! Comfort of your own car! Durrrrr!” That’s fucking YOU! It’s literally the same concept. Most crime is committed by people who abuse drugs and alcohol, and most of that crime is actually CAUSED by the substance abuse! And that’s before even considering that drugs are horrible for your health. There’s a reason why this shit stays illegal. Because non-retards understand the obvious and are okay with being proactive.
Here’s a scenario for you: man does meth in the “comfort of his own home” another man offers him some coffee “in the comfort on his own home” drugged out man interprets offer of coffee as a threat to throw coffee in his face because he’s on drugs, drugged out man stabs coffee man to death. SPOILERS THIS ACTUALLY HAPPENED. You know what would have been better? If druggy had never used drugs in the first place! And you know why that story isn’t more common? Because we limit access to drugs in the first place. We could and should do better. But again, see China for what happens when the government cannot intervene at all.
Here’s another one: man eats a fuck ton of magic mushrooms “in the comfort of his own home.” Man strips naked, walks out of his home, into his neighbors home, and into the room of their young daughter, traumatizing her. Spoilers - my friend actually did that. The comfort of your own home fails to protect you and others from your induced insanity
I’m not religious at all. But religion is extremely defensible. And it’s not even “more harm than good.” You’re advocating all drugs and then hide behind weed. You are too fucking stupid to see that these drugs are inherently unsafe. Like a drunk driver, the propensity for harm is immense. And it’s not in the drunk drivers interests to drive drunk either. Same as it’s not in the stupid druggy’s interest to do drugs. No one should be driving drunk. No one should be doing drugs. If you think religion does harm you’re just stupid as fuck. And yes, if you are a stupid fuck that wants to ban religion and legalize drugs, then go start your own country and do exactly that. But I will NEVER stop preventing you from doing it as long as we share a country, and you can go jump off a cliff if you think you’ll ever get me on your side. You’re actually factually 100% wrong. Prohibition reduced alcohol consumption. Outlawing drugs reduces drug consumption. Look at the effects of the opium wars in China, where Britain forced China to accept opium. It destroyed the empire. And who the fuck said I’m against the government in all situations. The government is often the best tool to solve a problem.
I like his podcasts since it humanizes the person. I skip a lot of the left leaning podcasts tho.
Jamie is a douche and Joe Rogan's podcast is boring unless Alex Jones is on.
Joe Rogan is just the stereotypical liberal douche moving away from what he voted for
Rolls Royce Limousine Liberal
Yup, the elite trash conservatism for personal gain, then flee the effects of liberalism to live in conservative sanctuaries. Then proceed to rinse and repeat.
Eric Weinstein had James on, held his feet to the fire, was a little obnoxious about it, but James held his own.
Rogan looks like he aged ten years in the last few months.
Swollen steroid HGH head
That's what happens when you sell your soul.
Has to catch up on all the babydick the cult is feeding him
Some libertarian moron who thinks he has appeal.
^Probably a more accurate description. He is definitely a fan of the chaotic side of things.
Eh Bernie libertarians aren't libertarians.
They're just people who want to shoot guns and smoke weed and don't give a fuck how much burns down so they can.
There needs to be a name for these morons who are always contradicting themselves. Bernie Bros who try to jump on the Libertarian train don't seem to understand anything.
Most libertarians these days are leftists.
Bernie bros works for me.
He says he's a liberal coming from hippie parents and supports all the failed left candidates, and somehow in your mind, he ended up a libertarian?
Did he pass on to you the staff he smokes or something?
You're right, I shouldn't call him a libertarian, even though his fanbase is mostly self-proclaimed libertarians.
So if your clients are commies, then you're a commie - despite you saying you're maga and acting in a maga way.
That's ... uh ... an extremely high IQ way of thinking that surpasses my humble reasoning capabilities, to say the least. Would you give me some hints on joining mensa, you know, as a fellow pede?
What is the purpose of clarifying your distinctions here? They don't give prizes for sorting out which faggot is from anti-Trump Camp A or anti-Trump Camp B.
Unrealistic (read: stupid) remarks require cauterizing regardless of their point of origin. Consider it a social service. And while was not acting like a gentleman here, after the indignation period passes you'll have learned something, becoming a better person.
You may want to return to reddit, where they still endlessly squabble over trying to categorize fence-sitting cowards like Joe Rogan.
A druggie
He was an enjoyable part of the excellent ensemble cast of News Radio. I think that's the most notable thing he did before the podcast.
Debatable. I've seen his stand up, I though it was awful.
I've watched his podcast for years - for the guests, not his views or opinions. When he shuts up and listens, great show. When he starts pontificating, he's just a meathead from Boston who's a curdled mess of pot, woo woo mushroom drug bullshit, and sheer ignorance. But I got introduced to some great people via his show, so I just don't pay attention when he hauls his soapbox out. I skip the MMA shows, because I don't watch MMA, and I skip his comic friends mostly. I skipped Bernie, because fuck that noise.
But I'm not following to Spotify. Fuck Spotify. I have issues with that company ANYWAY, along with Pandora, for how they've treated musicians. Not gonna go down that rabbit hole, but trust me, the musicians I know hate Spotify, and say that the majority of musicians who pay attention to their streaming numbers do as well.
Tough guy communist
Definitely seems like the Deep State is going to try as hard as it can to get ahead of O'Keefe before he becomes more mainstream the way they got ahead of Alex Jones. Dismiss them as conspiracy, non-credible so that the normies dismiss it before they even venture into the Redpill areas of the net
Joe needs to fire Jamie. That kid is a moron.
The two cucks deserve each other.
I love of Rogans bitch Jamie cites Newsweek as the source that fact checked Veritas. Newsweek is a joke
All Jamie is good at is following a conversation and Googling along or pulling up shit from Joe’s social media. He’s the best “producer” in the world at this simple task.
He needs to shut his fucking mouth because he can’t interpret what the search functions return in any meaningful way. He’s a glorified Alexa/Siri.
Yeah he gets the shaky triggered voice when talking Trump
Whatever criticisms can be made about Rogan, anybody who's watched him over the years knows he would be vastly more fair than swamp shits like Wallace and the other sleazy CPD cunts. That's the very important thing a lot of people are missing.
Joe might often be a bitch, but it's better than someone who is always a bitch like Chris, or someone like the other bitch who has her head up Nancy's ragged ass
Straight out of the Andrew Breitbart Dojo, O’keefe is going to submit Joe Rogan in round one. Rogan is afraid, he’s never encountered a fighter with this much skill and training.
Joe is a fraud. This love affair some have with him and that tool tim pool is just baffling.
both Tim Pool and Joe Rogan, each, likely got Trump more votes during this election than this whole site.
Their centrist public position allows them to reach the people in the middle in a way no Trump supporter really can.
That said, I think Joe Rogan leans a bit left of center, but more importantly he employs extremely biased 'fact checkers' on his show, whom he seems to trust.
I honestly don't know if he is a fraud, of he is getting slowly corrupted by his SJW staffers - many times when I tuned in to his show, I watched him ask for a fact check and get MSM talking points back.
He is a trend runner, a click baiter, a social chameleon who sits on the fence and takes on whatever position it takes. He is a headline jockey too, so he can sound smart but he is actually mostly just a moron.
my take on him is he does his best to be non-confrontational with every guest he gets to come on his show.
Which is why he actually gets guests from all sides of the spectrum.
If he set a hard position on anything, people who oppose that position, wouldn't come on to his show.
you are not wrong, but social chameleons have their value. They are one of the few remaining bridges that connect political divides. There is a reason the left has been targeting Joe Rogan so heavily these last months (Spotify employees actively trying to harass Spotify into somehow going back on the deal they made with Rogan and compel him to give up editorial control of the show).
Joe Rogan, from what I heard is literally the biggest podcast voice in english speaking world. His reach is mostly due to him being a fence-sitter and his audience mostly acknowledges that his role is to just be a sounding-board for whatever guest is on his show that day.
Tim is awesome. He at least gives perspective from both sides. Joe used to be a bit more objective but he’s gotten in line with the machine
Well Rogan at least said he would vote for Trump before he'd vote for Biden.
He also described Biden's mind as a "flashlight with a dying battery" that you know isn't going to make it.
Heh, loves Thailand, gnomesain?
Rogan switches to whatever side his guest is on.
Tencent(China) heavily invests into spotify. STOP paying for spotify, and stop using it in general. Joe Rogan is now heavily cucked, at least before he was cucked of his own free will. Now he is forced to shill
Tencent has money in everything now.
It's a little (a lot) concerning.
Wow this video is SOLID GOLD. Probably the best veritas lol
Funny how people try to justify video proof of wrongdoing as not being real. That's like gaslighting.
He should just have James Okeefe on. Problem solved!
Joe Rogan is now OWNED. No longer impartial.
Owned by China. Tencent, just like reddit, owns about 10% of spotify.
Never saw the draw to Rogan. Texas should kick him out! Lol
joe rogans just another retarded libertarian "free weed bro" yeah he was never one of us in the first place
Rogan generally admits when he fucks up. Having O'Keefe on the JRE would be a good way to clear this matter up.
WTF do they even mean by "not real"? Like computer generated? Or are they implying the guy is an actor or something? The guy is not an actor. He's been interviewed by the news. He really is a democrat campaigner.
You know what's going on here? They're afraid because Omar is black, and criticizing a black person is racist, and Rogan has to walk on eggshells now that the woke Spotify controls him.
It's so funny because that's a common tactic of the left wing media: blowing a situation to its largest possible proportion.
It's like when they harped on "Russians hacking the election." What does that mean? Does it mean soft entry into ballot machines and changing results? Does it mean physical disposal or fabrication of ballots? Does it mean a mass disinformation campaign with an equally great wave of regret? No! It was just 10 Facebook accounts owned by Russians, which, in the broadest sense of the word, is "hacking an election."
Mmmm gulp those globalist balls you short little cuck.
Rogan looks terribly unhealthy. Tired and stressed out. He is being obviously being blackmailed with some of his pedo past.
That's what happens when you lose your pride. He got down on his knees to suck molochs dick for some extra money. Hope a bigger house was worth it.
Joe needs to put down the bong because clearly he's losing touch with reality and basic common sense.
He won’t have O’Keefe on. Not a chance. He may have before Spotify but no way he does it now.
Fucking destroyed Rogan here
My guess is Rogan will never have another conservative guest on his show. Has he had any, since he switched over to Spotify?
I unsubbed and blocked his channels, the moment all the right wingers were left out of the library transfer, so I wouldnt know.
Fuck Joe Rogan, hes a liberal that fled CA shithole for TX and took his shitty liberal disease that created the shithole he fled to TX with him.
GO CHECK THE YOUTUBE COMMENTS (before Google messes with them). They are all calling out Rogan. Gives hope, a lot of people seeing through Rogans BS on this one. I don’t mind him from time to time, but this was total shill-mode.
I like Joe because his guests are entertaining or informative, more often than not. Joe himself, is, as he says, just a regular f**king idiot. Joe isn't an expert in MOST of the things he discusses on his podcast outside of MMA, Comedy, and getting high. He's a talk show host basically but in a more informative format.
Always thought Rogan was a very low IQ individual
Rogan has always been a low iq cunt. Why people thought more of him is a question that cannot be answered.
Joe Rogan is stupid as hammered shit and I can't believe people ever believed he was anything but a meathead retard leftist twat.
GET FUCKED JOE ROGAN, VERITAS MEANS TRUTH AND YOU ARE A COMMUNIST LACKEY