These signs are put out by the road. You know, where burried water and electric lines are, that a utilities worker might be servicing. So a utilities worker may need to move the sign to do their job, which was the first example I gave of someone having legitimate reasons to be on his property.
I'm very sorry your intuition is so underdeveloped that you need every last detail of a hypothetical situation spelled out for you to understand it. Try harder next time!
The situation described in the article from the post is not a hypothetical situation, that is a real life event. If you don't know what "hypothetical" means, then good luck buddy.
Why did you bother replying to me if you still have made no attempt to look up what hypothetical means?
At no point have I made any excuses on behalf of the city employee from the story in the article from the screenshot or speculated on whether the homeowner acted maliciously, was involved in boobytraping that particular sign or how the police should handle this.
You see, the comment I replied to initially was stating that boobytraps should be fully legal and his right to use on private property. I have given examples of why boobytraping your sign is and should remain illegal and then further elaborated on them. However, the bulk of the argument I made was not in response to boobytrapped Trump signs but boobytraps in general, such as the guy who wants to install a "porch bomb" the people who want to make "vietcong style bamboo spike pit traps" or the people who want motion activated sprinklers that spray capsaicin laden bird repellent. That is what this discussion is about. If you can't wrap your head around that, stop replying.
These signs are put out by the road. You know, where burried water and electric lines are, that a utilities worker might be servicing. So a utilities worker may need to move the sign to do their job, which was the first example I gave of someone having legitimate reasons to be on his property.
I'm very sorry your intuition is so underdeveloped that you need every last detail of a hypothetical situation spelled out for you to understand it. Try harder next time!
The situation described in the article from the post is not a hypothetical situation, that is a real life event. If you don't know what "hypothetical" means, then good luck buddy.
Why did you bother replying to me if you still have made no attempt to look up what hypothetical means?
At no point have I made any excuses on behalf of the city employee from the story in the article from the screenshot or speculated on whether the homeowner acted maliciously, was involved in boobytraping that particular sign or how the police should handle this.
You see, the comment I replied to initially was stating that boobytraps should be fully legal and his right to use on private property. I have given examples of why boobytraping your sign is and should remain illegal and then further elaborated on them. However, the bulk of the argument I made was not in response to boobytrapped Trump signs but boobytraps in general, such as the guy who wants to install a "porch bomb" the people who want to make "vietcong style bamboo spike pit traps" or the people who want motion activated sprinklers that spray capsaicin laden bird repellent. That is what this discussion is about. If you can't wrap your head around that, stop replying.