Every moderator is biased to certain degree so trying to find unbiased one to moderate debate is pointless. Instead they should bring one with obvious conservative bias (Hannity/Gutfeld) and one with obvious liberal bias (Maddow/Cooper).
This way both sides will be challenged every time they want to avoid to answer a question.
Yeah, this ivy league debate format hasn't truly ever felt like a debate. Its always one guy saying his piece, being interrupted, then cut off by the moderator, and then like clockwork, CNN declares the democrat the winner. I am over that format. The above idea is nice, and if we could get legit candidates, that would make for a more convincing, legit political landscape, and probably even weed out the extremists. I dont mind seeing them argue, but i cant atand a "moderator" moderating only one side. And this could probably bring out more like Trump, who just tell it like it is.
Debate organization should be dumped altogether.