Because it shows that the "neutral" moderator is asking Trump's political enemies for instructions on how they should interact with him. Its huge. Real evidence of collusion between the debate committee and the left.
This was almost certainly meant to be a DM, but the idiot moderator sent a tweet instead.
Quite frankly the answer is obvious - in order to ensure the integrity of something as important as presidential debates the moderator should be removed. Hacked or not, there is no way to prove otherwise. At this point there is conflict of interest and not enough time to conduct a proper investigation (and also no point - just replace him there are plenty of other potential moderators.)
So Mooch responded to a hacked tweet??
The “hacked tweet” says
“Should I respond to Trump”???????
And what’s the big deal about that? Why even claim it was hacked???
This makes no sense to me
Because it shows that the "neutral" moderator is asking Trump's political enemies for instructions on how they should interact with him. Its huge. Real evidence of collusion between the debate committee and the left.
This was almost certainly meant to be a DM, but the idiot moderator sent a tweet instead.
Quite frankly the answer is obvious - in order to ensure the integrity of something as important as presidential debates the moderator should be removed. Hacked or not, there is no way to prove otherwise. At this point there is conflict of interest and not enough time to conduct a proper investigation (and also no point - just replace him there are plenty of other potential moderators.)