240
Comments (15)
sorted by:
7
Trumper007 7 points ago +7 / -0

the 94.6 is actually 99.6 with 1 comorbidity

3
Arden 3 points ago +3 / -0

What's the 20-49 with 0 comorbidity?

3
Filo76 3 points ago +3 / -0

Iโ€™d venture a guess and say the 70+ range scales dramatically the closer you get to 80 or 90. And think of all the comorbidities too.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
Ninki333 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tiger parent activated.

3
fthecoup 3 points ago +3 / -0

These numbers are wrong and misleading. All Chinavirus infected people will eventually die.

2
Bananapirate 2 points ago +2 / -0

*There's

2
stonetears4fears 2 points ago +2 / -0

Donโ€™t come at me with your racist math. Weโ€™re all gonna die.

1
Dudemanfoo 1 point ago +1 / -0

PRESIDENTS 100%

1
CosmoKramer 1 point ago +1 / -0

shut up and wear your mask, bigot

1
NuclearRocks1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Better odds then the population life expectancy ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

1
Scrub_Anon [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was wondering how long it would take for someone to point out my typo.

1
TrumpLovesPussy 1 point ago +1 / -0

also you have to catch it first

1
NancyPeloci 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would like to see 70-80 in it's own category and 80+.

1
Nostaws 1 point ago +1 / -0

You must be racist, sexist and an arachnophobe if you think the entire world being shutdown to save the lives of 14 pensioners isn't worth it, nazi