People disagree with your cut and paste. Those people are legal scholars of the Constitution. There's a reason why we have courts, because it's open for interpretation and argument.
Just because something hasn't happened doesn't mean it can't or won't. Legal scholars disagree with one another. The Supreme Court is going to be involved in this election is my guess. And I wouldn't be surprised, given the fuckery, if The Hag doesn't at least try to become acting President while the arguments are carried out in the court.
https://online.hillsdale.edu/courses/constitution-101
Must not forget the Federalist Papers to go along with it.
You're not absolutely correct. It is arguable that the Speaker could become acting-President.
People disagree with your cut and paste. Those people are legal scholars of the Constitution. There's a reason why we have courts, because it's open for interpretation and argument.
Just because something hasn't happened doesn't mean it can't or won't. Legal scholars disagree with one another. The Supreme Court is going to be involved in this election is my guess. And I wouldn't be surprised, given the fuckery, if The Hag doesn't at least try to become acting President while the arguments are carried out in the court.
Have a good evening!