88
Comments (28)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
AloweiseEdelHuberIII 4 points ago +4 / -0

Didn’t say that, they said they’re protecting antifa by saying this guy was not antifa at the outset then the media will bury the story saying he was not antifa. Thanks cops.

4
Wtf_socialismreally 4 points ago +4 / -0

You know I have to agree.

The cops are always instantly "motives unclear" when a Trump supporter gets shot, and cover for AntiFA / BLM by saying "no affiliation" in five seconds flat.

It should not get any cop in trouble to release a non-answer or an affirmative, so why do they never?

Why does it keep falling on 4chan and The Donald to find this information and disseminate it?

People are losing faith in cops on the right too, and they would do well to defend the only ones who support them (provided, of course, we don't go out and murder someone like this)

If they keep on the path they're going on, they're going to end up alone with no support and no opposition to them losing their jobs.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just like people who are tired of "muh rank and file" argument with the FBI, they're tired of hearing it with cops.

All they have to do is not make statements in either way then. But no, instead it's always "not AntiFA"

-1
Yawnz13 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Except they aren't "protecting antifa". That would be the county DA's. Who do you think is arrested antifa for Federal charges? Hint: the police.