1944
()
posted ago by trump_45 ago by trump_45 +1944 / -0
Comments (37)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
44
IWI9000 44 points ago +44 / -0

How is that not a violation of the first amendment?

25
deleted 25 points ago +25 / -0
20
TheOutlawPepeWales 20 points ago +20 / -0

Yeah, that's still a load of manure. Have you ever seen Hollywood?

8
Current_Year_Acct 8 points ago +8 / -0

Man, there really is nothing about California that appeals.

3
HistoryInvestigator 3 points ago +3 / -0

Times Square is another one.

2
TheOutlawPepeWales 2 points ago +2 / -0

Vegas is completely bonkers. I only brought up Hollywood because it's in the same authority's jurisdiction, which illustrates their politically-motivated bias. You can't be okay with Sunset Blvd and claim this was a distraction.

2
DickTick 2 points ago +2 / -0

Come on dude be realistic l! you can just look at a picture of it and tell it's totally safe and not distracting at all!!!!

12
DickTick 12 points ago +12 / -0

But the Hollywood sign that is over twice as big and infinitely more famous is totally not distracting at all! It gets a big ole check mark on its safety box!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
IWI9000 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks!

2
Forty_Five 2 points ago +2 / -0

So if it's art it's miraculously no longer a safety concern?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0