Imagine if someone went to court because they felt it was wrong that people on organ donor wait lists in some states wait far less time to get a life saving organ than in other states. They demand all state lists be abolished and there be established a national list instead.

Sounds sort of logical right? That is, until the first organ becomes available in Alaska during a huge snow storm and the lucky winner of the next organ is some retired real estate agent in Florida. We can see this is a bad idea. OK so we tell the "national organ list choice" advocate to just move to the state that has the shortest wait time. You are allowed to move to whichever state you feel is in your best organ donation interests after all. Nope. That's not acceptable either. Having to move to another state for medical reasons is not fair. Not fair at all!

That is Roe v Wade

If Roe v Wade went poof today would abortion suddenly be banned from sea to sea? Not a chance in hell. Some states would allow babies to be chocked to death with their own umbilical cord, others would be more restrictive. Even in the restrictive states however, what stops a woman from ordering an abortion pill (RU-486) from a sympathetic pharmacy the same day they miss their first period? Nothing. Who would know about it? How could it be prevented? The emergence of the abortion pill has exposed just how flimsy RvW always was.

in 1973 abortion was made easier in all states because some lady didn't want to pay $50 for a bus ride to an abortion friendly state. Nowadays I guarantee you that these necessary-for-woman-health abortion pills would be handed out for free by any number of sex health charities. The "unequal protection under the law argument" has been nullified.

I myself am pro choice (I dread the thought of forced 18 years of child support payments) but I can't stand the lies that are so willingly gobbled down by those on the left that defend abortion. I understand how the sausage is made. I don't like it, but i want my sausage darn it.

An abortion today consists of the forced premature birth of a human "fetus" (its a baby, I get it, but lets use the terminology that both sides can seek middle ground on), this "fetus" squirms around and has a heartbeat just as if it were a real human baby (shocked face here). This "fetus" is then killed via traumatic resection (cutting out via vivisection) of its most valuable oxygenated organs, until the heart is then removed. I don't like it. I don't want to see it. But.... I don't want 18 years of forced child support payments.

Abortions are not "hoovering out nonviable clumps of cells." There are pills to take nowadays that take care of these clumps of cells. If a woman in her first month of pregnancy went to PP for an abortion she would be handed an abortion pill and be sent home, or be told to come back in 5 months when her fetus's organs would actually have a resale value (Would PP have a name for this I wonder? "Fattening up the calf?" "Ripen the fruits?" They would likely need a code word for it like is done with "pizza" and "hot dogs" and "walnut sauce")

There would be no "back alley abortions" if abortion were made illegal. There are pills to take nowadays. Additionally, there will be uber abortion friendly states that can be visited for the "procedure."

Abortion rights are not under attack by a bunch of religious men who want to control women. Support for abortion is about the same between the sexes. People who object to abortion don't like the idea of pulling a squirming "baby" out of its womb who then flinches and reacts to pain as its bodily organs are dug out with melon ballers. I for one greatly respect the compassion that causes people to object to the killing of "fetuses" in such a gruesome manner. (but, again, do it where I can't see it because I don't want 18 years of forced child support payments).

Ralph Northam came under fire for saying that newly born babies should be allowed to be killed under Virginia abortion laws, but what is egregiously left out is the manner of death. That baby would not be killed via helium or some kind of opioid overdose. No no no.... there are valuable organs and stem cells that the research market will pay a ton of money for. The baby would be killed just like how any other fetus is harvested for its organs. The heart will be left beating to oxygenate the organs until the last moment as one by once the organs are incised from the body to be hustled off and sold to the highest bidder. Last, the heart will be "Aztec'ed" out of the body and sold off as well.

Project Veritas exposed all this detail about how abortions work and not one person in the media said: "Wait a minute. THAT'S an abortion? I thought an abortion was removing an unviable mass of cells and then quickly incinerating it!"

A "Born alive" executive order is garlic to the left because every single abortion involves the bearing alive of a human. What? Did we think that organ harvesting from fetuses was done like some perverse "deconstruct a ship in a bottle" technique while still in the mother's womb?