5560
Well boys, it was fun while it lasted. (media.patriots.win) πŸ‚ Bullshit πŸ’©
posted ago by DefaultFreedom ago by DefaultFreedom +5560 / -0
Comments (310)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
7
kissmyasthma100 7 points ago +8 / -1

Betting sites are a good 'poll' although is not looking good for Trump either.

10
zooty 10 points ago +10 / -0

They're good if you can assume people are rational. TDS throws a spanner in the works there.

1
TheFountainhead 1 point ago +2 / -1

Spanner? Which English colony did you used to be a part of fellow pede?

1
zooty 1 point ago +1 / -0

No colony at all*. The original Blighty.

(*Unless you count the Spanish, the Celts, the Angles, the Saxons, the Jutes, the Vikings, the Romans, the French and probably half a dozen others).

1
TheFountainhead 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah well in that case, carry on. And do keep up the pressure on Downing Street to restore Britain to glory.

5
TheFountainhead 5 points ago +5 / -0

Predict it is trending the same (kinda) as it did in β€˜16 so they must be making odds on the same info. They don’t care a whole lot frankly who wins anyhow. They get their cut.

1
Visvires 1 point ago +1 / -0

Predict it doesn't make the odds; their traders do. If you think, as I do, that Trump is more than 36% likely to win then you can, as I did, purchase $1 Biden-no contracts at 36 cents each. And this will drive the price up...

1
UpTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

And how did the betting look in 2016? Wasn't it the exact same thing?

1
Visvires 1 point ago +1 / -0

Worse, IIRC. Trump trading below ten cents. Some people made bank.

4
ModernKnight 4 points ago +5 / -1

The bookies know when a fix is in.

3
FireannDireach 3 points ago +3 / -0

Betting sites were for Hillary in '16, too. A lot of degenerate gamblers and Libs lost their shirts.

2
liberalnevermore 2 points ago +2 / -0

They were against Trump in 2016 too iirc. One even paid out for Hillary winning before the election (as a publicity stunt, though).