Predict it is trending the same (kinda) as it did in β16 so they must be making odds on the same info. They donβt care a whole lot frankly who wins anyhow. They get their cut.
Predict it doesn't make the odds; their traders do. If you think, as I do, that Trump is more than 36% likely to win then you can, as I did, purchase $1 Biden-no contracts at 36 cents each. And this will drive the price up...
Betting sites are a good 'poll' although is not looking good for Trump either.
They're good if you can assume people are rational. TDS throws a spanner in the works there.
Spanner? Which English colony did you used to be a part of fellow pede?
No colony at all*. The original Blighty.
(*Unless you count the Spanish, the Celts, the Angles, the Saxons, the Jutes, the Vikings, the Romans, the French and probably half a dozen others).
Ah well in that case, carry on. And do keep up the pressure on Downing Street to restore Britain to glory.
Predict it is trending the same (kinda) as it did in β16 so they must be making odds on the same info. They donβt care a whole lot frankly who wins anyhow. They get their cut.
Predict it doesn't make the odds; their traders do. If you think, as I do, that Trump is more than 36% likely to win then you can, as I did, purchase $1 Biden-no contracts at 36 cents each. And this will drive the price up...
And how did the betting look in 2016? Wasn't it the exact same thing?
Worse, IIRC. Trump trading below ten cents. Some people made bank.
The bookies know when a fix is in.
Betting sites were for Hillary in '16, too. A lot of degenerate gamblers and Libs lost their shirts.
They were against Trump in 2016 too iirc. One even paid out for Hillary winning before the election (as a publicity stunt, though).