Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
I've often described myself in debates as interpreting 2A much more radically than groups like NRA. Because seriously, if cannons would've made sense to man 24/7, these original Americans would've absolutely had those set up on their great estates. They believed in everyone having access to the up to date weaponry of the time. If that means grenades and howitzers and rocket launchers, then yes please. (And I don't even own a gun.)
Semi is better for killing lots of people fast. Auto is better for suppressing and wounding lots of people fast. Ride them sights, pull when they line up with hearts and minds.
I like to throw in two grenades, the first one on a high pop and the second one right in so they can't take proper cover, then I rush in with the combat shotgun before they can recover. Sixteen rounds of buckshot will clear out the entire house front to back.
Thats a nice LARP, but I've actually killed people with a glock in Afghanistan. If you'd like to discuss really how to kill with a pistol, Im here. If you wanna write 80s action movie scenes, please continue...
I appreciate artificially stupid enemies. Let them destroy themselves on their own dime. Why can't they off themselves before they become a threat to the rest of humanity?
What, you are hoping they cure cancer?
Those people will find a way to destroy themselves no matter what you make legal or illegal. So why not leave it criminalized and use the courts to lock them up?
Why lock them up? Seriously? To protect them? From what? The World is tough. It's worse if you are stupid.
They could buy a pound of heroin at Wally World. $5, at real world prices. They shoot up, slow their heartbeat to once a week. Who loses? Cardboard box, at county expense, buried by someone working off a traffic ticket. The problem would be self-correcting.
The idea of government issue social engineering is only 120 years old. It doesn't work. People have never been more miserable.
Might reduce drug related crime. Like how alcoholics dont break into peoples houses for alcohol money cause they can try and steal a bottle and its a misdemeanor not a felony.
I fear we will never have real leader like Trump who work for us. I have no idea what will happen after Trump’s next term but hopefully most people wake up and stop voting for these career politicians that hate us.
I think Cruz or DeSantis would both look out for us. Maybe not to the extent of Trump but they seem like legitimately good people. Noem too.
Trump Jr? Gatez? Tucker?
Cruz can run for higher office when he's done something about the tech companies beyond mean tweets. If he didn't wanna play ball, shouldn't have gone to bat. Not the kinda person we need. Texas needs new Senators ASAP, like most states.
Well, He will run for higher office whether you like it or not to be honest.
Cruz is one of the only conservatives being outspoken and actually trying to do something about antifa as a terrorist organization. I think during the “meeting” or whatever it was THREE other Republicans showed up?
I was just thinking of feasible options. We can honestly find something wrong with just about anybody but what good does that do? Many probably said the same things about Trump in 2012 ish in regards to him potentially running for President.
Libs might be able get behind desantis.....might. Desantis gave Florida 20k acres in aquatic preservation. Which is HUGE win for a fishermen like me. Too many New Yorkers coming to my state and keeping illegal size fish. Need more areas for fish to breed in safety.
Exactly this. Media and the silicon valley fucks combined with the schools are just about impossible to overcome peacefully. Theyll just brainwash your kids to hate everything you believe in.
During the 2nd Trump term following should be included:
Breaking teacher unions and creating a voucher system
Complete implementation of enforcement of teaching racism garbage, such as "critical race theory"
Self hating private institutions preaching blm and stuff, lose a way to get federal tax funds and should carry a mandatory penalties under the Anticommunist statutes
Anti-trust action against FB, google, Amazon and similiar
move many of the federal institutions from Washington DC to the mainland of America. WY, Idaho, Montana
Conservatives can't win a game where the other side cheats and changes the rules. That time has passed. Marxist democrats don't have any regard for law, tradition, or individual rights.
I'm frustrated as the next person regarding the state of many of our laws and the world for that matter.
However, I do believe you should take a break from politics for a few days. You sound a bit unhinged. It's not healthy man and will lead to a dark place.
Fucking CBS had a tweet last night linking to an article in which they called "originalism" a controversial school of thought. Originalism, interpreting the constitution as it is written, is controversial. What the fuck happened.
Well, it actually used to be. Scalia was the first Justice to adhere to Originalism in a long time. He revolutionized the legal thinking in his own time. The fact we have so many Originalists now is directly the doing of Antonin Scalia.
Because no matter how they try to spin what is in there to fit 'their daily BS to feed the sheep', they would have to shit on stuff as they always do. Because nothing in these legal documented papers fits their narrative. So they shit on it in a different way.
Unfortunately the Democrats hold many seats in the Senate so they get to have their say. Better spent confirming another Justice than being stacked on pallets and shipped to radical Islamic terrorists in Iran like Obama did.
I dunno. Showing up and voting yes are two different issues. Turtle says we have the votes, but does that include RINOs, and does it equate to 51? I guess we shall see.
Fun fact: If they intend to block the vote via not showing up, and if this happens for over three consecutive days, the Senate will be considered to be in recess, enabling Trump to make a recess appointment.
Dems can't block the vote. Pelosi has said as much. Justice Barret will be confirmed the week of the 26th, roughly a week before the election. Her vote on the SCOTUS my very well save this country from a tumulus election of dems insisting on a never ending counting of ballots. She may save us from dems stealing the election like they tried in 2000.
Fun fact: If they intend to block the vote via not showing up, and if this happens for over three consecutive days, the Senate will be considered to be in recess, enabling Trump to make a recess appointment.
You guys should watch the new Crowder change my mind about ACB. All the college students legitimately think judges make laws. They don't even understand the role of the judiciary... It's frustrating, yet sad.
People are dumb everywhere. I won't say where or when, but I was once working a campaign for a person running for the state house who at a campaign dinner described how each state's legislature received bills from the US Congress and then would vote for or against federal bills to be implemented as law in each state. We all drank a bunch of the free liquor and GTFO and our participation in that local GOP committee ceased.
Lol that'd be such a strange system if that were the case. Only thing we have remotely close to that is the ratification of constitutional amendments, but that's obviously still very different.
It was a weird evening to say the least. Most people in the room were looking at each other horrified, but a good 10% of the room didn't seem fazed. I like to think that they were drunk and not listening, but I don't know. I was just astounded that he got as far as to win the district's nomination, and that nobody had sounded the alarm before maybe mid October that our candidate was a dolt. IIRC he was a restaraunteur, so maybe he thought the federal system worked like franchises or something. So weird.
Their only principle is “Orange Man Bad” and they will Orwell themselves into believing whatever position is necessary to push that principle, no matter how contradictory the positions are.
To be fair, I've seen Crowder stumped a time or two in these segments. They obviously pick the ones for their final video cut they think will get the most clicks for their channel. Not saying that's a bad thing - just saying they should be watched with a grain of salt, and the college campus is not necessarily entirely reflected by the 3-5 people shown in each of Crowder's segments.
Their personalities mirror what they see on Twitter, and so they think the only appropriate way to interact socially is to mirror NPC bullshit. Logic and consistency is something long lost of them.
Did Trump piss him off? Or does the "deep state" have dirt on him and control him? Probably has nothing to do with his name being on the epstien flight logs.
Exactly. I'm tired of people giving excuses that someone was "pissed off". People, this isn't middle school. Nobody is "pissed off" and that's the reason they disregard constitutional law. We all have to work with people who we hate but we still do our jobs. These people have done things that they're now terrified will come out which is why they seem "pissed" at Trump. Same for the celebs. They all loved Trump before he ran. Why did they suddenly start hating him? They didn't. They all have skeletons in their closet that they're terrified will come out. THATS why they "hate Trump"
tbh Trump should just say "fuck it" and drop everything he's got on Hollyweird. Blow this shit wide open. They deserve it. They make him look bad, and honestly if it wasn't for Hollyweird and the MSM Trump would have a 65+% approval rating
The saddest part of these hearings is listening to lawmakers who simply dont understand....that if they write a law thats actually legal...they dont have to worry about the fucking court.
They want to pass unconstitutional laws. Freedom gets in the way of their plans for this country. They hate the fact that in America you can say and think what you please, that we have the right to bear arms, etc.
Last night I had a dream that RBG was stuffed into a NASCAR race to show how strong and brave she is. She crashed and died of course, but in a replay of the race it was revealed that someone else was driving the car while her already dead corpse was piled on top of him.
Citizen doesn't want to follow law. Thinks law violates freedom.
Citizen sues government.
Lower court (eg. 9th circuit) hears case, makes ruling.
Citizen or Government appeals the case to Supreme Court and the supreme court after a process ("cert", short for Certiorari) agrees to hear the case and make a ruling on whether the law passed by the legislature falls within the scope of the powers of government granted by the Constitution (ie. whether or not a law is "constitutional")
You can see why Leftists hate "conservative" SCOTUS judges because the Constitution is clear on the limitations of government. The founders did not want a powerful government, because a powerful government by nature limits the liberty of the individual. If the Constitution is followed, Leftists cannot make totalitarian laws. They hate that.
If y’all can’t spell her name right just use her initials! Have some respect for Amy Coney Barrett lol I have seen way too much of this today and yesterday.
She's going to recuse. Another fucking Sessions imo, sorry Pedes.
Watching and listening to her when she was pushed by a Dem senator to "commit" to recusing regarding decisions involving a "disputed election". Of course Dems claim Trump is pushing to get her confirmed so she'll vote for him in a Supreme Court decision (i.e the 'appearance'). She claimed she would take "very seriously" any "appearance of bias", ...didn't have to be any facts just the wishy washy "appearance" which Judges pretend to avoid like the plague. And on that basis implied that she would recuse. She also implied that she couldn't give a committment to recuse right there and then because of legal reasons which she had pointed to previously.
My two cents...she's going to be the classic professional bureaucrat and, where possible in controversial or side-taking issues, PASS THE BUCK (i.e recuse). She's going to fuck the country because of this and then feign innocence and decency about the 'integrity of the law'--blah, blah, blah.
Regarding "appearance of bias", no other Trump hating Judge has worried about this.
Also, surely "appearance of bias" goes with the job. EVERY losing side in a case usually complains that the Judge was 'biased'. So what?
Obviously getting ahead of things here; pray that she doesn't recuse...but Pedes better be ready for this MASSIVE disappointment when it comes to the crunch (as it will). AND BE PREPARED.
What I'm seeing right now, is some senator trying to re try the obama care law. The senator is telling the judge what the law says. " It's supposed to cover as many people as possible. " Write laws that say what they mean. If it isn't clear it's unconstitutionally vague. They do this on purpose so they can have activist judges read into it what they want.
But she's wrong here. The left's judges are perfectly happy to walk in with their own agenda and impose their will on the world. Therefore we must consider all leftist judges decisions to lack precedent over any future cases.
However (there's always one of those) the stunt NY pulled needs a good hard beat down. This crap of passing an unconstitutional law, letting it get to appeal to SCOTUS, and then re-writing it to walk just up to the infringement line before the court takes it has got to stop.
Some justices agree with that but not enough of them.
Repeal the NFA, abolish the ATF. Silencers and automatic pew pews for every law abiding citizen!
Turrets behind every blade of grass!
You just described my dream home defense system.
Meh, needs more molten lava, and lava sharks with laser beams on their heads.
only if I can shoot the lava somehow out of a firearm
id be happy with just lava moat and turrets
CNN: Amy Cony-Barrett: “I have an agenda ... I like guns ... I hate abortion"
I wouldn't be surprised in the least of the media twisted her words like that; it's what they do. Even fox.
I only go to TDW, the treehouse, Bongino...that's about it!
Oh yeah, Legal Insurrection, which really should have much more traffic than it gets!
😂
Lord Rogal Dorn, is that you?!
I've often described myself in debates as interpreting 2A much more radically than groups like NRA. Because seriously, if cannons would've made sense to man 24/7, these original Americans would've absolutely had those set up on their great estates. They believed in everyone having access to the up to date weaponry of the time. If that means grenades and howitzers and rocket launchers, then yes please. (And I don't even own a gun.)
But what is a weapon of mass destruction, and more importantly, who defines it?? 🤔🙄
They owned entire warships back in the day.
Defending your own life is an inalienable right that the government is tasked with securing.
But agenda-driven power-hungry domestic enemies have flipped government's purpose over its own head.
I'd love an 88mm erika plays in the distance
oh hell yea
https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/2015-06/29/20/enhanced/webdr10/anigif_original-grid-image-29813-1435624705-5.gif?crop=333:220;0,7%7D
100% yes. 2nd amendment demands parity of arms for civilians and military. Anything less is infringement.
go further. I want rocket launchers and everything else the military has.
You can't even buy a pistol in another state without an unconstitutional transfer.
I want sharks with laser beams attached to their frickin' heads!
Sure would be nice to have R2D2 mounted on my roof. Brrrrrrrrrrt! Problem gone.
I need a integrally suppressed super shorty 300 blk with a giggle switch and it's none of the government's business.
You just described my spirit animal.
I would legitimately conceal carry a Glock 18. Especially in these riotous times.
Semi is better for killing lots of people fast. Auto is better for suppressing and wounding lots of people fast. Ride them sights, pull when they line up with hearts and minds.
I like to throw in two grenades, the first one on a high pop and the second one right in so they can't take proper cover, then I rush in with the combat shotgun before they can recover. Sixteen rounds of buckshot will clear out the entire house front to back.
These minecraft strats are top tier
Thats a nice LARP, but I've actually killed people with a glock in Afghanistan. If you'd like to discuss really how to kill with a pistol, Im here. If you wanna write 80s action movie scenes, please continue...
Does you vision include buying them at gas stations?
I mean...depending on where in the US you are thats a thing. In my future I see something even better: vending machines.
"Take this $100 and go grab your Uncle Dave something from the Coke machine."
No, liquor stores/cannibus/opioid stores. Explain why the feds should be in the drug business, except to enforce price supports for smugglers.
Big nah on your degeneracy stores.
I appreciate artificially stupid enemies. Let them destroy themselves on their own dime. Why can't they off themselves before they become a threat to the rest of humanity? What, you are hoping they cure cancer?
Those people will find a way to destroy themselves no matter what you make legal or illegal. So why not leave it criminalized and use the courts to lock them up?
Because then you are spending money on the prison system, rather than making money on the tax, until they decide to destroy themselves (if they do).
Because there is no reason cannabis and alcohol should be treated any different.
ESPECIALLY considering alcohol quite literally kills hundreds daily
Why lock them up? Seriously? To protect them? From what? The World is tough. It's worse if you are stupid.
They could buy a pound of heroin at Wally World. $5, at real world prices. They shoot up, slow their heartbeat to once a week. Who loses? Cardboard box, at county expense, buried by someone working off a traffic ticket. The problem would be self-correcting.
The idea of government issue social engineering is only 120 years old. It doesn't work. People have never been more miserable.
Might reduce drug related crime. Like how alcoholics dont break into peoples houses for alcohol money cause they can try and steal a bottle and its a misdemeanor not a felony.
Reducing crime by decriminalizing it is a leftist argument, doesn't work, and typically an effect of lacking the will to enforce the law.
Decriminalization of alcohol... sooooo leftist...
It's a libertarian position too. You're not my kind of people. That's fine. Dont tell me how to live my life and I wont treat you like Al Qaeda
It's insane to me that tax stamps are what prevents people from exercising their second amendment rights.
I fear we will never have real leader like Trump who work for us. I have no idea what will happen after Trump’s next term but hopefully most people wake up and stop voting for these career politicians that hate us.
I think Cruz or DeSantis would both look out for us. Maybe not to the extent of Trump but they seem like legitimately good people. Noem too. Trump Jr? Gatez? Tucker?
Cruz can run for higher office when he's done something about the tech companies beyond mean tweets. If he didn't wanna play ball, shouldn't have gone to bat. Not the kinda person we need. Texas needs new Senators ASAP, like most states.
The are all playing games. ALL OF THEM. No more career politicians.
Term limits for everyone in government
Check out Missouri Senator Josh Hawley. He's exactly what we need.
Well, He will run for higher office whether you like it or not to be honest.
Cruz is one of the only conservatives being outspoken and actually trying to do something about antifa as a terrorist organization. I think during the “meeting” or whatever it was THREE other Republicans showed up?
I was just thinking of feasible options. We can honestly find something wrong with just about anybody but what good does that do? Many probably said the same things about Trump in 2012 ish in regards to him potentially running for President.
Libs might be able get behind desantis.....might. Desantis gave Florida 20k acres in aquatic preservation. Which is HUGE win for a fishermen like me. Too many New Yorkers coming to my state and keeping illegal size fish. Need more areas for fish to breed in safety.
Illegal fish??
Most, if not all, states have size requirements for keeping fish that you catch.
So far he’s been very pro-MAGA.
If he decides to run in 2024 he would be a strong candidate for my vote.
Don Jr needs to get elected - preferably to governor - somewhere pronto if he wants to be president eventually.
I know The Donald didn't hold any office prior, but that was a miracle frankly.
CA gov
Exactly this. Media and the silicon valley fucks combined with the schools are just about impossible to overcome peacefully. Theyll just brainwash your kids to hate everything you believe in.
During the 2nd Trump term following should be included:
Spread the federal agencies throughout all of America’s state capitals.
I vote for putting the FBI in Alaska.
Conservatives can't win a game where the other side cheats and changes the rules. That time has passed. Marxist democrats don't have any regard for law, tradition, or individual rights.
We need the DOJ back.
Politicians are not elected to be leaders they are elected to parrot what their constituents desire. We are getting what we are voting for.
Trump wouldn't have survived as a senator or house rep. He would have been banned from speaking due to him doing what he believes is right.
Then I guess most Americans want our country to be destroyed cause even most of the republicans are bad.
We as a society need to redefine who we want serving as politicians.
Most people know nothing about the specific policies their candidate supports. It’s just pure “my side good, other side bad.”
My favorite pick is Missouri Senator Josh Hawley.
I certainly hope that GOA can push a solid NFA or AWB/mag cap/features ban lawsuit up the channels to SCOTUS in the next few years.
It's not the job of the SC to question established law. Unless of course that law is challenged?
No, I did not say We are not, I said it is not the job of the SC.
You sound a bit unhinged and may need to take a break from politics
I'm frustrated as the next person regarding the state of many of our laws and the world for that matter.
However, I do believe you should take a break from politics for a few days. You sound a bit unhinged. It's not healthy man and will lead to a dark place.
LOL no wonder the dems dont want her there.
“My God! She’ll actually follow the Constitution thingy. HOW EVIL!” - CNN
Fucking CBS had a tweet last night linking to an article in which they called "originalism" a controversial school of thought. Originalism, interpreting the constitution as it is written, is controversial. What the fuck happened.
It’s “controversial” to the MSM because it doesn’t agree with their lefty bullshit.
Well, it actually used to be. Scalia was the first Justice to adhere to Originalism in a long time. He revolutionized the legal thinking in his own time. The fact we have so many Originalists now is directly the doing of Antonin Scalia.
That's actually a fair point.
Because no matter how they try to spin what is in there to fit 'their daily BS to feed the sheep', they would have to shit on stuff as they always do. Because nothing in these legal documented papers fits their narrative. So they shit on it in a different way.
Retard happened.
Why are we having hearings when the democrats intend on blocking the vote anyway?
To mitigate any accusations that she was "rammed through" and to give the Dems a chance to embarrass themselves like they did with Kavanaugh.
Okay, I guess that's a semi-valid reason. Huge waste of taxpayer dollars, though.
Unfortunately the Democrats hold many seats in the Senate so they get to have their say. Better spent confirming another Justice than being stacked on pallets and shipped to radical Islamic terrorists in Iran like Obama did.
We need Romney's vote. That's basically a democrat vote at this point.
Still doesn't justify the hearings
A hearing like this is a relatively tiny amount of taxpayer dollar.
The whole point of collecting tax dollars is to waste them, so that train has left already.
Govt in general is a huge waste of taxpayer dollars
I dunno. Showing up and voting yes are two different issues. Turtle says we have the votes, but does that include RINOs, and does it equate to 51? I guess we shall see.
Pretty sure we only need 50 with a Mike Pence tiebreak vote.
He's not a Senator, he's the President of the Senate and votes in the event of a tie. A quorum requires the presence of the majority of Senators.
Joe Manchin won't have the balls to skip.
Fun fact: If they intend to block the vote via not showing up, and if this happens for over three consecutive days, the Senate will be considered to be in recess, enabling Trump to make a recess appointment.
Dems can't block the vote. Pelosi has said as much. Justice Barret will be confirmed the week of the 26th, roughly a week before the election. Her vote on the SCOTUS my very well save this country from a tumulus election of dems insisting on a never ending counting of ballots. She may save us from dems stealing the election like they tried in 2000.
Fun fact: If they intend to block the vote via not showing up, and if this happens for over three consecutive days, the Senate will be considered to be in recess, enabling Trump to make a recess appointment.
That's disqualified her from being a judge in the eyes of Democrats.
You guys should watch the new Crowder change my mind about ACB. All the college students legitimately think judges make laws. They don't even understand the role of the judiciary... It's frustrating, yet sad.
People are dumb everywhere. I won't say where or when, but I was once working a campaign for a person running for the state house who at a campaign dinner described how each state's legislature received bills from the US Congress and then would vote for or against federal bills to be implemented as law in each state. We all drank a bunch of the free liquor and GTFO and our participation in that local GOP committee ceased.
Lol that'd be such a strange system if that were the case. Only thing we have remotely close to that is the ratification of constitutional amendments, but that's obviously still very different.
It was a weird evening to say the least. Most people in the room were looking at each other horrified, but a good 10% of the room didn't seem fazed. I like to think that they were drunk and not listening, but I don't know. I was just astounded that he got as far as to win the district's nomination, and that nobody had sounded the alarm before maybe mid October that our candidate was a dolt. IIRC he was a restaraunteur, so maybe he thought the federal system worked like franchises or something. So weird.
Btw did this clown end up winning?
Ha. Nope. He got crushed.
Some one needs to show him some School House Rock civics videos!!!
Yes
Yes
No
??????
They have zero standards. Their view on everything is "I believe in neutrality and equality, so long as I agree with them."
They're conditioned to think anyone who disagrees with them is an evil, evil person. It's mind-blowing...
Their only principle is “Orange Man Bad” and they will Orwell themselves into believing whatever position is necessary to push that principle, no matter how contradictory the positions are.
I just watched that. I'm amazed at how inarticulate these "smart" college kids are. They can't even form a simple argument to support their view.
To be fair, I've seen Crowder stumped a time or two in these segments. They obviously pick the ones for their final video cut they think will get the most clicks for their channel. Not saying that's a bad thing - just saying they should be watched with a grain of salt, and the college campus is not necessarily entirely reflected by the 3-5 people shown in each of Crowder's segments.
Their personalities mirror what they see on Twitter, and so they think the only appropriate way to interact socially is to mirror NPC bullshit. Logic and consistency is something long lost of them.
Luckily they mostly are all noise and no vote. My college had shuttles to the voting location (Obama/Romney), and participation was still low.
Pretty much what John Roberts did. Trump pissed him off and now he's a cuck liberal shitting on the constitution.
Did Trump piss him off? Or does the "deep state" have dirt on him and control him? Probably has nothing to do with his name being on the epstien flight logs.
Exactly. I'm tired of people giving excuses that someone was "pissed off". People, this isn't middle school. Nobody is "pissed off" and that's the reason they disregard constitutional law. We all have to work with people who we hate but we still do our jobs. These people have done things that they're now terrified will come out which is why they seem "pissed" at Trump. Same for the celebs. They all loved Trump before he ran. Why did they suddenly start hating him? They didn't. They all have skeletons in their closet that they're terrified will come out. THATS why they "hate Trump"
tbh Trump should just say "fuck it" and drop everything he's got on Hollyweird. Blow this shit wide open. They deserve it. They make him look bad, and honestly if it wasn't for Hollyweird and the MSM Trump would have a 65+% approval rating
Look up his illegal adoption of his child. There's your dirt.
Article: http://www.project.nsearch.com/m/blogpost?id=4878805%3ABlogPost%3A872960
The saddest part of these hearings is listening to lawmakers who simply dont understand....that if they write a law thats actually legal...they dont have to worry about the fucking court.
That's why they hate her.
They want to pass unconstitutional laws. Freedom gets in the way of their plans for this country. They hate the fact that in America you can say and think what you please, that we have the right to bear arms, etc.
But muh gender fluid = judicial fluid
Last night I had a dream that RBG was stuffed into a NASCAR race to show how strong and brave she is. She crashed and died of course, but in a replay of the race it was revealed that someone else was driving the car while her already dead corpse was piled on top of him.
It was retarded, but it cracked me up.
What the? 😂
Please get ACB in, please.
Seems like common sense - oh that's why they had to explain it like a child to the left!
The left treated RGB like a royal queen on the bench, with that crown bullshit.
Most eloquent!
*coney
2012
Judges can't wake up one day and say, "I like lockdowns. Let's use Jacobson v Massachussetts."
Pretty easy to see why they hate her. She's true to the letter of the law.
The accusations of agenda pushing are an obvious deflection because that is exactly what they intend to do!
She was 100% talking about the now very dead RBG. I'm sure the left hated hearing her say that. CONSTITUTION vs Activist.
This is so embarrassing, our own politicians don't know how the supreme court works or the legal process. And they are making our laws. Scary.
Or, this was a leading question to show people how she respects the legal process.
Yeah, but I think Lindsey asked it on purpose because he knew how stupid his colleagues are
What about a stare decisis on Jacobson?
The problem is you need money to challenge the law. And lots of it...the NRA and republicans needs to fucking wake up and take California back.
I love her accent.
That's where she's wrong. Democrat appointees do just that.
How notorious 😉
We do have an imperious judiciary. Too many judges are tyrannical fucks.
The 2nd amendment will decide our future. Not politicians. Not judges.
Oh, I forgot with all the COVID crap they cant have a bunch of retards running about in the building like last time.
Well except for the retarded Democrat Senators.
...I wouldn't mind if she did though
Nice
I’m not wise to the judicial system. Can someone ELI5 the significance of what ACB is saying?
She explained it pretty clearly:
Legislature (law makers, ie. Congress, Assembly, etc.) passes law.
Citizen doesn't want to follow law. Thinks law violates freedom.
Citizen sues government.
Lower court (eg. 9th circuit) hears case, makes ruling.
Citizen or Government appeals the case to Supreme Court and the supreme court after a process ("cert", short for Certiorari) agrees to hear the case and make a ruling on whether the law passed by the legislature falls within the scope of the powers of government granted by the Constitution (ie. whether or not a law is "constitutional")
You can see why Leftists hate "conservative" SCOTUS judges because the Constitution is clear on the limitations of government. The founders did not want a powerful government, because a powerful government by nature limits the liberty of the individual. If the Constitution is followed, Leftists cannot make totalitarian laws. They hate that.
Thx bro. That makes sense! 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Joe Stalin pulling pipe
"That's where you're wrong"
Smile
If y’all can’t spell her name right just use her initials! Have some respect for Amy Coney Barrett lol I have seen way too much of this today and yesterday.
I see you made an edit in your comment, thanks!!
She's going to recuse. Another fucking Sessions imo, sorry Pedes.
Watching and listening to her when she was pushed by a Dem senator to "commit" to recusing regarding decisions involving a "disputed election". Of course Dems claim Trump is pushing to get her confirmed so she'll vote for him in a Supreme Court decision (i.e the 'appearance'). She claimed she would take "very seriously" any "appearance of bias", ...didn't have to be any facts just the wishy washy "appearance" which Judges pretend to avoid like the plague. And on that basis implied that she would recuse. She also implied that she couldn't give a committment to recuse right there and then because of legal reasons which she had pointed to previously.
My two cents...she's going to be the classic professional bureaucrat and, where possible in controversial or side-taking issues, PASS THE BUCK (i.e recuse). She's going to fuck the country because of this and then feign innocence and decency about the 'integrity of the law'--blah, blah, blah.
Regarding "appearance of bias", no other Trump hating Judge has worried about this.
Also, surely "appearance of bias" goes with the job. EVERY losing side in a case usually complains that the Judge was 'biased'. So what?
Obviously getting ahead of things here; pray that she doesn't recuse...but Pedes better be ready for this MASSIVE disappointment when it comes to the crunch (as it will). AND BE PREPARED.
Unfortunately they can and they do. They shouldn't, but they do.
What I'm seeing right now, is some senator trying to re try the obama care law. The senator is telling the judge what the law says. " It's supposed to cover as many people as possible. " Write laws that say what they mean. If it isn't clear it's unconstitutionally vague. They do this on purpose so they can have activist judges read into it what they want.
Not just RGB that's directed at every single liberal judge out there. haha I love it!!! She's perfect!!
It was perfectly legal for Yankee Clippers on the China Trade to carry a dozen Cannons, scores of muskets, hatchets, and sabres
But she's wrong here. The left's judges are perfectly happy to walk in with their own agenda and impose their will on the world. Therefore we must consider all leftist judges decisions to lack precedent over any future cases.
And just like that, she reveals her bias against agendas.
Sounds like Lindsey Graham snuck in a magazine restriction question. I like that very much. Very smooth and indirect .
Damn, it cut off just as it was getting good!
Judges are there to uphold law according to the constitution. Not to have a personal agenda or opinion. She explained this very well. Good job!
Here you go pedes. Y'all need this in you (what did Piglosi call it?) your QUIVER... kek
The Ginsburg Rule -- send this to Libtard friends and watch their brains explode. Use their own stuff against them. It's a beautiful thing - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoI8LmrBQxM&feature=emb_logo
However (there's always one of those) the stunt NY pulled needs a good hard beat down. This crap of passing an unconstitutional law, letting it get to appeal to SCOTUS, and then re-writing it to walk just up to the infringement line before the court takes it has got to stop.
Some justices agree with that but not enough of them.
Hey hey, ho ho, the NFA has got to go!
Great comment.
Followed by Klobachuar saying, "I'd actually like to be a Queen in here".
GO BACK TO BRITIAN YA WANKA!
Thank you!!!!!! Preach!
BOOM!!! Suck it bitches