Their "logic" is that she can't fairly judge a case on gun rights because she owns a gun? So by their "logic," a non-gun owner can't fairly judge a case on gun rights either.
And what’s extra funny is there’s no real middle ground on this. It’s a binary choice (like gender). Either you own a gun or a you don’t. With their retarded logic there’s no way to judge a case fairly.
"With their retarded logic there’s no way to judge a case fairly."
This IS their logic, and they don't think it is retarded. They think that's the way the world is and should be, only they want only people who believe like them in charge. There are no absolute truths, only their beliefs.
Even though journalism is largely dead in our society, I still think journalists have the right to speak and publish their own personal thoughts on the rights of journalists.
Their "logic" is that she can't fairly judge a case on gun rights because she owns a gun? So by their "logic," a non-gun owner can't fairly judge a case on gun rights either.
And what’s extra funny is there’s no real middle ground on this. It’s a binary choice (like gender). Either you own a gun or a you don’t. With their retarded logic there’s no way to judge a case fairly.
"With their retarded logic there’s no way to judge a case fairly."
This IS their logic, and they don't think it is retarded. They think that's the way the world is and should be, only they want only people who believe like them in charge. There are no absolute truths, only their beliefs.
Their logic is that she owns a gun and therefore will not vote in their preferred direction on gun rights. Which is "unfair" to them.
Oh I'm well aware of their toddler-like thought processes, which is why logic was in quotes. ;)
I know just had to get it off my chest haha
😂 👍
Then a non-parent shouldn't be able to judge abortion.
No, only they get to employ double-standards. 😒
In fact
The only disqualifier would be if she did NOT own a gun
Every judge who doesn't should have to recuse
You took the words right out of my mouth.
Bingo!
Amy has a uterus but could she fairly judge a case on women's reproduction rights?
Even though journalism is largely dead in our society, I still think journalists have the right to speak and publish their own personal thoughts on the rights of journalists.
agreed, I made a similar point about the stupidity of the CNN headline.
Trick question government can't make gun laws.
This isn't about logic it is about talking your opponent down when your supporters literally don't care what you say or do as long as you win.
"Amy Coney Barrett says she reads a newspaper, but could fairly judge a case on press rights"
Fucking morons.
Repeal the NFA, GCA, Hughes etc etc