"Then allow me to pose another question Judge Barrett. If you had a 53 year old man-child, career fucktard as a son who was banging strippers in the ass between blasts off either a crack or meth pipe, what would you say the binding factors are in Madison V. Marbury?"
As we've seen with the NY Post story, they don't have to address anything. They can just wait for their colleagues in Big Tech to memory-hole it. Trust me, most of the American people will never know this happened.
Hawley lays it all out, but as a "hypothetical case" that might come before SCOTUS.
Barrett says: "I can't answer hypotheticals".
I'm just glad he forced it out onto the floor and into the light.
Hawley:
"Then allow me to pose another question Judge Barrett. If you had a 53 year old man-child, career fucktard as a son who was banging strippers in the ass between blasts off either a crack or meth pipe, what would you say the binding factors are in Madison V. Marbury?"
Weren’t the strippers banging him in the ass?
We talking about Hunter or Barry?
He peed on them.
Only in Bang-Cock! :p
Hawley's great. I've been watching all day. Cruz is also good, but Hawley with the "hypothetical" blew us away.
Yeah, that’s the best part.
This forces the Misleadia to address it.
Even if they attack Hawley over it, a lot of people are gonna wonder what it’s all about.
As we've seen with the NY Post story, they don't have to address anything. They can just wait for their colleagues in Big Tech to memory-hole it. Trust me, most of the American people will never know this happened.
And he got it on record!
"Well I thought you might say that.. and I'm glad you won't because who knows, that case may come before you."
🤣🤣🤣
Gold.
I guarantee you Nadler shit his pants a little out of pure consternation during those 20 seconds.
She’d order an immediate emergency exorcism on everything that Joe Biden is associated with.