5908
Comments (267)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
BreakfastGun 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why can't she answer hypotheticals?

12
DisgustedByMisleadia [S] 12 points ago +12 / -0

This is established precedent. A nominee judge won't answer hypothetical questions about cases that might come before them.

It doesn't prevent Democrats from trying to bait them, though.

In this case, Hawley was simply getting the news out there on national TV.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
10
DisgustedByMisleadia [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

No, it's not ridiculous.

Judges are not supposed to pre-judge a case.

Of course, Democrats are allowed, but Republicans can't.

4
charbatch 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's actually a good rule considering the hypotheticals are not real cases, are not nuanced in any way, and are meant as gotcha questions 99% of the time.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
2
tcriv 2 points ago +3 / -1

she explains why she can't many times and the reasoning is sound.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4