5908
Comments (267)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
tcriv 2 points ago +3 / -1

she explains why she can't many times and the reasoning is sound.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
2
CantStumpTheTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I agree with you.

A judge should be able to take a hypothetical and say something like, "Well given those parameters and some basic law I know from the top of my head I would say X would be an appropriate response."

Like different people can have vastly different answers to the same question I don't tink its unreasonable tbh..

1
testingonetwothree 1 point ago +1 / -0

As a judge she is allowed to explain her methodology for a ruling but she can't give opinions that demonstrate political leanings or else she risks being deemed unfit for the job...

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1