They were not innocent. Their reprieve was political.
Spez: I think there was a June 10, 2019, opinion piece discussing a Netflix “documentary” that got it all wrong. The opinion piece lays out the verifiable facts.
He was relying on the media, mostly local NY, which we now know is hopelessly compromised and fake - but that was not as well realized back then. He would surely do his due diligence if it happened in these days.
Look up the WSJ June 2019 coverage of the CP5.
They were not innocent. Their reprieve was political.
Spez: I think there was a June 10, 2019, opinion piece discussing a Netflix “documentary” that got it all wrong. The opinion piece lays out the verifiable facts.
He had an opinion, doesn't make him racist because others don't agree with it.
He was relying on the media, mostly local NY, which we now know is hopelessly compromised and fake - but that was not as well realized back then. He would surely do his due diligence if it happened in these days.
"thats already been debunked"
their own fav line back at them
https://www.wsj.com/articles/netflixs-false-story-of-the-central-park-five-11560207823
good place to start
if you want to get deep with sources
http://interactive.nydailynews.com/project/central-park-five/original-investigation-and-prosecution/decisions-and-orders/NYCLD_001025_Justice%20Thomas%20Galligan's%20Decision%20on%20Defendants'%20Motions%20to%20Suppress%20(2-23-1990).PDF