The emails the NY Post put in their article is for a Gmail account, Gmail signs their emails, the raw email would have a DKIM signature. When WikiLeaks published podesta emails they published the raw files.
The NY Post must publish the raw email file otherwise it has the appearance that they are omitting the signatures on purpose, or they are fake. Without those signatures there is no way to prove the emails they are publishing are real.
Simply publish the raw files and we can all be certain.
Why omit the proof?
I guess they dont care cause no one else cares. but i get what you mean like wikileaks did it.. with the numbers right? ..
I fear it jsut goes over the heads. I'm confident they're real and libtards wont accept the email number as proof anyway.
Well if Biden doesn't deny they are real it will end up being defacto proof but cryptographic proof would be even better... And if they do deny it then it's in question without it.
Here is the technical details if desired https://wikileaks.org/DKIM-Verification.html