Noe claims here that a stinger missile sold via the CIA annex at Benghazi was >used to shoot down EXTORTION17.
https://de.catbox.moe/w5sch8.pdf
The investigation into that loss specifically excluded the possibility that MANPADS >(stingers) was used. The investigation concluded that an RPG-7 was used. If Noe >has evidence to the contrary, he should've lead this slow-drip bullshit with the >proof that this investigation is lying. If he doesn't have evidence to the contrary, >then he's a retard who doesn't have his basic facts straight.
Also notice that he fucks up his logic on that same time stamp. He's implying that >the SEALS who killed UBL were assassinated intentionally. But he even >acknowledges that not all of them are dead. So that's clearly not the case.
And lastly, his presentation centers on the fact that Clinton didn't approve a full >scale amphibious invasion and aerial bombardment of a country we're at peace >with. Why the fuck would she have?
These threads are shit. There's no happening because you fags keep making big >claims without evidence.
Sounds like coping to me. Using smooth brain logic to sway the smooth brains. Life is 100x more complicated than this poster makes it out to be. Shills use this tactic to simplify a situation for easier shilling.
Example:
If the CIA was involved in killing JFK we would have found out by now, no one can hide something so big!
It simplifies the situation "no one can hide something that big" and then uses this false simplification to prove their point via circular logic. The point that the CIA couldn't have killed JFK.
In reality once a person has children they can be leveraged to support and hide any crime no matter the size. Parents would do/hide literally anything to protect their offspring. Human beings are amazingly easy to manipulate and bend like a pretzel. Those who you can't twist you blow up with a stinger missile.
Story needs more cowbell
If it were real they would release the evidence.
I KNOW! My wife is obsessed with this story and has been on the warpath of why is this not going anywhere.
Youtubers "Next News Now" and "Anna Khait" has video interviews
I've seen comments here and there but where is this information coming from - is there an article somewhere?
Youtubers "Next News Now" and "Anna Khait" has video interviews
Needs solid evidence!
inb4 Q is fak.... . oh.
9 Megathreads over at 4chan... if you're into that sort of thing.
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/282622977
A agree with what /pol/ anon said below.
Sounds like coping to me. Using smooth brain logic to sway the smooth brains. Life is 100x more complicated than this poster makes it out to be. Shills use this tactic to simplify a situation for easier shilling.
Example:
It simplifies the situation "no one can hide something that big" and then uses this false simplification to prove their point via circular logic. The point that the CIA couldn't have killed JFK.
In reality once a person has children they can be leveraged to support and hide any crime no matter the size. Parents would do/hide literally anything to protect their offspring. Human beings are amazingly easy to manipulate and bend like a pretzel. Those who you can't twist you blow up with a stinger missile.
Love the photo. Fond memories of flying on the chinook. A life time ago.
Follow Nick Noe on twitter https://twitter.com/scienceismymuse
...because it probably isn't true?