This might explain some of the military brass coming out against Trump. If they were involved in this scheme and allowed their men to be murdered, then they are guilty of Treason.
The premise is wrong, it only reinforces "9/11 perpetrated by osama bin laden" -- that's how you know the premise is wrong. Everything else is probably correct
But instead, consider this. Bin Laden was CIA. Just like Solemani and Khasshogi...that's why the CIA erm, the US Media was so up and arms about them.
BIN LADEN WAS AL QUEDA. AL QUEDA WAS/IS CIA
Get it? They knew he didn't do it. He was the patsy. He probably let them, worked with them to engineer this whole thing as a "school play". He was a paid actor
9/11 New Yorker here: I'm not quick into conspiracy theories. Don't believe that 9/11 was an inside job. But never believed that Osama Bin Laden was behind the attacks either. Reason for my doubts is this: I clearly remember the days after 9/11. Osama Bin Laden denied any involvement. CNN, Fox News covered it. If you know one thing about terrorists then it is this: They LOVE to take credit for their actions. Sometimes they even claim responsibility when they have no involvement at all. Around 2-3 weeks after 9/11, the message in the news changed. CIA overheard phone calls during which Osama Bin Laden boasting about the successful attacks. Few weeks later he allegedly claimed full responsibility openly.
This never made sense to me. FBI, CIA and the Bush administration were all under enormous pressure to solve the crime of the century. I have no idea who planed and executed the attacks, but I doubt that it was OBL.
I don't know. Taking WTC 7 down on purpose doesn't even make sense when you believe in the wildest conspiracy. Why the hell would anybody do that? What purpose does a controlled demolition on the day of the attacks serve? They could easily have said: the structure is compromised we have to demolish it. That's exactly what they did with the Deutsche Bank building on the south-side of the WTC.
Idk why they decided to take down building 7. Maybe just for the extra insurance money. Maybe so they didn't have to take out the asbestos before they demolished it. Tell me how that building fell perfectly if it wasn't intentionally demolished then.
Yeah, i don't know. Asbestos was a big deal with the Deutsche Bank building. It took them 4 years to demolish it. Insurance paid for everything. WTC7 was also fully insured. I agree that the collapse looked orchestrated but I can't come up with a compelling reason for it.
This story reminds me of the the "UN taking over the US" just before the election in 2016 with pictures and videos of white personnel carriers on rail cars heading all over the US.
It's all done in stages, tested out little then grow it out big. The lockdown in Boston was in my opinion the precursor to these pandemic lockdowns. And them talking about the UN, and Obama passing the internet shut down in 2010. I really believe they're just going to shut the internet off. Everyone on traditional news will say he lost and that he won't resign. They're calling in the UN and blah blah blah civil war.
This might explain some of the military brass coming out against Trump. If they were involved in this scheme and allowed their men to be murdered, then they are guilty of Treason.
The premise is wrong, it only reinforces "9/11 perpetrated by osama bin laden" -- that's how you know the premise is wrong. Everything else is probably correct
But instead, consider this. Bin Laden was CIA. Just like Solemani and Khasshogi...that's why the CIA erm, the US Media was so up and arms about them.
BIN LADEN WAS AL QUEDA. AL QUEDA WAS/IS CIA
Get it? They knew he didn't do it. He was the patsy. He probably let them, worked with them to engineer this whole thing as a "school play". He was a paid actor
BIN LADEN was a PAID actor for the CIA
9/11 New Yorker here: I'm not quick into conspiracy theories. Don't believe that 9/11 was an inside job. But never believed that Osama Bin Laden was behind the attacks either. Reason for my doubts is this: I clearly remember the days after 9/11. Osama Bin Laden denied any involvement. CNN, Fox News covered it. If you know one thing about terrorists then it is this: They LOVE to take credit for their actions. Sometimes they even claim responsibility when they have no involvement at all. Around 2-3 weeks after 9/11, the message in the news changed. CIA overheard phone calls during which Osama Bin Laden boasting about the successful attacks. Few weeks later he allegedly claimed full responsibility openly.
This never made sense to me. FBI, CIA and the Bush administration were all under enormous pressure to solve the crime of the century. I have no idea who planed and executed the attacks, but I doubt that it was OBL.
So what do you think happened to building 7? The 3rd building that fell (perfectly, I might add) that day.
I don't know. Taking WTC 7 down on purpose doesn't even make sense when you believe in the wildest conspiracy. Why the hell would anybody do that? What purpose does a controlled demolition on the day of the attacks serve? They could easily have said: the structure is compromised we have to demolish it. That's exactly what they did with the Deutsche Bank building on the south-side of the WTC.
Look up the type of documents that were stored in building 7 and you'll see the reason.
Idk why they decided to take down building 7. Maybe just for the extra insurance money. Maybe so they didn't have to take out the asbestos before they demolished it. Tell me how that building fell perfectly if it wasn't intentionally demolished then.
Yeah, i don't know. Asbestos was a big deal with the Deutsche Bank building. It took them 4 years to demolish it. Insurance paid for everything. WTC7 was also fully insured. I agree that the collapse looked orchestrated but I can't come up with a compelling reason for it.
And how long did it take them to get the Deutsche Bank Building wired up?
4 years, if memory serves me.
This story reminds me of the the "UN taking over the US" just before the election in 2016 with pictures and videos of white personnel carriers on rail cars heading all over the US.
It's all done in stages, tested out little then grow it out big. The lockdown in Boston was in my opinion the precursor to these pandemic lockdowns. And them talking about the UN, and Obama passing the internet shut down in 2010. I really believe they're just going to shut the internet off. Everyone on traditional news will say he lost and that he won't resign. They're calling in the UN and blah blah blah civil war.
Anna Khait, a Russian actress who, according to this image, is now working with Falun Gong (Epoch Times) and met with the CCP-owned congress. Strange.
"Someone close to Trump" Of course. Are they "familiar with the thinking" as well?
"A high-ranking General" Nice and vague.
Ms. Khait "dopped" documents that were supposedly classified but somehow were also publicly available on the internet for a while now.
The only other "evidence" we have is the falcon wizard talking to a disgraced congressman about how the someone in the government did something wrong.
This whole thing stinks of a psy-op to try to cover for the Hunter Biden releases that I'm sure they knew were coming.
What about the connection to Benghazi and Clinton? Is that all part of this?
https://www.toptradeguru.com/news/cia-whistleblower-obama-biden-sent-iran-152-billion-as-a-coverup-for-the-deaths-of-seal-team-6/
cope. even if its. true. most likely not. the media will never cover it and it wont matter. social media will censor everyone.