3533
Comments (71)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
18
chuckachookah 18 points ago +18 / -0

But, really, are they?

What’s happened to them? Nothing.

Well there is a pretty clear Public Square, free speech argument that can be made, the more compelling argument is one of the anti-trust.

And who decides to pursue anti-trust?

7
Tulkas71 7 points ago +7 / -0

Unchecked hubris is a dangerous thing.

3
FragrantDude 3 points ago +3 / -0

And who decides to pursue anti-trust?

The people on the committees who, as of yesterday, have sent inquiry letters to both Facebook and Twitter. Time will tell if it's real or just election year blustering.

6
AnointedVisions 6 points ago +6 / -0

OH SHIT THEY SENT SOME LETTERS

OH SHIT

LETTERS WERE SENT

1
FragrantDude 1 point ago +2 / -1

Normally, I'd be on the sarcastic train right with you, but these aren't those typical "you did something wrong and we're mad" impotent letters. These are letters that initiate discovery leading into some sort of hearing. They're a bit different than the do-nothing letters we're used to, so I'm cautiously optimistic.

2
AnointedVisions 2 points ago +2 / -0

OH SHIT THESE LETTERS ARE A BIT DIFFERENT

OH FUCK

2
Magaimmigrant 2 points ago +2 / -0

Has any executive ever got in legal trouble after a senate hearing?

1
FragrantDude 1 point ago +1 / -0

At this point if I had to choose between them, I'd rather get relief in how the companies are run than see someone perp-walked. If they don't fix how the companies are run, the next person to come in will just do the same thing, and all we would have gotten is a temporary satisfaction watching one person go be prosecuted.

1
chuckachookah 1 point ago +1 / -0

Incorrect.

Antitrust is pursued by the Department of Justice.

Now, I'll ask again, how come nothing happens?

1
FragrantDude 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're right antitrust is litigated by DOJ, but I think antitrust is just one aspect that they're going after. I could be wrong, but that's my read of the situation and is why multiple groups are gearing into action. Here's hoping it's all not just election-time blustering that gets conveniently forgotten on Nov 4.

1
chuckachookah 1 point ago +1 / -0

My point was -- the DOJ is really the department of injustice.

The inactivity under Barr and his predecessors is handing over Orwellian type power to companies filled with completely imbalanced people, most of which don't believe in America and are happy to wipe their ass with the Constitution.

It's another failure of Barr. No other way to see it or say it.

1
hrc_for_prison 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep, I rarely talk to my lib wife about politics but I mentioned to her this morning that it was despicable that Facebook was blocking links to the NY Post, and she replied:

"Well, yeah, but I use Twitter, and they aren't blocking it."

30 minutes later, I sent her this image. I haven't heard back. Pray for me.

But you are right. Those who hate Trump are just going to continue to believe that FB and Twitter haven't done anything wrong. I can't imagine the cognitive dissonance these people have.

2
chuckachookah 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those who hate Trump are just going to continue to believe that FB and Twitter haven't done anything wrong. I can't imagine the cognitive dissonance these people have.

More red pills.