Except it wasn't hacking, you Twitter half-wits. What part of opening a legally obtained laptop, seeing the documents, and passing them on is hacking? Is it the same hacking that made that shitheel 2nd debate moderator publicly ask if he should respond to Trump? Or was it the kind of hacking Hillary did to her server "with a cloth?"
Not to mention it describes most every leftwing attack against Trump, although more accurately that would be "content obtained by somebody familiar with the president's thinking."
Except it wasn't hacking, you Twitter half-wits. What part of opening a legally obtained laptop, seeing the documents, and passing them on is hacking? Is it the same hacking that made that shitheel 2nd debate moderator publicly ask if he should respond to Trump? Or was it the kind of hacking Hillary did to her server "with a cloth?"
Oh my bad! I totally forgot the Trump authorized them to release his private tax information......
No, no, no. They mean we aren't allowed to post content obtained without their (Twitter's) authorization, silly.
Not to mention it describes most every leftwing attack against Trump, although more accurately that would be "content obtained by somebody familiar with the president's thinking."
Not a courtesy they extend to Republicans and everyone knows it.
In this case the content was obtained by its lawful owner.