We all know that, the article actually flat out lies about it. It's purely damage control to hide how corrupt Biden is. They have nothing but lies.
They are trying to install Biden to save their corrupt system and save the guilty from justice.
They hope the population will go back to sleep, for decades they got away with their lies and theft of regular people's wealth and lives, they want their good old days back.
But you have to understand, it wasn't because the prosecutor was investigating Joe's son. That was just a coincidence. Joe wanted him fired because the prosecutor was corrupt. Mind you, they don't present evidence that he was corrupt, but we can trust that Joe had the best intentions in mind when he threatened to withhold a billion dollars in aid unless Ukraine fired the "corrupt" prosecutor who just so happened to be investigating those connected to the big energy firm that hired Joe's crackhead son (with no experience in the energy field), while Joe was VP.
Now, Trump telling the president of Ukraine he ought to look into that, now that's the stuff of impeachment!
The evidence that the prosecutor was corrupt was that the Biden family was engaged in corruption. Just as the evidence against Trump was the actions of Biden and before him Hillary. Everything is projection, which is defense of the indefensible.
The nuance in their statement isn’t that he didn’t get the guy fired. That’s the what.
The why that they deny is due to him investigating Burisma, who employed Huntard.
They almost never give any reason for why they strong armed his firing. Once I heard them say he was a bad hombre and multiple European allies wanted him out.
Well lots of European countries do shady business deals all over the world, and ousting a foreign nation’s attorney general is running interference without a non-corrupt option.
But he did, he says it on tape. Bragged about it in fact.
Right, so the most they can legally get away with is "reporting" false information and then circle-jerking it to all corners of their echo chamber.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd0p96miSK8
We all know that, the article actually flat out lies about it. It's purely damage control to hide how corrupt Biden is. They have nothing but lies.
They are trying to install Biden to save their corrupt system and save the guilty from justice.
They hope the population will go back to sleep, for decades they got away with their lies and theft of regular people's wealth and lives, they want their good old days back.
The Reckoning is coming...one way or the other...somehow...we'll come out on the other side of this mess stronger and more intelligent.
But you have to understand, it wasn't because the prosecutor was investigating Joe's son. That was just a coincidence. Joe wanted him fired because the prosecutor was corrupt. Mind you, they don't present evidence that he was corrupt, but we can trust that Joe had the best intentions in mind when he threatened to withhold a billion dollars in aid unless Ukraine fired the "corrupt" prosecutor who just so happened to be investigating those connected to the big energy firm that hired Joe's crackhead son (with no experience in the energy field), while Joe was VP.
Now, Trump telling the president of Ukraine he ought to look into that, now that's the stuff of impeachment!
Literally their only evidence has been "other globalist commies said he was corrupt too".
The evidence that the prosecutor was corrupt was that the Biden family was engaged in corruption. Just as the evidence against Trump was the actions of Biden and before him Hillary. Everything is projection, which is defense of the indefensible.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXA--dj2-CY
Here it is
The nuance in their statement isn’t that he didn’t get the guy fired. That’s the what.
The why that they deny is due to him investigating Burisma, who employed Huntard.
They almost never give any reason for why they strong armed his firing. Once I heard them say he was a bad hombre and multiple European allies wanted him out.
Well lots of European countries do shady business deals all over the world, and ousting a foreign nation’s attorney general is running interference without a non-corrupt option.