I've had the same conversation several times with conservative women. I point out that no, you yourself are not nuts, but most women are fucking crazy (they strongly agree) and that as a conservative woman paradoxically taking away their right to vote would result in their preferred policy winning across the board. Nobody has yet to come up with a decent argument against this.
Women biologically just tend to put their emotions before rational thought. It's what helps them do their natural role of being nurturing, caring, and keeping social ties together a lot better than men (as much as feminism tries to push these things aside). However, this rolls over into our government, where women will often vote on emotion or for leftists social issues rather than for things that truly matter in the grand scheme of our world and country. At least in many instances, if a woman's husband is more informed politically, she'll vote with him or take up his positions. However, single women is a completely different story.
I'm a female Trump voter. Suburban mom, former soccer mom, former corporate executive and current small business owner. I've been politically tuned in since I was in grade school watching Watergate hearings in the living room with my Mom. I went to a women's college - steeped in women's studies and followed the Iran-Contra hearings while Walter Mondale & Geraldine Ferraro came to our campus and convinced all of us that voting Democrat was our future. Which is what I did until the last term of President Clinton where I was fed up with the absolute abuse of his office and the circus around his investigation.
I absolutely agree about the emotional side of why women vote the way we do. But men also vote with emotion too - they are just emotional and pumped up about different things. With conservative men, it centers around how invasive is government on his own domain - i.e. gun rights, taxes, infringement on religious beliefs, or conforming to laws that may inhibit his personal freedoms or job prospects. With conservative women, it centers around education for children, maintaining a secure environment for family. If Trump can convince the 'squishes' that he has these in his sights he can win over more suburban moms. Trust me, suburban moms are some of the best influencers in our political landscape today!
it centers around education for children, maintaining a secure environment for family.
that's where a major issue comes into play with that large voting block of women who are unmarried and have no children. Of course, if I had my way, the voting age would be 25 and that wouldn't be as big of an issue.
Truth. Single motherhood is a bane on the rest of American culture. Obviously many times it can't be avoided - but lessening the likelihood helps everyone.
"unmarried and have no children" are dying out since the 90s. These people never reproduced and were told in collage that they should not have any kids because that will kill the planet or something like that. Now colleges see 10% drop in attendance because they the people who suppose provide the next generation of students are not having any kids. Conservatives already out number liberals and it will get a lot worse over the next 10 to 15 years. Why do you think they are all going crazy. They thought that they will take over the world just to find out that they actually are disappearing.
You forget that every brainwashed liberal that comes out of college remains married and without children for at least 5-10 years. They're a decent sized voting block (if they actually go out to vote).
Came here to say this, women voters, muh feelz is literally the only thing that they understand. Even R women can be manipulated with this. mass shootings, terrorism, rapists, these things keep them up at night and anyone claiming to go hard on non-existent threats makes them feel cushy.
He got a pretty loud standing ovation. It seemed the people there might have been labeled as "voting for Biden", but it's obvious that a lot, if not all, are leaning Trump now.
The confrontational bitch of a host helped too. Showed first hand the disrespect towards a President, while people there showed there respect even if they disagreed with him.
I think that's the way this is going. People see Trump as a commanding leader, see he can take and even dish back the abuse at him. Strong candidates poll extremely well even with opposite parties
He's bene talking about that for years. I say he's just using the fence riding as leverage. If he wanted DACA he would've passed it already when he offered it to the Dems. We're good.
it was good. I was hoping he didn't say "THROW THEM THE HELL OUTTA HERE" because it would rub people the wrong way. Even though that's what he should do.
Hardly a debate. All she did was ask him a question, wait until he was about to make his point and then ask him a different question that may or may not have been related.
I can see that. He was attacked non-stop by Savannah but he was Mr. Cool Ice out there. Didn't lash out at her like he would at Biden. He saw that they loaded the audience with women and knew what their game plan was. DRCOWBOYVSGGEOTUS wins yet again.
Here's the thing I don't get. Why wouldn't NBC want 4 more years of Trump? Regardless of your policy position that town hall was miles more entertaining and interesting than the biden nap hour. If Trump wins NBC can continue to rant and rave which their viewers will likely watch much more than Biden bootlicking. These idiots NEED him whether they want to admit it or not. Once he's gone after 2028 they're going to totally tank.
The ACB conformation hearings are really bringing in the suburban moms. She’s a very compelling person, esp to suburban moms that relate to her. The demoncrats can’t help themselves, they will continue to abuse her and this is wonderful for Trump re-election, but terrible to treat ACB so poorly! What a disgrace!
I've had the same conversation several times with conservative women. I point out that no, you yourself are not nuts, but most women are fucking crazy (they strongly agree) and that as a conservative woman paradoxically taking away their right to vote would result in their preferred policy winning across the board. Nobody has yet to come up with a decent argument against this.
That's why we need to go back to property owners, and 1 vote per household.
Women biologically just tend to put their emotions before rational thought. It's what helps them do their natural role of being nurturing, caring, and keeping social ties together a lot better than men (as much as feminism tries to push these things aside). However, this rolls over into our government, where women will often vote on emotion or for leftists social issues rather than for things that truly matter in the grand scheme of our world and country. At least in many instances, if a woman's husband is more informed politically, she'll vote with him or take up his positions. However, single women is a completely different story.
I'm a female Trump voter. Suburban mom, former soccer mom, former corporate executive and current small business owner. I've been politically tuned in since I was in grade school watching Watergate hearings in the living room with my Mom. I went to a women's college - steeped in women's studies and followed the Iran-Contra hearings while Walter Mondale & Geraldine Ferraro came to our campus and convinced all of us that voting Democrat was our future. Which is what I did until the last term of President Clinton where I was fed up with the absolute abuse of his office and the circus around his investigation.
I absolutely agree about the emotional side of why women vote the way we do. But men also vote with emotion too - they are just emotional and pumped up about different things. With conservative men, it centers around how invasive is government on his own domain - i.e. gun rights, taxes, infringement on religious beliefs, or conforming to laws that may inhibit his personal freedoms or job prospects. With conservative women, it centers around education for children, maintaining a secure environment for family. If Trump can convince the 'squishes' that he has these in his sights he can win over more suburban moms. Trust me, suburban moms are some of the best influencers in our political landscape today!
that's where a major issue comes into play with that large voting block of women who are unmarried and have no children. Of course, if I had my way, the voting age would be 25 and that wouldn't be as big of an issue.
Truth. Single motherhood is a bane on the rest of American culture. Obviously many times it can't be avoided - but lessening the likelihood helps everyone.
"unmarried and have no children" are dying out since the 90s. These people never reproduced and were told in collage that they should not have any kids because that will kill the planet or something like that. Now colleges see 10% drop in attendance because they the people who suppose provide the next generation of students are not having any kids. Conservatives already out number liberals and it will get a lot worse over the next 10 to 15 years. Why do you think they are all going crazy. They thought that they will take over the world just to find out that they actually are disappearing.
You forget that every brainwashed liberal that comes out of college remains married and without children for at least 5-10 years. They're a decent sized voting block (if they actually go out to vote).
Thank you for your insight.
You aren't wrong.
The emasculating of men and the hyper emotionalizing of women voters is intentional.
Hate and fear reduce your ability to think.
They know that.
Came here to say this, women voters, muh feelz is literally the only thing that they understand. Even R women can be manipulated with this. mass shootings, terrorism, rapists, these things keep them up at night and anyone claiming to go hard on non-existent threats makes them feel cushy.
Yeaaaah. I love voting, I love the absurdity of political theater, but... Let's just leave it that I wouldn't be a suffragette.
He did great last night. Much better than his debate performance imo.
Two different audiences, IMO. But in both debates he kept the message focused and clear. Definitely something he is good at doing.
Yup, I think most of the live crowd were plants. It's the people watching at home that matter more.
Of course, the left is already saying she was paid and throwing out all sorts of theories.
I'm sure NBC specifically put her back there thinking she wasnt a Trump supporter. Their racism is showing.
No question. They really are that cynical
And obviously the nodding woman wasn't a plant either. You have to pepper the fake in with the genuine to sell it.
I think bandana lady whether a plant or not just got starstruck and couldn't help herself.
He got a pretty loud standing ovation. It seemed the people there might have been labeled as "voting for Biden", but it's obvious that a lot, if not all, are leaning Trump now.
The confrontational bitch of a host helped too. Showed first hand the disrespect towards a President, while people there showed there respect even if they disagreed with him.
I think that's the way this is going. People see Trump as a commanding leader, see he can take and even dish back the abuse at him. Strong candidates poll extremely well even with opposite parties
Alpha Chad.
Get this.... https://share.par.pw/post/f9eeadfa17814f668fd9bbd226ce48ec
IN NBC TOWNHALL:
In commercial break, the crowd CHEERS and CHANTS for Trump!
People shout “Catholics for Trump - we love you!”
WE ARE WINNING‼️
Who's clutching pearls and over what, exactly?
My guess would be over his response on dreamers and DACA.
He's bene talking about that for years. I say he's just using the fence riding as leverage. If he wanted DACA he would've passed it already when he offered it to the Dems. We're good.
He basically told congress to figure that one out.
it was good. I was hoping he didn't say "THROW THEM THE HELL OUTTA HERE" because it would rub people the wrong way. Even though that's what he should do.
That quote reads like an argument for repealing the 19th amendment.
Hardly a debate. All she did was ask him a question, wait until he was about to make his point and then ask him a different question that may or may not have been related.
I can see that. He was attacked non-stop by Savannah but he was Mr. Cool Ice out there. Didn't lash out at her like he would at Biden. He saw that they loaded the audience with women and knew what their game plan was. DRCOWBOYVSGGEOTUS wins yet again.
If the lefties thought they were going to get Trump by having lots of women in the townhall, they thought wrong. Trump is great with women!
Here's the thing I don't get. Why wouldn't NBC want 4 more years of Trump? Regardless of your policy position that town hall was miles more entertaining and interesting than the biden nap hour. If Trump wins NBC can continue to rant and rave which their viewers will likely watch much more than Biden bootlicking. These idiots NEED him whether they want to admit it or not. Once he's gone after 2028 they're going to totally tank.
The ACB conformation hearings are really bringing in the suburban moms. She’s a very compelling person, esp to suburban moms that relate to her. The demoncrats can’t help themselves, they will continue to abuse her and this is wonderful for Trump re-election, but terrible to treat ACB so poorly! What a disgrace!