4134
Comments (359)
sorted by:
484
M4ster_Yoda 484 points ago +484 / -0

I read this here earlier: It's about not giving the Fake News the opportunity to deny it all at once.

291
AlphaNathan 291 points ago +291 / -0

Actually brilliant.

301
CisSiberianOrchestra 301 points ago +302 / -1

Andrew Brietbart was a big fan of the "slow drip" method of breaking a big story. It's the same technique Matt Drudge used to break the Monica Lewinsky story. He'd release a little information one day, the media would claim it was fake, then he'd release a little more information the next day proving that the media was lying. After a few days the media could no longer deny that the story was real and had to start covering it.

103
deleted 103 points ago +104 / -1
113
grndmrshlgando 113 points ago +113 / -0

same thing that happened to every media source with a few exceptions: taken over by communist-globalists. (we really need an identifiable faction for these people, when are they going to reveal themselves I wonder? my money is on AMSOC)

58
KAG_FTW 58 points ago +58 / -0

Ban pay-per-click method of advertising and you'll solve the problem

58
Cdope45 58 points ago +58 / -0

This 100%.

I have a journalism degree and I saw how ESPN, print media and cabal news operates in college. They're all entertainment channels now doing anything they can for ad revenue and clicks.

23
jomten 23 points ago +23 / -0

Honestly im torn on this. Advertisers subsidize free content for us all, without using taxes. Free market capitalism at work.

But liberals use fake outrage to scare advertisers away from conservatives, using the hecklers veto essentially.

11
ohiopede 11 points ago +11 / -0

Cabal news. Great term. I like it.

8
DarkMAGA 8 points ago +8 / -0

And I have journalism classes under my belt too, and completely agree. You learn to be unbiased, to seek the truth, to have verified sources. Hell, there's even media ethics classes and even a website with these rules.

And everything I've seen the media do since Trump goes against the journalistic integrity you are taught.

Like you said, it's now entertainment and clicks. Truth is less important It's all about narrative and maintaining your bias audience. It works on both sides of the isle, it's just way worse on the left.

2
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 2 points ago +2 / -0

The real problem is people clicking it.

But shit like CNN and the NYT aren't for-profit companies. They are expenses for propaganda.

34
MichellesMingy 34 points ago +34 / -0

Get rid of HR4310 that Obama signed in 2012 allowing the media to push propaganda without reprocussion.

10
FergieJR 10 points ago +10 / -0

That would be a huge start

20
Pirate_Lafitte 20 points ago +20 / -0

The people who really control those news outlets are billionaires who don't give a fuck about clickbait ad revenue. They care about disseminating their proaganda

11
Wallypip3 11 points ago +12 / -1

Finally someone gets it.

It's the same reasoning that they won't disseminate real news.

"HurR dUrR, the MeDiA wONt CoVeR"

Don't fucking expect them to, they are enemies of America.

4
spicy_deluxe 4 points ago +4 / -0

This. Billionaires buy up news agencies like they buy up mega-yachts. They enhance their family prestige, they don't expect them to make money.

1
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you. These companies aren't making enough money to support themselves. They are being paid for by subversives. It's on the expense side of the ledger.

8
bigntazt 8 points ago +8 / -0

I dont remember the name but, I have this extension that not only blocks ads, it will click on all ads on a page to artificially inflate the click rate so that advertisers will throw away payments to the site because its BS click data.

6
FergieJR 6 points ago +6 / -0

I do that manually when I get a democrat ad on YouTube.

I figure each click I make is one less going out to someone else hah

8
1777 8 points ago +8 / -0

Tax the data they receive.

1
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait you don't know who they are?

66
CisSiberianOrchestra 66 points ago +67 / -1

Matt Drudge quietly sold off Drudge Report last year. The person who bought it is the technical director of Google Cloud. So despite the name Drudge Report, Matt Drudge is no longer in charge of it.

39
Southern_Belle 39 points ago +39 / -0

Google?

So they're evil.

And support child sex trafficking.

Got it.

(Google's Eric Schmidt was Hillary's de facto tech lead. When GEOTUS signed the EO against human trafficking, Schmidt stepped down within 24 hours.)

10
MakeAmericaLegendary 10 points ago +10 / -0

Really? What do you think that he was doing that would cause him to step down?

2
Dsnazzy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm sure it has nothing to do with the time he spent in North Korea....surely.

4
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
FireannDireach 4 points ago +4 / -0

Whoever owns it is doing a piss poor job of running it. Go look at it right now. They're just publishing complete, fairly tale level bullshit. It's complete cognitive dissonance over there.

3
Isolated_Patriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Drudge report was already going corrupt before Trump was even inaugurated. If anything, that quiet selloff was the second one.

15
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 15 points ago +15 / -0

Drudge did an interview a few years ago and he said he expected to be regulated out of existence. Shortly after he sold. I don't know him personally or anything, but I've seen reports that drudge no longer has anything to do with drudge report and hasn't for some time. Check out bongino report. It's great.

13
subnu 13 points ago +13 / -0

Rantingly.com is the real spiritual successor. Bongino is great but it's really something different.

5
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 5 points ago +5 / -0

Awesome, I have heard of it but never been. I'll check it out

1
adameverton 1 point ago +1 / -0

I also like bonginoreport.com, trends.gab.com, and generaldispatch.whatfinger.com.

2
Isolated_Patriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

thelibertydaily

I check both every day, but if I had to pick one, https://thelibertydaily.com seems to catch a bit more info.

0
Dsnazzy 0 points ago +1 / -1

Rantingly is great

11
churnbutterhere 11 points ago +11 / -0

Sold out.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
17
SOXXX 17 points ago +17 / -0

That's what happened with wikileaks in 2016 to.

44
CisSiberianOrchestra 44 points ago +44 / -0

It was also how James O'Keefe and Andrew Brietbart brought down ACORN. Every day they would release a new undercover video, and every day the media's claims that it was an isolated incident became less credible. It ultimately resulted in a bipartisan vote by Congress to defund ACORN.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
2
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 2 points ago +2 / -0

But muh edited tapes!

The MSM literally said it was discredited because it was edited. They said it was edited because it wasn't the entire, full taped video from start to finish. So basically everything you ever see on TV, EVER is discredited unless it's the entire uncut raw footage.

16
AllTheWayTrump 16 points ago +16 / -0

Slow drip is fine, but the drip should have started before people started voting.

24
DeportAntifa 24 points ago +24 / -0

No. I understand what you're saying but MAYBE 10% of people have voted so far so the harm is far from done. 1-5% will swing this thing. And the main point:

Once people start voting it is too late to get Biden's name off the ballots. If Giuliani would have broken this last month, the Dems would have gone OH FUCK and pulled Biden, and all this ammo would be worth nothing.

Once people start voting, the candidate is locked in, their prey is captive and they can ram spear after spear into the exposed belly of the caged beast.

I made a post about this but truly 7D chess for them to sit on this evidence even through Trump's impeachment, waiting for this exact moment.

10
N7fury 10 points ago +10 / -0

Thank you for making me feel better about this

3
DeportAntifa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cheers, pede. Trust in GEOTUS

3
tpark 3 points ago +3 / -0

One thing that bothers me is that many of the people who would be inclined to vote Democrat are unable to understand why the corrupt behavior of Joe Biden is a problem. The Ukraine corruption business is a good start, especially since it has been denied by Joe Biden, and there's specific information showing that Joe Biden had pressured the Ukraine government to fire Viktor Shokin by threatening to withhold 1B of aid. The long term corruption of the Biden family is the real story, but the Hunter Humps Whores angle is tabloid worthy and brings in the views.

1
DeportAntifa 1 point ago +1 / -0

Totally agree. Good analysis.

1
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not trying to be a Debbie Downer here but I really doubt they're gonna remove Biden as candidate. It's okay. Biden/Harris, it's all the same.

2
FuckRioters 2 points ago +2 / -0

I suspect this has been planned for quite some time, given Rudy's had this information since late 2019. I suspect the plan all along was to drop this right before the 2nd debate, and it's probably much more reliable and easier to just stick with the plan, even if it's not perfectly optimal.

I expect the information being released is being done so in a very specific order, with specific news outlets, and with specific dates in order to create the correct effect and potentially bait people into responding in certain ways at certain times.

10
tdmort 10 points ago +10 / -0

Righteous Indignation...wonderful and amazing read.

4
CisSiberianOrchestra 4 points ago +4 / -0

I recommend the book to everyone here, but particularly the chapter where he talks about the Frankfurt School and the origins of Cultural Marxism is the United States.

5
energia 5 points ago +5 / -0

Same thing with Wikileaks and Snowden.

29
stonetears4fears 29 points ago +29 / -0

Yeah because they can come up with answers to each drop but those answers might be automatically contradicted with each subsequent drop. There’s no way to spin the story that way.

11
MLGS 11 points ago +11 / -0

Rudy is one of the smartest guys on the red team, I wouldn't be surprised at all if Wray gets sacked on November 4th and Trump puts Rudy in charge of purging the FBI.

6
Mooksayshigh 6 points ago +6 / -0

Just like Project Veritas. Let them comment on the video, saying it’s fake or some stupid shit, then BAM part 2, blowing their statement out of the water with more proof.

2
pepperconchobhar 2 points ago +3 / -1

This is what Project Veritas does. He learned it from Brightbart. (sp?)

48
DemsFuckKids 48 points ago +48 / -0

i don't even need to watch it after this comment. death by 1000 cuts game over trump2020 trumpjr2024 trumpjr2028 barron2032

21
PatriotHiwi 21 points ago +22 / -1

Trump jr. Doesn't get a second term? WRONG.

18
deleted 18 points ago +19 / -1
13
Pepe_in_the_USA 13 points ago +13 / -0

He got the spirit

7
ProphetOfKek 7 points ago +7 / -0

Maybe he’ll pull a Grover Cleveland.

6
PatriotHiwi 6 points ago +6 / -0

If Kek wills it.

5
glow-operator-2-0 5 points ago +5 / -0

I kinda get it, but how many terms did that fat ass do in total? 3?

2
befehlistbefehl 2 points ago +2 / -0

Grover Cleveland did two non-consecutive terms.

1
glow-operator-2-0 1 point ago +1 / -0

But still two terms. I want Mr Trump to do more.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
5
dahdahdah_dahditdah 5 points ago +5 / -0

So Trump JR gets two terms going at once?

i don't even need to watch it after this comment. death by 1000 cuts game over trump2020 trumpjr2024 trumpjr2024 barron2028

9
DemsFuckKids 9 points ago +9 / -0

fixed. ha i can't read or math

5
dahdahdah_dahditdah 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thanks for fixing it, pede. :)

3
PatrickSebast 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pretty sure Barron is going to need to wait a bit more than 8 years.

2
DemsFuckKids 2 points ago +2 / -0

whatever, queer. u know what i mean. go back to reddit

1
cuckslasher 1 point ago +1 / -0

trump junior is pushing commie/NRDC lies about the pebble project

i want him nowhere near the presidency

8
BadManOrange 8 points ago +10 / -2

I'll take Pence over Trump Jr. Trump Jr.'s a great hype man for POTUS, but I don't think he comes anywhere close to his dad.

8
Pepe_in_the_USA 8 points ago +8 / -0

Agreed - Trump works because he's original and his own person.

3
ParadigmShift2070 3 points ago +3 / -0

He should run as a governor first

3
MAGAPlenty 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump Jr. maybe as chief of staff

5
montanapede 5 points ago +6 / -1

Pence in 2024

10
DemsFuckKids 10 points ago +10 / -0

i love pence as a VP, but i'm convinced no other politician-type people should be presidents. trump's "no more bullshit" attitude has spoiled me. all i hear when i hear other politicians speak is grandstanding BS, except maybe FL gov. Desantos. we need more business-minded men and women that knows how to MAGA. no more bullshit

6
DeportAntifa 6 points ago +8 / -2

Pence is doing fine as a VP, he is not President material as far as I can see. You need massive charisma for that. And is the stable, un-blackmailable "straight man" to our big personality President. No disrespect whatsoever to our great VP, he has done a great job as-is, but his current role has been the best fit for him.

Crenshaw / Carlson '24? Owens / Grenell?

7
DemsFuckKids 7 points ago +8 / -1

fuck crenshaw and his red-flag-law votin' for ass!

-9
DeportAntifa -9 points ago +1 / -10

Sorry that you live in an imaginary world where bipolar people and schizophrenics either a.) don't exist, or b.) should possess firearms. Fuck all that.

Crenshaw is a robust 2A supporter and has a well-considered viewpoint on RF laws.

9
Shit_tyrone 9 points ago +9 / -0

No one thinks crazy people should have guns. The problem with red flag laws is that they're too broad. Anyone can report anyone red flag and most law enforcement agencies are too scared of "liability" or "what ifs" and err on what they think is the "side of caution" when it's really removing someone's 2nd amendment rights. I don't agree with red flag laws as they are right now.

8
DemsFuckKids 8 points ago +8 / -0

"shall not be infringed upon". i thought we were all patriots here. go back to reddit fag

1
montanapede 1 point ago +1 / -0

We also need to get rid of attorneys on the Supreme Court. But alas...

1
MichellesMingy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let's see a POTUS Eric first, then Jr.

2
DemsFuckKids 2 points ago +2 / -0

McEnany over Ivanka IMHO

0
heyhay83 0 points ago +2 / -2

I'm pretty sure Ivanka has to before Barron. I don't think he will be old enough.

7
DemsFuckKids 7 points ago +8 / -1

ivanka's too soft to be president

2
heyhay83 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't know about that she is pretty smart GEOTUS trust her with a lot. Also it would be funny watching liberals heads explode if she became the first woman president.

4
DemsFuckKids 4 points ago +4 / -0

McEnany over Ivanka IMHO

3
heyhay83 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'd go for that. As long as the first woman president is based i don't care!

1
Bobb 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ivanka is the velvet glove. She’s her dad’s successor imo. She’s always given the best roles.

2
ParadigmShift2070 2 points ago +3 / -1

No javanka

0
Faintlight 0 points ago +1 / -1

She's a lib. And married to ...

34
deleted 34 points ago +34 / -0
13
Matthewstanmitchell 13 points ago +13 / -0

Imagine being a former VP and the current Democratic challenger to Trump and having to ask the crack head son how much data he had on the laptop and what of during October.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
2
Matthewstanmitchell 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m going to say he was high off his ass. I’d assume a political family would either have someone they trust to work on their electronic devices or they simply dispose of them and get another one. I’m figuring this guy accessed Hunters cloud for his Apple devices or something. 25k pictures is a pretty amazing amount.

2
FuckRioters 2 points ago +2 / -0

What I believe this means is that Joe et al knows that there is more to the story and are bracing for it coming out.

Joe was deeply involved is this corruption, I'd even say he was the point-man in all of it, and Hunter was just the warm-body with a bank account for others to dump money into. We might not have public undeniable public proof of that, but all signs point that way.

If Joe knows all the signs point back at him, he can't really confirm or deny anything without either implicating himself, or lying putting his credibility on the line.

I'm betting they'll try real hard to come up with an excuse for making the 3rd debate not happen.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
FuckRioters 2 points ago +2 / -0

Since all of the moderators so far have been highly biased and corrupt, and the 3rd already appears biased as well, I'm sure they'll be under explicit instruction to not allow the Hunter Biden stuff to come up.

28
Agent_Orange 28 points ago +28 / -0

This is what I came here to say. If he pushed all out the first day, the censors would have shut it down (like they did with the first part). This way, it's a tidal wave that will increase in power with time.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
24
PyroSphere 24 points ago +24 / -0

Protracted death is the best kind of death when it comes to the evil bastards that are trying to destroy America.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
21
PyroSphere 21 points ago +21 / -0

For starters, you have to have just the right angle of attack. You know, if you are going for first degree.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Wesmacker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Minutes and seconds count!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
cob05 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which direction? /s

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
161
uvontheterrible 161 points ago +161 / -0

Rudy wanted to wait until the nation's attention was focused on this story before he releases the really bad stuff.

Thanks to FB and Twitter trying to censor it, the nation's attention is now focused on this story.

38
Thepedez 38 points ago +41 / -3

Except 3-4 days ago is ancient times. Hunter with a crack pipe is old news. When’s the next drip?

37
Thewickersnipper 37 points ago +37 / -0

That’s why they are dragging it out. News cycles are warp speed these days. If the Democrats were smart enough to know this they would have staged their George Floyd outrage right about now.

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
6
Thepedez 6 points ago +6 / -0

Okay...the election is in 18 days. When’s the next drop?

7
FlaviusOdo 7 points ago +7 / -0

There was one this am. Rudy said stuff will come out daily.

6
JonyJony 6 points ago +6 / -0

I want spirit cooking stuff. That shit turned a lot of people away from dems in 2016.

14
Hunterscrackbaby 14 points ago +14 / -0

NYP just had some more texts and emails and pics All family stuff.

Hunter is the bag holder, Joe gets his cut off the top of everything. Whole family is corrupt as shit.

Usual likely strategy is to drop a bomb 15-1800EST to dominate the news cycle for the weekend.

2
Thepedez 2 points ago +2 / -0

So another drop just happened? Where?

11
Kaizen 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yeap. If there are thousands of images surely you can slow drop a dozen or more a day every day until the election until the media buckles and can no longer pretend it's fake.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
2
2
Thepedez 2 points ago +2 / -0

As Breitbart notes, these emails are completely unconnected to the Hunter Biden emails released by the New York Post.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
91
MagasaurusRex 91 points ago +91 / -0

Once he releases they claim it as a fake and move on as usual. Now with a trickle they have to debunk it everyday since new stuff is always coming out. Turns the heat up!

44
MAGAMoose 44 points ago +44 / -0

Plus they know the true extent of how badly they screwed the American people but they don't know how much Rudy knows.

This way they can't start denying everything without risking tipping their hand and revealing more then they have to.

23
publ1us 23 points ago +23 / -0

Bingo. It's information warfare and Rudy and GEOTUS have the highest of the high ground at the moment.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
11
Thingthing22 11 points ago +11 / -0

They're also playing multi-dimensional chess with everything else that's happening. The DOJ said this can never happen again. And the FBI promised it wouldn't and they had made changes. The lied. And people died.

10
hit_backspace 10 points ago +10 / -0

As if an actual lawyer wouldn't bother with verifying the authenticity of all of the photos, emails before releasing it.

Rudy needs to watch his back.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
3
KAG_FTW 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wikileaks slow dripped the DNC and Podesta's emails

1
magaspif 1 point ago +2 / -1

That has also been debunked.

78
CanadianMeathead 78 points ago +79 / -1

They are claiming Rudy is compromised by Russia and this is all Russian disinformation.

Their playbook seems broken.

30
deleted 30 points ago +30 / -0
10
hit_backspace 10 points ago +10 / -0

In 4 years of Trump the left has revised muh Russia so many times, it's a joke. First it was muh Russia election interference while ignoring domestic interference, then it was muh Russia compromised trump campaign, muh Russia bounties, muh Russia hacks...

It seems like the left really thinks Russia is that powerful of a boogeyman.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
MsQleo 6 points ago +8 / -2

but it works with the normies. they have stopped caring.

8
magaspif 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yep "well good thing that Hunter isn't running for office" - mfer, he was working FOR his dad to get shady deals.

2
BaldEagles 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think they made it to the last page in the book, and just went back to the beginning. They have been out of ideas for quite some time.

49
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 49 points ago +49 / -0

"WHY WON'T HE RELEASE IT IN FULL?"

It's the Andrew Breitbart method.

The slow drip, drip, drip, of small details of a MASSIVE story. Each time a new detail is released, the media is forced to address the individual evidence, and they are always quick to lie and distort to cover it up. Then the next piece of evidence drops, and they must back-pedal and revise their narrative.

Over and over and over and over and over again... until finally, at the most opportune moment, you DROP THE HAMMER.

By doing it this way, you dismantle the credibility of the various MSM outlets on the story, and allow for long drown-out speculation and scrutiny that encourages critical thinking. (If you drop the whole thing at once, the media simply issues a one-time spin, and forever memory-holes it from the public discourse.)

22
nmipede 22 points ago +22 / -0

Exactly FTA:

He said the reason he is releasing it slowly is to catch Biden in “lies” as his campaign denies the allegations.

Bunch of us here, including yours truly. called it right off the bat. Democrats lie and cover up. No better way to show the American public how it works than to hold all the cards and play them as appropriate. They are so fucked.

1
Bobb 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not sure why anyone still believes in MSM but sad is there are.

40
THE_GEOTUS 40 points ago +41 / -1

DAMN THATS A FAST STICKY

35
doug2 35 points ago +35 / -0

For the daily caller they are incredibly hostile towards this and Rudy. Same with fox (minus tucker). It's disgusting.

1
salvecitizen 1 point ago +1 / -0

The editors should tell that pup reporter that he's lucky to be in the same building as Rudy Giuliani.

0
MushBrains2020 0 points ago +7 / -7

I'm getting tired of waiting for him to verify the emails. It would take someone 30 seconds to check the DKIM signature.

If he won't even do something that simple then he's either a moron or full of shit.

15
doug2 15 points ago +16 / -1

Huh? They're verified. What are you smoking. I just heard the inside story on this. They're verified. The FBI. Mike Lee, and Ron Johnson all had this and didn't want it.

1
MushBrains2020 1 point ago +7 / -6

Nothing is verified until he proves the DKIM signatures are legit. He could just do it for 2-3 emails, it would literally take any IT person a couple minutes.

Fuck him for forcing us to defend this shit without the most basic proof.

1
doug2 1 point ago +5 / -4

You're an idiot lol.

4
MushBrains2020 4 points ago +5 / -1

This is nothing but a huge circlejerk until he lets someone like Fox independently verify some of the emails. It's literally trivial to do.

If you just wanna circlejerk with your cuck buddies that's cool but I'd rather fuck the libs with some hard proof.

7
Faintlight 7 points ago +7 / -0

He may have already done this, and is waiting for dems to deny the mails are real, to be caught in another lie.

3
doug2 3 points ago +3 / -0

My cuck buddies are, well one, is as insider as it gets. It's real. Be patient sugar tits.

2
MushBrains2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

People are voting now and millions have already voted.

There's no time for this slow drip "you'll see it eventually" bullshit.

0
linhares 0 points ago +1 / -1

HUNTERS LAYWER HAS ASKED FOR THE LAPTOP BACK, FAGGOT.

3
Djt2029 3 points ago +8 / -5

This is true. I want proof the emails are actually real. Story is a bit crazy that Hunter just dropped off some laptop at a random shop with such evidence on it.

6
Anon_0xFFFF 6 points ago +9 / -3

Crazy that a crack head did something stupid? Ya, sure sounds unlikely... /s

3
Djt2029 3 points ago +4 / -1

As the poster I replied to said, it's not hard to verify. Just trying to remain objective. Biden is a POS either way.

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
3
whippeat 3 points ago +3 / -0

It can be easily proven, yet they are not

The photos are definitely real. The story is kinda crazy, but also believable. But the emails are released as screenshots or PDFs only. They are the weak link, but for some reason Rudy is refusing to offer basic proof which is easy to do.

3
MushBrains2020 3 points ago +5 / -2

NOBODY except Trump supporters believes that. The story is fucking worthless without verifying the DKIM signatures.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
4
MushBrains2020 4 points ago +5 / -1

No it's because Giuliani is acting like a fucking technically inept geezer and not providing definitive proof that would literally take 30 SECONDS to get.

2
Djt2029 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not being stupid. And they likely are. No issue in wanting some verification.

34
deleted 34 points ago +34 / -0
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
1
Elseebee 1 point ago +1 / -0

Up-wall for user name. HAHA!!

27
Bt443407 27 points ago +27 / -0

Release the goods Rudy! Ruuuudy Ruuuudy Ruuuudy!!!

25
sunnyingreenfield 25 points ago +25 / -0

The longer Rudy drags it out, the more difficult it will be for the DNC to prep a replacement. I’d wager GOETUS’s team has ads ready to go for all possible substitutions lol

11
PatrickSebast 11 points ago +11 / -0

No replacement works at this point regardless. They can't get his name off the ballots so they need to convince people to vote Joe to beat Trump and that he will then Resign and hand the reigns to Kamala or something

2
sunnyingreenfield 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe, I’ve been in the swap out Joe camp since he got the nod from the DNC. We will see what happens. Crazy times!

24
IsrorOrca 24 points ago +24 / -0

They tried to get it back!!!

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
15
DisgustedByMisleadia 15 points ago +15 / -0

Rudy, you can't wait until "10 days before the election".

People are voting NOW.

In my state, 14.4% of registered voters have already voted (as of CoB yesterday).

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
8
DisgustedByMisleadia 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's already too late.

Most states have deadlines for changes to the ballot. Those are long past.

They might be able to get a judge to change it in deep blue states, but elsewhere it's not gonna happen.

Democrats will have to say: You are voting for Kamala for Prez, and she'll nominate a VP after the election. The first order of business would be for the Senate to confirm.

But, if they did that, the election would be over, and Trump would win in a landslide.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
DisgustedByMisleadia 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, the vote would be for the "ticket", and the promise of the eventual outcome.

There is some precedent: a MO governor was running for US Senate, and died in a plane crash a couple of weeks before the election. MO law didn't allow changes to the ballot, so the new governor promised to appoint the deceased governor's wife to his post, if he won.

John Ashcroft (R-MO) became one of the few incumbents to lose to a dead man. The widow served for 2 years, and was defeated in a special election.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
scorpio_2049 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly. People are voting now. If Rudy has info voters need to know he needs to drop it SOON.

15
Lovethycountry 15 points ago +15 / -0

If you give it up all at once it will be memory holed in a week

13
guitarmastershredder 13 points ago +13 / -0

They will trickle it all out little by little until there is a big bomb of corruption and influence peddling at the end

3
scorpio_2049 3 points ago +3 / -0

The issue I have is people are already early voting for Sleepy Joe. This better be huge to where even diehard Biden supporters will just sit this vote out.

13
UndercoverSpez 13 points ago +13 / -0

Why wont he release the hard drive?

21
CandyBarr 21 points ago +21 / -0

CP

In America it's probably the worst thing to everyone but Hollywood and the DNC (same thing)

6
cob05 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's my thinking too. There has to be something on there that precludes them. The repair guy didn't call the FBI because of Hunter's nudes or crack pipe.

They also don't want the lib media leaking before they are ready or running interference for Biden.

10
here2red 10 points ago +10 / -0

They are totally overestimating how much Dems care.

They could literally watch Joe Biden rape someone and they wouldnt care.

3
iPushFatKids 3 points ago +4 / -1

It’s not the dems that need convincing, it’s the undecided normies

2
uberswank99 2 points ago +3 / -1

The mythical "undecided normie"

2
SheikFromMozambake 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're correct that there's a core of Dem support that is too evil to care. But you're wrong that this news won't have a huge impact on the election. If these developments make 25% of Dems stop and think, and 25% of them decide they can't vote for a career pay-for-play criminal, Biden loses 6.25% of his support. That would make a huge difference in the outcome of the election, flipping multiple states. It would also have profound effects in other elections for house and senate seats. This is a huge deal and the Trump administration, to their credit, is playing it for maximum effect.

9
ConstitutionNailedIt 9 points ago +9 / -0

Make them play defense as long as possible. Can't attack if you're forced to defend. Just like they did to Trump for the last 4+ years... fuck 'em.

8
aangler100 8 points ago +8 / -0

It is probably a set up, like what Project Veritas does. Get people to deny, and commit, then DROP THE HAMMER.

I think it's a cunning strategy.

1
ImWithHearse 1 point ago +3 / -2

Timing is bad though this isn’t 2016. Most of the people in my state have voted already

8
VonBustacap 8 points ago +9 / -1

The problem is, people are already voting!

4
BigMikesIke 4 points ago +6 / -2

Yeah but this is big enough to remove him if elected. Interesting dynamics here

1
VonBustacap 1 point ago +4 / -3

And leave us with Kamala as POTUS? For fuck's sake, that's a bad plan! Trump MUST win or we all lose.

.

edit: you dolts that are down voting and hoping for a Binden / Harris administration can go fuck yourselves.

2
Anon_0xFFFF 2 points ago +3 / -1

That's not how it works.

1
VonBustacap 1 point ago +1 / -0

What? If Biden/Harris are elected and Biden is then removed, Harris becomes president. This is why we must all vote and make sure Trump wins.

0
Anon_0xFFFF 0 points ago +1 / -1

What I meant is if this is "for real" criminal activity - he won't be able to run at all - leaving Harris shit out of luck.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
mnguy12000 7 points ago +7 / -0

"They've become so wealthy, they think they are Dictators, they're acting like Dictators" Never truer words said!

1
WhoElse 1 point ago +1 / -0

That was so perfect.

7
Staatssicherheit 7 points ago +8 / -1

The article focuses all on process rather than the actual crimes of corruption that the Biden family committed. Also whines about not getting the hard drive. Terrible article. Selfish. Completely focused on what the Daily Caller wants rather than the News.

Whoever wrote this article should have a talking to about what journalism should be.

7
pqsusan 7 points ago +7 / -0

If I ever get a pit bull, I'm naming him Rudy.

4
Poopypants69 4 points ago +4 / -0

If Trump landslides I will buy three pit bulls and name them Rudy, Julie, and Annie

2
pqsusan 2 points ago +2 / -0

*rescue. Please.

2
Poopypants69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ok :)

6
dirtbiscuit 6 points ago +6 / -0

hoping, hoping hoping, but with guarded cynicism, that this slow drip also calls to account negligent actors in DOJ and FBI

6
shragae 6 points ago +6 / -0

Chinese water torture -- drip, drip, drip -- otherwise known as death by a thousand cuts...

6
booblitchutz 6 points ago +6 / -0

NYP released some info today that was mildly sympathetic to Hunter, but also furthered the idea that Hunter has been acting as the “bag man” for the Bidens for a long long time.

6
kleindropper 6 points ago +6 / -0

He's learned from Project Veritas. Wait for the victim to lie and deny and then destroy them with more evidence that you held back

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
5
GreatHumungous 5 points ago +5 / -0

If you drop it all at once, they can dismiss the whole story! Drop 1 thing daily, and make them run around constantly contradicting themselves and get caught up in their own spin....I mean DUH!

5
MAGAbeast2016 5 points ago +5 / -0

Rudy taking time to line up the KILLSHOT

5
Tallsie 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think it would be wiser to release large amounts of the hard drive now honestly. Give autists a chance to scour it for information and connections on their own and meme about it. Then the MSM could release dozens of hits against the Bidens daily, rather than just a few easily ignorable ones.

Waiting until a few days before the election, where twitter and Facebook have the ability to just ban the dissemination of info for a week and block the story entirely is the wrong move for our current situation.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
SenditDownrange 5 points ago +5 / -0

I want to see the evidence, too. One, because it would put to bed the left's claims that Rudy's statements are nothing but spurious supposition and inflammatory conjecture, and two, because it's so fucking delicious.

5
GreatHumungous 5 points ago +5 / -0

You don’t want to drop it all at once, just circle around the DNC and drop a daily MOAB right up to Election Day!

5
DickTick 5 points ago +5 / -0

They will.....

Timing is important.

4
DickTick 4 points ago +4 / -0

Drip drip

4
Artymisfoul 4 points ago +4 / -0

Works fine if people are NOT ALREADY VOTING!!!!

2
WhoElse 2 points ago +2 / -0

I only know of a few that vote Dem, they don't care about facts.

4
Trumptastic 4 points ago +4 / -0

Who is Datoc? Fill a pede in.

6
Heavens2MAGAtroid 6 points ago +6 / -0

He is the interviewer, some correspondent for the Daily Caller

1
Trumptastic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh gotcha, thanks.

4
philandy 4 points ago +4 / -0

No one cares. Why the fuck isn't Joe arrested?

4
ethan123 4 points ago +4 / -0

Archive - will be there after it processes

3
fake_noose 3 points ago +3 / -0

He’s waiting until 10 days before the election? Half the people will have voted by then.

Sooner Rudy!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
PanderjitSingh 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s a perfect excuse. Covers anything and everything and the public had been primed to automatically believe it for four years.

3
rush 3 points ago +3 / -0

Interviewer kinda sucked IMO, have some more respect for Rudy

3
joebidenstouch 3 points ago +3 / -0

the slow burn just hits better

3
runonce 3 points ago +3 / -0

Simply because when you control the flow of information, you control the narrative. If you dump the whole thing the MSM will discredit (falsely) the whole thing and no matter what bits you try to play up later they just become more of the same discredited narrative. Let them chew on what you give them, one piece at a time until they choke on it.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
PanderjitSingh 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could be an effort to defang the real corruption story by associating fantasy elements about satanic pedophiles.

The biowarfare bit on the other hand is obviously true.

3
akai_ferret 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why did they wait so late to start releasing this?
A ton of people HAVE ALREADY VOTED!

We needed this out before voting started!

1
letrain 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. But it probably would of been forgotten by then. October is when people actually start paying attention. And Biden has been in his basement hiding but this month he is forced to come out and talk to people.

3
Choppermagic 3 points ago +3 / -0

Project Veritas does it too. Release some. Have the crooks make denials and expose themselves, then release more to destroy the lies. It's a great strategy especially since the media is good at distraction to the next "crisis"

3
JimmyJam 3 points ago +3 / -0

he is a prosecutor - when you are questioning a suspect you don't say "this is everything we have on you, care to comment?" No, you reveal a piece of info and you ask a question you already know the answer to, then you see if the answer is truth or a lie - then you leverage that lie. The Biden's don't know what info they have so they cannot create a strategy. The biggest issue is the media won't report it.

3
Bobb 3 points ago +3 / -0

The interviewer is rubbish.