Okay here is what has always bothered me about Q. Very few people actually see the original Q postings. I’m not even convinced that most people know where to go to see where Q posts. I used to know (I think it’s one of the Chan boards?) but over time have forgotten... my point is it’s rare/hard to find the original posts.
Also who is Q? No one really knows.
So Q posts something. Hardly anyone actually sees the original post. The posts are often cryptic AF.
Then a bunch of self proclaimed “Q experts” pump out the alleged Q post to their followers on YouTube and social media and say something like “OMG Q has posted <some cryptic post> (that you, dear viewer never actually saw) and it means “X”. OMFG It’s happening. Hillary/Obama/Deep State is going down!!!”
OR
“OMG Q has posted <some cryptic post> (that you, again, dear viewer never actually saw) and it means “X”. Q is Trump/Pence/Secret Service/Trumps Inner Circle. TRUST THE PLAN.”
So I’m supposed to trust some random post from some random person that I never actually saw firsthand and it means EVERYTHING! Nope sorry.
I have friends who are Q followers and we’ve discussed this at length. I’ve looked into Q. I can’t definitely say it’s not true as much as I can’t say that it is. There’s all this “proof” of posts being real or confirming something that happened. But I never saw those original posts and have no idea when these posts were first posted. I feel that when I step back and look at the big picture following Q feels very flimsy.
Ultimately, I only have so much time each day to read the news, and stay engaged. I would rather spend that time on actual fact based information that is clear and based on information that we know for sure.
For example: Rudy and the NYPost have Hunters laptop and are dripping the data out. I think we can all agree this is a real, actual thing that is happening. I trust Rudy. Knowing who he is and his background furthers my trust in him.
Would rather focus on real, actual news happening now rather than some cryptic post I never originally saw posted somewhere by an anonymous source that definitely means “X”. Again I have friends who follow Q and they can spend their time as they wish. But I think it’s silly and a waste of time. There is plenty of other news and information from sources who I know and trust that I’d rather spend my time looking at.
I’m also not a Q person. But it’s weird how left media is so fixated on it. It think Q is silly, but people are entitled to their beliefs.
The left is terrified of diversity of thought.
I'm not a q fag either, but since we are here to talk to each other, what about it do you think is silly?
Okay here is what has always bothered me about Q. Very few people actually see the original Q postings. I’m not even convinced that most people know where to go to see where Q posts. I used to know (I think it’s one of the Chan boards?) but over time have forgotten... my point is it’s rare/hard to find the original posts.
Also who is Q? No one really knows.
So Q posts something. Hardly anyone actually sees the original post. The posts are often cryptic AF.
Then a bunch of self proclaimed “Q experts” pump out the alleged Q post to their followers on YouTube and social media and say something like “OMG Q has posted <some cryptic post> (that you, dear viewer never actually saw) and it means “X”. OMFG It’s happening. Hillary/Obama/Deep State is going down!!!” OR “OMG Q has posted <some cryptic post> (that you, again, dear viewer never actually saw) and it means “X”. Q is Trump/Pence/Secret Service/Trumps Inner Circle. TRUST THE PLAN.”
So I’m supposed to trust some random post from some random person that I never actually saw firsthand and it means EVERYTHING! Nope sorry.
I have friends who are Q followers and we’ve discussed this at length. I’ve looked into Q. I can’t definitely say it’s not true as much as I can’t say that it is. There’s all this “proof” of posts being real or confirming something that happened. But I never saw those original posts and have no idea when these posts were first posted. I feel that when I step back and look at the big picture following Q feels very flimsy.
Ultimately, I only have so much time each day to read the news, and stay engaged. I would rather spend that time on actual fact based information that is clear and based on information that we know for sure. For example: Rudy and the NYPost have Hunters laptop and are dripping the data out. I think we can all agree this is a real, actual thing that is happening. I trust Rudy. Knowing who he is and his background furthers my trust in him.
Would rather focus on real, actual news happening now rather than some cryptic post I never originally saw posted somewhere by an anonymous source that definitely means “X”. Again I have friends who follow Q and they can spend their time as they wish. But I think it’s silly and a waste of time. There is plenty of other news and information from sources who I know and trust that I’d rather spend my time looking at.