89
Comments (7)
sorted by:
2
TheSHazDroid [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

And what if something happens very close to Election Day? It’d probably be really hard to pick a replacement in time to update ballots, as most deadlines to certify state ballots would have passed by early October — not to mention other logistical hurdles that could pose problems, such as mailing ballots for overseas military service members in time, or making last-minute adjustments to absentee ballots. It’s entirely possible that if the candidate died only a few days before Nov. 3, voters might not know who the party’s nominee was when they go to the polls.

Again, neither party has experienced this at the top of the ticket, but Republicans did have this happen to a vice presidential candidate in 1912, when sitting Vice President James Sherman died on Oct. 30, just days before the election. This left insufficient time for the RNC to meet and nominate a replacement to join President William Howard Taft on the GOP ticket, but it was also largely a moot point as Taft lost to Woodrow Wilson. The RNC still chose a replacement, Nicholas Murray Butler, president of Columbia University, who received all eight of Sherman’s electoral votes, but it’s unclear whether a new presidential pick would receive the electoral votes intended for the original nominee today.

That’s because, unlike in 1912, more than half the states have laws that attempt to bind electors to a state’s vote. In fact, there’s an ongoing case in front of the Supreme Court about whether members of the Electoral College are free to vote for whomever they want or whether state laws can require them to vote a certain way. And depending on how the court rules, that could affect the ability of individual states to adjust for the unexpected death of a presidential nominee. For instance, Michigan’s law requires an elector to vote for the ticket named on the ballot whereas Florida’s rules say that an elector is to “vote for the candidates of the party that he or she was nominated to represent.”

1
thedonaldsomething 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't see how it helps trump. If Biden is out then kamAla or someone else is next. Doesn't help trump since Biden has no support, only people who hate trump and will vote blue regardless.

5
TheSHazDroid [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Kamala is less likeable Hillary

2
thedonaldsomething 2 points ago +2 / -0

Doesn't matter at all. Nobody is voting Biden because it's Biden. Just like nobody will be voting Kamala because it's kamala. They are voting blue regardless.

2
Bragg 2 points ago +2 / -0

If Biden is out before the elections, democrats are fucked because Biden is already on most of the ballots and a votes have been cast for him lol

1
M3CJC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Biden has more support then Kamala does though, without Biden it’s a fucking blood bath

1
JohnJRambo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I still believe with all this early voting and media on Biden’s side, this info should be released asap