2901 One person, in person, means one vote. (media.patriots.win) posted 182 days ago by savman 182 days ago by savman +2901 / -0 91 comments share 91 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (91) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 1 ▼ – Scuffers 1 point 182 days ago +1 / -0 yup, third world countries do a better job, Finger print on ballot paper in indelible ink imagine how fast you could cut out multiple votes like this... even if they could get the ink off, computer scanning of every ballot could check for duplicate fingerprints. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Italians_Invented_2A 1 point 182 days ago +1 / -0 It would be enough to have a single database with all voter registrations to prevent people from voting twice. However, it's not as a secure as the fingerprint ink. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Scuffers 1 point 182 days ago +1 / -0 not suggesting instead of, I'm taking as well as. if the fingerprint scanning was done federally, it would be a good verification to the states own counts as well as being able to spot people voting in two states... permalink parent save report block reply
yup, third world countries do a better job,
Finger print on ballot paper in indelible ink
imagine how fast you could cut out multiple votes like this...
even if they could get the ink off, computer scanning of every ballot could check for duplicate fingerprints.
It would be enough to have a single database with all voter registrations to prevent people from voting twice.
However, it's not as a secure as the fingerprint ink.
not suggesting instead of, I'm taking as well as.
if the fingerprint scanning was done federally, it would be a good verification to the states own counts as well as being able to spot people voting in two states...