There was a NYT article from 2015 or so around the time CA defunded the forest management services and the officials were specifically stating this would happen.
Then because their readers completely forgot and want to care about climate change/communism/hating Drumpf they just published a bunch of bullshit.
"How Trump's Stubborn And Racist Refusal To Provide Additional Tax-Payer Funds To Adopt California's Illegal Immigrant Population Forced The Defunding of Forest Management"
You won't be surprised but this already happened, since they couched Trump's initial refusal to federally-fund the fuckup as exactly that: Drumpf preventing them from solving the problem. Had liberal retard friends texting each other that very sentiment yesterday.
These days, if you can imagine a TDS moron interpreting something that way, it's already happening. It's like a political Rule 34: if you can imagine a frantic emotionally-incontinent drug-addicted half-shaved-head 28 year old feminist HerTurn womyn recording a meltdown about it for her IG feed, someone somewhere has actually already posted it.
My sister (lives in Seattle now) is claiming this, and has since they started. I point out the laws and regulations along with all the arson arrests, but she still screeches about it being Trump's fault.
I heard on a radio show a few weeks ago that California was looking at adopting the "Native American" way of keeping massive forest fires from occurring.
Said "by saying it this way, we won't have to credit Trump...but it's the same thing he proposed"
Today, many scholars disagree that the original inhabitants of the Americas had little impact on the environment. Calling this the myth of the “ecologically invisible” American Indian, critics instead believe that Native Americans altered the land to better suit their needs. Based on archaeological evidence (mainly charcoal deposits and pollen records), in addition to eyewitness accounts by European explorers, many experts now contend that prehistoric people deliberately set fires to accomplish a variety of tasks.
CA used to have no problem with forest management. Then some environmental policy was enacted to protect the kangaroo mouse or something. This mouse lives in the felled forest biome. The policy forbade clearing the dead underbrush and wood. Then a fire aggressively roars through and destroys the habitat and the mouse too.
Ive known about forest fire management since a forestry field trip when I was 5. The left is unsolving all of the things we knew in the 90s and calling it science.
So.... Trump was right? Of course he was.
There was a NYT article from 2015 or so around the time CA defunded the forest management services and the officials were specifically stating this would happen.
Then because their readers completely forgot and want to care about climate change/communism/hating Drumpf they just published a bunch of bullshit.
"No, you're just anti-science! What do fire experts know about fire?"
-Leftist
A couple of years ago when they started here in the Bay, people blamed PGE, sued, and won. Now it’s suddenly climate change / Trump? Give me a break.
Silicon Valley congressman: California should take control of PG&E as wildfire blackouts persist
Hmmm
I predict the "clearing" will be done in the remaining areas they want for the high-speed train, since the paradise fires followed that path exactly.
I will look for the link, but I read Newsom is not giving up on it, they just switched the infrastructure work under a new name.
In a week's time they'll be running stories about how Drumpf prevented them from managing forests properly.
"How Trump's Stubborn And Racist Refusal To Provide Additional Tax-Payer Funds To Adopt California's Illegal Immigrant Population Forced The Defunding of Forest Management"
That sounds like a NPR article....yuck..
You won't be surprised but this already happened, since they couched Trump's initial refusal to federally-fund the fuckup as exactly that: Drumpf preventing them from solving the problem. Had liberal retard friends texting each other that very sentiment yesterday.
These days, if you can imagine a TDS moron interpreting something that way, it's already happening. It's like a political Rule 34: if you can imagine a frantic emotionally-incontinent drug-addicted half-shaved-head 28 year old feminist HerTurn womyn recording a meltdown about it for her IG feed, someone somewhere has actually already posted it.
We should call it Rule 45
Well, that's pretty much perfect.
My sister (lives in Seattle now) is claiming this, and has since they started. I point out the laws and regulations along with all the arson arrests, but she still screeches about it being Trump's fault.
Next the hippies will be screaming that the Forests "cant breef" because they are choked.
I heard on a radio show a few weeks ago that California was looking at adopting the "Native American" way of keeping massive forest fires from occurring.
Said "by saying it this way, we won't have to credit Trump...but it's the same thing he proposed"
CA used to have no problem with forest management. Then some environmental policy was enacted to protect the kangaroo mouse or something. This mouse lives in the felled forest biome. The policy forbade clearing the dead underbrush and wood. Then a fire aggressively roars through and destroys the habitat and the mouse too.
Makes sense?
yep.
Save the mouse, but kill the people who live in houses... makes perfect sense.
And even worse, kill the mouse anyways - in fact all the mice. Typical result of leftard policy.
Democrats. You know, rats watching out for other rodents.
New England currently has more forest than it did when the Pilgrims arrived. The natives used slash and burn agriculture in many areas.
Lol, yeah, well, that was they way we had always don’t it that they stopped soooo they’re retarded once again
No shit. The woods are full of felled timber which is not been allowed to be cleaned out.
Top KEK
This is Russian Disinformation. Forrest Fires have always been caused by Global Warming.
Don't forget to throw in FBI informants/whyte supremacy(BLM+anarchists) for maximum gaslighting
Gosh. I swear I heard that before.
Liberals caused this
Well, no, not Liberals - now we call them what they really are - Communist
Real Liberals are Trump supporters as they believe in liberty.
They’re unarmed source with fire expertise is Trump
About time.
Its always the 2 I's that start massive fires, Idiots and Islam.
Isn't this LITERALLY what GEOTUS talked about before the wildfires in California started blowing up? https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1190995034163892226
Why did you post this again?
Ive known about forest fire management since a forestry field trip when I was 5. The left is unsolving all of the things we knew in the 90s and calling it science.
In my mind I see chaingangs of ANTIFA, swinging brush hooks.... for years.
So, orange man correct?
NBC reporters are like "Editors are asleep. Post the truth!"
Big beautiful rakes!
That photo looks like it could be the cover artwork for a heavy metal album.
They just gave Trump a new nickname: The Fire Expert. I like it...
Trump.
Fire expert.
Confirmed.
If they would just stop REEing and just listen to the man a bit.
WTF??? NBC isn't allowed to tell the truth, this is harmful and debunked.
BUT MUH CLARMAT CHARNGE!!!!
Decades of mismanagement led to choked swamps, now it's time to clear them out, experts who are tempted to use fire say. :)
Who could have predicted this?
"97% of California is Federal land." - Newsom, probably
What year was this posted?
The simulation is broken again....
What a sudden and completely unforeseen breakthrough!
Bullshit, it was climate change!
t. Liberal Retard
The question is WHY a Leftist news org like NBC would write a story highlighting Leftist mismanagement?
Hmm. Are you SURE?
I thought it was muh global warming, so trump was right the whole time
BUT MUH ENVROMENT
But muh cLiMaTe cHAnGe!
Didn't we hear something along these lines from the forester in chief recently?