5698
Comments (638)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
29
Imilliterateandim26 29 points ago +30 / -1

Dude for real why aren't they talking emails

20
permissible_missile 20 points ago +21 / -1

Because there's one email, singular and it's basically nothing without context that, like cucked soyboy @Jack after 35 minutes of cock and ball torture, probably will never come

15
HocusLocus 15 points ago +15 / -0

IT is... (one) (pdf picture of a) (smart ass cryptic ketchup comment) (single page of) (an unidentified email) no email source or metadata (Clapper pointed this out right away, was right for once in his miserable life)

So (as the story goes) we're ready to expose billions of dollars in quid pro quo and take on the Red Dragon, but we're too terrified to leave email address domains unredacted. Something's not just fishy here, it seems childishly dumb, even more horrifying.

I feel as if I woke up on the set of the movie Idiocracy and went outside to discover the world was in even worse shape.

-1
VetforTrump -1 points ago +1 / -2

First the announcement of the existence of wrong doing. Then denial Then proof

-2
Maganotical -2 points ago +1 / -3

Use your brain dumbass.

OMGGG NO METADETTTAAAAAA OMGGGGGGG hahahah

-3
Maganotical -3 points ago +1 / -4

You're wrong, noob. You don't follow jack so you don't know about the rest.