Alright, coming from a legal angle this looks like they are just using hunters last name as leverage to gain favorable business dealings. While we all agree this is absolutely corrupt, it doesn't implicate joe directly? I know this is the first of many, but I will continue to keep my hopes at bay.
Do be patient for the other emails.
Sorry, no source at the moment, so you certainly should verify my memory:
In the email that breaks down $$ distribution, with 10% going to "the big guy," FOX contacted one of the email parties who affirmed that the email was legit and "the big guy" was, indeed, Joe Biden.
The various email chains demonstrate Joe taking meetings with people, inculding corrupt individuals, at the behest of his son's business interests including when they weren't able to get a meeting with US admins otherwise. Thus, tax payer-funded activities (and I suspect we will later see clear links to policies as well) were determined by Hunter's business interests.
That particular email shows Joe getting a kickback himself from the quid pro quo....not that it really matters as he was also enriching multiple family members. But, the personal kickback is indefensible with the usual "I had nothing to do with it" or "I didn't know"
Alright, coming from a legal angle this looks like they are just using hunters last name as leverage to gain favorable business dealings. While we all agree this is absolutely corrupt, it doesn't implicate joe directly? I know this is the first of many, but I will continue to keep my hopes at bay.
This is #1-4 of 26,700. Enjoy.
Do be patient for the other emails. Sorry, no source at the moment, so you certainly should verify my memory: In the email that breaks down $$ distribution, with 10% going to "the big guy," FOX contacted one of the email parties who affirmed that the email was legit and "the big guy" was, indeed, Joe Biden.
The various email chains demonstrate Joe taking meetings with people, inculding corrupt individuals, at the behest of his son's business interests including when they weren't able to get a meeting with US admins otherwise. Thus, tax payer-funded activities (and I suspect we will later see clear links to policies as well) were determined by Hunter's business interests.
That particular email shows Joe getting a kickback himself from the quid pro quo....not that it really matters as he was also enriching multiple family members. But, the personal kickback is indefensible with the usual "I had nothing to do with it" or "I didn't know"