This is entirely correct same goes for "bring troops out of the Middle East". Drop the anti-Semitism though, it's all about money and there are plenty of non Jewish billionaires and politicians who are part of this.
Talking about a group that makes up about 90% of the top 1% while only being roughly 2% of the population is strictly verboten. The schools and entertainment industry have done an effective job of programming a significant portion of people to reflexively recoil from such discussion without considering it.
Muh ‘they’re Dual citizenship’ is very 2016 Stormfront if you ask me, such a stretch that nobody uses it anymore, there’s gotta be better concerns coming out??
Have an honest discussion about it without knee jerk emotional reactions. Banks, media, hollywood, etc. What are the implications of this massive influence?
No, it's just the other side of the coin isn't looked at. For example, a common trope is to point out that communism sprung out from the wells of the Jewish people. Yet only 37% of the founding communist party was Jewish, and only 16% thereafter pre-Stalin.
So you might say - see! 2% of the population and 37% of the population! And you use that as some sort of rationale and justification to shift blame on a whole group of people. Yet when you look at the other side you had Christian slavs who made up the rest of the 63% and 84%, respectively. So if 30% of US billionaires are Jews, why not look at who the other 70% are and posit to blame them equally if not more just based on sheer proportion?
Jamie Dimon is Greek-Orthodox, a billionaire, and is the head of JP Morgan. Johnny Morris is the founder of CEO and founder of Bass Pro shops and he's Christian. The fact of the matter is that more than 70% of US Billionaires are not Jewish.
I'll take it a step further - MORE than HALF of the world's millionairres and billionairres? So why aren't we looking at those statistics?
Is the criticism against Jews really about Jews being over-represented or is it because people don't like the fact that they are?
The implications are absolutely the same as if they were run by people of British, French, Greek, or any other Gentile group. Unless you're trying to imply some coordinated Jewish social-engineering. If these entities were all controlled by citizens of a particular foreign country and THAT was their common denominator, then sure, we can discuss possible nefarious motives or consequences.
Because Israel is one of the only, if not the only, secular democracies in the entire region in addition to being a stalwart ally. This is evidenced by the recent peace accords. They take a lot of shit from the Iranians, in many ways acting as a proxy for the US. It has ZERO to do with Jewish heritage/religion.
Scenario A: Most American politicians are honest, incorruptible people who always put America first and aren't in the pockets of their donors
or Scenario B: Most American politicians rabidly support Israel (regardless of whether it benefits the general American populace) because their donors pay them to
"Of the top 50 political donors to either party at the federal level in 2018, 52 percent were Jewish and 48 percent were gentile. Individuals who identify as Jewish are usually estimated to make up perhaps 2.2 percent of the population.
Of the $675 million given by the top 50 donors, 66 percent of the money came from Jews and 34 percent from gentiles.
Of the $297 million that GOP candidates and conservative causes received from the top 50 donors, 56 percent was from Jewish individuals.
Of the $361 million Democratic politicians and liberal causes received, 76 percent came from Jewish givers."
That doesn't mean every American Jew is some evil person put to get you. It does mean that most of our politicians are willing to sell out to the interests of a foreign nation because people like Sheldon Adelson and Haim Saban pay them to.
In addition, stalwart ally is not the term I would use to describe Israel. They're a pretty lousy ally. We give them a quarter TRILLION in foreign aid and they turn around and sell the military tech we give them to China.
lol as if international politics is a binary choice. Name a better ally in the Middle East. Oh, right, there isn’t one.
We support Israel because we need a foothold in the region and they’re the best option and have been for decades. Do they want our help? Absolutely. That’s how alliances work. Are there big donors who want to maintain the relationship? Obviously, why wouldn’t there be when there’s also a ton of money spent by the pro-Palestinian movement? When you have Ilhan Omar and the BDS crap happening, of course Adelson pours money in to support pro-Israel candidates.
It's funny how no subset of Judaism can ever possibly be criticized.
"Rich, brown haired, sexually aggressive, pedo-predator, tribal, racist, asshole Jews...those the ones I do not care for!"
"OMG, anti-Semitism!!"
And no one sees how this could eeever possibly backfire. Anyways, I didn't make the nene and frankly didn't even e the fugging bottom left until after I posted it but... WHO REALLY GIVES A SHIT?
This is entirely correct same goes for "bring troops out of the Middle East". Drop the anti-Semitism though, it's all about money and there are plenty of non Jewish billionaires and politicians who are part of this.
Talking about a group that makes up about 90% of the top 1% while only being roughly 2% of the population is strictly verboten. The schools and entertainment industry have done an effective job of programming a significant portion of people to reflexively recoil from such discussion without considering it.
Lmfao 90%. Prove it please
You can absolutely talk about it, but pretending Jews specifically are behind the idea of White Privilege makes no sense.
Muh ‘they’re Dual citizenship’ is very 2016 Stormfront if you ask me, such a stretch that nobody uses it anymore, there’s gotta be better concerns coming out??
You can bring it, up but shallow generalisations are dumb. Dumb generalisations like Jews "control the media and banks".
Jewish journalists literally write articles mocking people who don’t know that Jewish people own Hollywood
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2008-dec-19-oe-stein19-story.html
No the can certainly be criticised. But claiming they are exclusively behind White Privilege is a dumb generalisation.
Criticized as individuals. No need for the "International Jewry" conspiracy BS that is being peddled with a wink and a nudge.
Show me on the chart posted where it says that.
"look at these observable facts"
"Whoa, cool it with the antisemitism"
It's not "observable" facts. It's a false generalisation that Jews specifically are behind the idea of White Privilege.
Cool. A lot of Jews run banks. What's the point then? What's the next argument? What are you going to do about it?
Have an honest discussion about it without knee jerk emotional reactions. Banks, media, hollywood, etc. What are the implications of this massive influence?
No, it's just the other side of the coin isn't looked at. For example, a common trope is to point out that communism sprung out from the wells of the Jewish people. Yet only 37% of the founding communist party was Jewish, and only 16% thereafter pre-Stalin.
So you might say - see! 2% of the population and 37% of the population! And you use that as some sort of rationale and justification to shift blame on a whole group of people. Yet when you look at the other side you had Christian slavs who made up the rest of the 63% and 84%, respectively. So if 30% of US billionaires are Jews, why not look at who the other 70% are and posit to blame them equally if not more just based on sheer proportion?
Jamie Dimon is Greek-Orthodox, a billionaire, and is the head of JP Morgan. Johnny Morris is the founder of CEO and founder of Bass Pro shops and he's Christian. The fact of the matter is that more than 70% of US Billionaires are not Jewish.
I'll take it a step further - MORE than HALF of the world's millionairres and billionairres? So why aren't we looking at those statistics?
Is the criticism against Jews really about Jews being over-represented or is it because people don't like the fact that they are?
The implications are absolutely the same as if they were run by people of British, French, Greek, or any other Gentile group. Unless you're trying to imply some coordinated Jewish social-engineering. If these entities were all controlled by citizens of a particular foreign country and THAT was their common denominator, then sure, we can discuss possible nefarious motives or consequences.
Half the reason we’re in the Middle East is to protect Israel
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Clean_Break:_A_New_Strategy_for_Securing_the_Realm
https://www.haaretz.com/1.4764706
Because Israel is one of the only, if not the only, secular democracies in the entire region in addition to being a stalwart ally. This is evidenced by the recent peace accords. They take a lot of shit from the Iranians, in many ways acting as a proxy for the US. It has ZERO to do with Jewish heritage/religion.
Which scenario seems more likely to you?
Scenario A: Most American politicians are honest, incorruptible people who always put America first and aren't in the pockets of their donors
or Scenario B: Most American politicians rabidly support Israel (regardless of whether it benefits the general American populace) because their donors pay them to
"Of the top 50 political donors to either party at the federal level in 2018, 52 percent were Jewish and 48 percent were gentile. Individuals who identify as Jewish are usually estimated to make up perhaps 2.2 percent of the population.
Of the $675 million given by the top 50 donors, 66 percent of the money came from Jews and 34 percent from gentiles.
Of the $297 million that GOP candidates and conservative causes received from the top 50 donors, 56 percent was from Jewish individuals.
Of the $361 million Democratic politicians and liberal causes received, 76 percent came from Jewish givers."
https://www.takimag.com/article/truth-or-trope/
That doesn't mean every American Jew is some evil person put to get you. It does mean that most of our politicians are willing to sell out to the interests of a foreign nation because people like Sheldon Adelson and Haim Saban pay them to.
In addition, stalwart ally is not the term I would use to describe Israel. They're a pretty lousy ally. We give them a quarter TRILLION in foreign aid and they turn around and sell the military tech we give them to China.
https://www.military.com/defensetech/2013/12/24/report-israel-passes-u-s-military-technology-to-china
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/business/.premium-u-s-aid-to-israel-234-billion-over-60-years-1.5234820
lol as if international politics is a binary choice. Name a better ally in the Middle East. Oh, right, there isn’t one.
We support Israel because we need a foothold in the region and they’re the best option and have been for decades. Do they want our help? Absolutely. That’s how alliances work. Are there big donors who want to maintain the relationship? Obviously, why wouldn’t there be when there’s also a ton of money spent by the pro-Palestinian movement? When you have Ilhan Omar and the BDS crap happening, of course Adelson pours money in to support pro-Israel candidates.
Candidates like GEOTUS.
It's funny how no subset of Judaism can ever possibly be criticized.
"Rich, brown haired, sexually aggressive, pedo-predator, tribal, racist, asshole Jews...those the ones I do not care for!"
"OMG, anti-Semitism!!"
And no one sees how this could eeever possibly backfire. Anyways, I didn't make the nene and frankly didn't even e the fugging bottom left until after I posted it but... WHO REALLY GIVES A SHIT?