Have an honest discussion about it without knee jerk emotional reactions. Banks, media, hollywood, etc. What are the implications of this massive influence?
No, it's just the other side of the coin isn't looked at. For example, a common trope is to point out that communism sprung out from the wells of the Jewish people. Yet only 37% of the founding communist party was Jewish, and only 16% thereafter pre-Stalin.
So you might say - see! 2% of the population and 37% of the population! And you use that as some sort of rationale and justification to shift blame on a whole group of people. Yet when you look at the other side you had Christian slavs who made up the rest of the 63% and 84%, respectively. So if 30% of US billionaires are Jews, why not look at who the other 70% are and posit to blame them equally if not more just based on sheer proportion?
Jamie Dimon is Greek-Orthodox, a billionaire, and is the head of JP Morgan. Johnny Morris is the founder of CEO and founder of Bass Pro shops and he's Christian. The fact of the matter is that more than 70% of US Billionaires are not Jewish.
I'll take it a step further - MORE than HALF of the world's millionairres and billionairres? So why aren't we looking at those statistics?
Is the criticism against Jews really about Jews being over-represented or is it because people don't like the fact that they are?
Dont dare to challenge the Stormfags that are flooding this site, lest you be lumped in with the wide-ranging Jewish international conspiracy controlling everyone.............
The implications are absolutely the same as if they were run by people of British, French, Greek, or any other Gentile group. Unless you're trying to imply some coordinated Jewish social-engineering. If these entities were all controlled by citizens of a particular foreign country and THAT was their common denominator, then sure, we can discuss possible nefarious motives or consequences.
Have an honest discussion about it without knee jerk emotional reactions. Banks, media, hollywood, etc. What are the implications of this massive influence?
No, it's just the other side of the coin isn't looked at. For example, a common trope is to point out that communism sprung out from the wells of the Jewish people. Yet only 37% of the founding communist party was Jewish, and only 16% thereafter pre-Stalin.
So you might say - see! 2% of the population and 37% of the population! And you use that as some sort of rationale and justification to shift blame on a whole group of people. Yet when you look at the other side you had Christian slavs who made up the rest of the 63% and 84%, respectively. So if 30% of US billionaires are Jews, why not look at who the other 70% are and posit to blame them equally if not more just based on sheer proportion?
Jamie Dimon is Greek-Orthodox, a billionaire, and is the head of JP Morgan. Johnny Morris is the founder of CEO and founder of Bass Pro shops and he's Christian. The fact of the matter is that more than 70% of US Billionaires are not Jewish.
I'll take it a step further - MORE than HALF of the world's millionairres and billionairres? So why aren't we looking at those statistics?
Is the criticism against Jews really about Jews being over-represented or is it because people don't like the fact that they are?
“Guys, a group of people being over represented by a magnitude of 15x is completely unremarkable!”
It’s like if you were a peasant in medieval Europe insisting that it didn’t matter that all the barons and counts were related to each other
Strawman and false equivalency. So you're not going to tackle what I am saying? Great. 👍
Dont dare to challenge the Stormfags that are flooding this site, lest you be lumped in with the wide-ranging Jewish international conspiracy controlling everyone.............
That’s what you’re doing with your reply
I already easily explained the problem with your line of reasoning
A demographic being over represented by a magnitude of 15x is remarkable
Your bemusement that people would want to discuss this issue is either insincere or irrational
The implications are absolutely the same as if they were run by people of British, French, Greek, or any other Gentile group. Unless you're trying to imply some coordinated Jewish social-engineering. If these entities were all controlled by citizens of a particular foreign country and THAT was their common denominator, then sure, we can discuss possible nefarious motives or consequences.
Different people are different
If those organizations were dominated by Hungarians they would be different than if they were dominated by Koreans