311
Comments (12)
sorted by:
14
sleepwhenimdead 14 points ago +14 / -0

If Wikipedia says it’s debunked then I guess it’s all settled 🤷‍♂️

5
AK1911 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is almost word for word what goes through every liberal’s head right before they stick it in the sand.

7
CuzImAtWork 7 points ago +7 / -0

Go check the edit history for the term '86'. There were nearly 50 in one day yesterday, looks like it's up to almost 100 now with them trying to remove "killing someone" from the description, that had been in the description for years, until yesterday after someone pointed out the 86-45 in Whitmer's interview.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=86_(term)&action=history

Watch 1984 happen in real-time.

5
Under25BMI 5 points ago +5 / -0

I looked back. If you check the 2018 edits, they include a list of pop-culture references in movies etc.

INCLUDING CSI:NY - Char's used this term "86'd" in multiple episodes to reference a killing.

1
Rainman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wouldn't it be great if we could make truthful edits and then lock the page.

3
ItsOkToMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Alt right, white supremacists leverage hate-filled website to push false and debunked narrative that water is wet, and the sky is blue."

5
lacker101 5 points ago +5 / -0

Russia collusion: 4 years hundred million dollars. Bush era aide arrested on unassociated charges.

Biden drives: debunked after 10 minutes of intern wiki editing.

Seems legit guys. Wrap it up

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
pray_for_kekistan 2 points ago +3 / -1

oh god ohh god oh gawwwwwwd.....

3
WPg8r 3 points ago +3 / -0

There was a time I was tempted to donate to Wikipedia. Glad I didn’t.

4
insickness [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh god. You reminded me that I once did. I feel so dirty now.