The only way these people are able to sleep at night is on a pile of money. Time for 65 million Americans to make that mattress a little thinner by pulling back their money and advertising revenue. You need to maintain a voice on some of these platforms unfortunately but you have no excuse not to boycott spying operations like Instagram and Facebook as a shot across the bow to the tech companies.
Why do you "need to maintain a voice on these platforms"? I have never understood this reasoning. Aside from being simply untrue if taken at face value (no one needs to be on Twitter. You won't die. I promise), it seems like circular logic to me. We want to reduce the influence of Twitter, but I can't get off Twitter because reasons, which removes the most effective means you have of reducing the influence of Twitter.
Maybe I don't get it, though. Why do you have to have this presence on platforms that hate you?
Twitter is an important platform to defend and promote your views, as well as interact with others. Facebook is more about you bitching to family and friends, annoying them. Instagram is even more useless, as it largely is a place to look at photos of celebrities whoring themselves out and laughably trying to interact with them.
You can cut off Facebook, IG, Netflix, and TikTok with ease. Twitter, YouTube, and Amazon are more difficult for all but the monk-class of conservatives.
Twitter is a brand name. The actual functions of the Twitter platform could be duplicated by a semi-talented team of developers in a couple weeks, tops. Without the content, Twitter is nothing. Users are the content. So it's really this simple: If you want Twitter to be less influential, stop using Twitter.
Twitter needs Donald Trump far more than he needs Twitter. That has everything to do with why they hate him so much.
Of course the functions of Twitter could be duplicated, and there’s nothing inherent in the coding that couldn’t be done elsewhere. What they do have, which is extremely difficult to replicate is their network in place and user base. Government agencies, corporations, and public figures all use Twitter, and some as their primary means of communication to the public. It’s not going to go away just because conservatives migrate away from that site. Institutions and public figures will need to stop using it, for it to be replaced. Even if Trump moved, it would hardly be enough.
Unfortunately Twitter is needed, and has become a defacto public utility form of communication with elected officials, corporations, and other important institutions. If that was removed, then yes, Twitter would be unimportant. The truth is that it has become one of the sole means of communication for societal functions. Denying access to their platform, is denying communication with essential institutions and arguably the public at large.
If what you say is true, then Twitter is the modern public square and should be nationalized, as the very idea of it being owned by a company or individual is a threat to liberty, no matter how they moderate it.
Personally, I think the low information voter/normie meme is way over played. People seek out media that reinforces what they believe. What difference does it make how much a person pays attention, in that case?
That's why I don't buy this idea that Twitter is somehow crucial to the national narrative. There is no national narrative. If there were, Twitter would just ban all conservatives and be done with it, they'd own the narrative. They can't do that, not because of some threat of more toothless regulation, but because like all talent agents and aggregators, they are playing a delicate game. They can't have people leaving en mass, if they did it would break the perception that Twitter is this important place for discussion. Because that's all it is; a perception.
It's amazing. As soon as Trump rode that escalator and described the centerpieces of his campaign, many of us knew he would be the next president. As soon as Trump was elected the first time, we all knew that the summer of 2020 would feature DNC-supported mass rioting, and that September-October 2020 would see massive censorship on social media sites.
The fact these social media companies keep banning conservatives/Republicans while giving violent leftists a free pass to say and do whatever they want, makes me believe they’re are fully complicit in, and actively supporting Antifa/radical terrorism. These companies should be treated no differently than China - they are hostile combatants, directly working to undermine our country’s laws and protections. Shut them down now!
NOPE, last night HE was complaining about the IG ban. NOW Twitter has banned him. Here is the link to his account. https://twitter.com/TeamSaveAmerica/
This is the first step towards fascism. No joke. Knock a black man's teeth out in the name of ending racism and ban him from social media so he can't complain about it.
Get a Fricken Lawyer and get paid. 230 needs a legal challenge and this is made for TV, Sorry for your pain and suffering but need to be compensated TREMENDOUSLY. There are lots of lawyers that will take your case. You know which ones.
Store up, Arm up, Standby (but not for very much longer)
This WAS his account: https://twitter.com/TeamSaveAmerica/
F
F
Proving his point most vociferously
The only way these people are able to sleep at night is on a pile of money. Time for 65 million Americans to make that mattress a little thinner by pulling back their money and advertising revenue. You need to maintain a voice on some of these platforms unfortunately but you have no excuse not to boycott spying operations like Instagram and Facebook as a shot across the bow to the tech companies.
Why do you "need to maintain a voice on these platforms"? I have never understood this reasoning. Aside from being simply untrue if taken at face value (no one needs to be on Twitter. You won't die. I promise), it seems like circular logic to me. We want to reduce the influence of Twitter, but I can't get off Twitter because reasons, which removes the most effective means you have of reducing the influence of Twitter.
Maybe I don't get it, though. Why do you have to have this presence on platforms that hate you?
Twitter is an important platform to defend and promote your views, as well as interact with others. Facebook is more about you bitching to family and friends, annoying them. Instagram is even more useless, as it largely is a place to look at photos of celebrities whoring themselves out and laughably trying to interact with them.
You can cut off Facebook, IG, Netflix, and TikTok with ease. Twitter, YouTube, and Amazon are more difficult for all but the monk-class of conservatives.
Twitter is a brand name. The actual functions of the Twitter platform could be duplicated by a semi-talented team of developers in a couple weeks, tops. Without the content, Twitter is nothing. Users are the content. So it's really this simple: If you want Twitter to be less influential, stop using Twitter.
Twitter needs Donald Trump far more than he needs Twitter. That has everything to do with why they hate him so much.
Of course the functions of Twitter could be duplicated, and there’s nothing inherent in the coding that couldn’t be done elsewhere. What they do have, which is extremely difficult to replicate is their network in place and user base. Government agencies, corporations, and public figures all use Twitter, and some as their primary means of communication to the public. It’s not going to go away just because conservatives migrate away from that site. Institutions and public figures will need to stop using it, for it to be replaced. Even if Trump moved, it would hardly be enough.
Unfortunately Twitter is needed, and has become a defacto public utility form of communication with elected officials, corporations, and other important institutions. If that was removed, then yes, Twitter would be unimportant. The truth is that it has become one of the sole means of communication for societal functions. Denying access to their platform, is denying communication with essential institutions and arguably the public at large.
If what you say is true, then Twitter is the modern public square and should be nationalized, as the very idea of it being owned by a company or individual is a threat to liberty, no matter how they moderate it.
Because 50% or more of the voter base are normies who only half pay attention and when they do it's mostly on FB, IG, tiktok ect
That is why FB and twitter want to bsn anything pro Trump. To convince normies orange man is bad.
Personally, I think the low information voter/normie meme is way over played. People seek out media that reinforces what they believe. What difference does it make how much a person pays attention, in that case?
That's why I don't buy this idea that Twitter is somehow crucial to the national narrative. There is no national narrative. If there were, Twitter would just ban all conservatives and be done with it, they'd own the narrative. They can't do that, not because of some threat of more toothless regulation, but because like all talent agents and aggregators, they are playing a delicate game. They can't have people leaving en mass, if they did it would break the perception that Twitter is this important place for discussion. Because that's all it is; a perception.
Due Process for End Users Now
It's amazing. As soon as Trump rode that escalator and described the centerpieces of his campaign, many of us knew he would be the next president. As soon as Trump was elected the first time, we all knew that the summer of 2020 would feature DNC-supported mass rioting, and that September-October 2020 would see massive censorship on social media sites.
The fact these social media companies keep banning conservatives/Republicans while giving violent leftists a free pass to say and do whatever they want, makes me believe they’re are fully complicit in, and actively supporting Antifa/radical terrorism. These companies should be treated no differently than China - they are hostile combatants, directly working to undermine our country’s laws and protections. Shut them down now!
REPEAL Section 230
IG = Facebook.
Imagine if the fbi took antifa violence half as seriously as they take mythical white supremacists
I think you meant Instagram.
NOPE, last night HE was complaining about the IG ban. NOW Twitter has banned him. Here is the link to his account. https://twitter.com/TeamSaveAmerica/
Wow..
They are slow to learn.
We have turned our social life and views over to these retards.
Twitter and Instagram are racists!
Now it’s our turn to daily accuse.
This is the first step towards fascism. No joke. Knock a black man's teeth out in the name of ending racism and ban him from social media so he can't complain about it.
This. Right. Here.
The video. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wUK-FiZDYcU
Is he on Parler or Gab?
I can't find him on Gab. I don't have parlor
The employees are doing this because they think they can hide behind their company name. We need to end that anonymity
Get a Fricken Lawyer and get paid. 230 needs a legal challenge and this is made for TV, Sorry for your pain and suffering but need to be compensated TREMENDOUSLY. There are lots of lawyers that will take your case. You know which ones.
Store up, Arm up, Standby (but not for very much longer)
WWG1WGA
Good. Keep doing it more and more Big T. Turn it up to 11 please.
All i want for christmas and shit
Private entities that serve the public should be regulated as public entities.
Clear election meddling. Why ban his account?
Trump needs to go scorched earth on these fuckers Nov 4th. Complete gloves off and knock their fucking teeth out.