The only way these people are able to sleep at night is on a pile of money. Time for 65 million Americans to make that mattress a little thinner by pulling back their money and advertising revenue. You need to maintain a voice on some of these platforms unfortunately but you have no excuse not to boycott spying operations like Instagram and Facebook as a shot across the bow to the tech companies.
Why do you "need to maintain a voice on these platforms"? I have never understood this reasoning. Aside from being simply untrue if taken at face value (no one needs to be on Twitter. You won't die. I promise), it seems like circular logic to me. We want to reduce the influence of Twitter, but I can't get off Twitter because reasons, which removes the most effective means you have of reducing the influence of Twitter.
Maybe I don't get it, though. Why do you have to have this presence on platforms that hate you?
Twitter is an important platform to defend and promote your views, as well as interact with others. Facebook is more about you bitching to family and friends, annoying them. Instagram is even more useless, as it largely is a place to look at photos of celebrities whoring themselves out and laughably trying to interact with them.
You can cut off Facebook, IG, Netflix, and TikTok with ease. Twitter, YouTube, and Amazon are more difficult for all but the monk-class of conservatives.
The only way these people are able to sleep at night is on a pile of money. Time for 65 million Americans to make that mattress a little thinner by pulling back their money and advertising revenue. You need to maintain a voice on some of these platforms unfortunately but you have no excuse not to boycott spying operations like Instagram and Facebook as a shot across the bow to the tech companies.
Why do you "need to maintain a voice on these platforms"? I have never understood this reasoning. Aside from being simply untrue if taken at face value (no one needs to be on Twitter. You won't die. I promise), it seems like circular logic to me. We want to reduce the influence of Twitter, but I can't get off Twitter because reasons, which removes the most effective means you have of reducing the influence of Twitter.
Maybe I don't get it, though. Why do you have to have this presence on platforms that hate you?
Twitter is an important platform to defend and promote your views, as well as interact with others. Facebook is more about you bitching to family and friends, annoying them. Instagram is even more useless, as it largely is a place to look at photos of celebrities whoring themselves out and laughably trying to interact with them.
You can cut off Facebook, IG, Netflix, and TikTok with ease. Twitter, YouTube, and Amazon are more difficult for all but the monk-class of conservatives.