Not saying it's perfect. Nothing is. Buddhism and Hinduism tackle more thoroughly the persistent "monkey mind" phenomenon, without adding more pisdinke neurosis to the equation. And yet. And yet... It's ours,, more or less, to improve a we see fit.
Christianity has been intricately intertwined with the history and formation of Western society. Throughout its long history, the Church has been a major source of social services like schooling and medical care; an inspiration for art, culture and philosophy; and an influential player in politics and religion. In various ways it has sought to affect Western attitudes towards vice and virtue in diverse fields. Festivals like Easter and Christmas are marked as public holidays; the Gregorian Calendar has been adopted internationally as the civil calendar; and the calendar itself is measured from the date of Jesus's birth.
The cultural influence of the Church has been vast. Church scholars preserved literacy in Western Europe following the Fall of the Western Roman Empire.[1] During the Middle Ages, the Church rose to replace the Roman Empire as the unifying force in Europe. The medieval cathedrals remain among the most iconic architectural feats produced by Western civilization. Many of Europe's universities were also founded by the church at that time. Many historians state that universities and cathedral schools were a continuation of the interest in learning promoted by monasteries. The university is generally regarded[3][4] as an institution that has its origin in the Medieval Christian setting, born from Cathedral schools. The Reformation brought an end to religious unity in the West, but the Renaissance masterpieces produced by Catholic artists like Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and Raphael remain among the most celebrated works of art ever produced. Similarly, Christian sacred music by composers like Pachelbel, Vivaldi, Bach, Handel, Mozart, Haydn, Beethoven, Mendelssohn, Liszt, and Verdi is among the most admired classical music in the Western canon.
The Bible and Christian theology have also strongly influenced Western philosophers and political activists. The teachings of Jesus, such as the Parable of the Good Samaritan, are among the most important sources of modern notions of human rights and the welfare commonly provided by governments in the West. Long-held Christian teachings on sexuality, marriage, and family life have also been influential and controversial in recent times. Christianity played a role in ending practices such as human sacrifice,[6] infanticide and polygamy.[7]:309 Christianity in general affected the status of women by condemning marital infidelity, divorce, incest, polygamy, birth control, infanticide (female infants were more likely to be killed), and abortion.[8]:104 While official Church teaching[9]:61 considers women and men to be complementary (equal and different), some modern "advocates of ordination of women and other feminists" argue that teachings attributed to St. Paul and those of the Fathers of the Church and Scholastic theologians advanced the notion of a divinely ordained female inferiority.×Nevertheless, women have played prominent roles in Western history through and as part of the church, particularly in education and healthcare, but also as influential theologians and mystics.
Christians have made a myriad contributions to human progress in a broad and diverse range of fields, both historically and in modern times, including the science and technology,[11][12][13][14][15] medicine,[16] fine arts and architecture,[17][18][19] politics, literatures,[19] Music,[19] philanthropy, philosophy,[20][21][22]:15 ethics,[23] theatre and business.[24][25][18][26] According to 100 Years of Nobel Prizes a review of Nobel prizes award between 1901 and 2000 reveals that (65.4%) of Nobel Prizes Laureates, have identified Christianity in its various forms as their religious preference.[27] Eastern Christians (particularly Nestorian Christians) have also contributed to the Arab Islamic Civilization during the Ummayad and the Abbasid periods by translating works of Greek philosophers to Syriac and afterwards to Arabic.[28][29][30] They also excelled in philosophy, science, theology and medicine.[31][32]
Common criticisms of Christianity include oppression of women, condemnation of homosexuality, colonialism, and various other cases of violence. Christian ideas have been used both to support and end slavery as an institution. Criticism of Christianity has come from the different religious and non-religious groups around the world, some of whom were themselves Christians.
This article is intellectually dishonest. It cannibalizes the achievements of men who happened to be Christians, and claims that those achievements are a result of the men's Christianity.
That is not an argument. It's like claiming that Islam gave us our numeric system only because Arab men, who happened to be Muslim, introduced it.
In both cases, you need to ask: where in the religious philosophy does it push for science?
In the Bible there isn't a single word in favor of intelligence, freedom of speech, or the scientific method (which is testing things instead of believing in dogmas).
Your post is intellectually bankrupt. You're judging the past through modern context and lack either imagination or desire to seek the truth and admit that Christianity created colleges, saved female daughters from rape, bigamy, sacrifice (by being left out in the woods because people didn't want daughters) etc, etc and on and on.
ALL RIGHT THERE IN THE ARTICLE.
Color me surprised that you jumped right over ALL THAT and zoomed right in to the part you disagree with...then label the entire article "dishonest."
PROJECTION.
Oxford University, a Christian college, older than heart-extracting Aztec Pyramids. Plus, in my utmost opinion, you smell like ass. Boo!
This thread is not about whether Christianity was a positive contribution to humanity. It is only about science. So spare me the bullshit about saving women from rape.
Besides that there's a very big difference between a university and science, as any non-binary gender fluid graduate in gender studies will be happy to explain to you, the fact is that clerics were the only (or almost the only) literate people at the time.
So what religious people, or clerics, did, has to be separated from the religious ideology.
Take for instance Giordano Bruno. He was a friar. He discovered science stuff. That proves your point, you think?
It proves mine, as he was fucking murdered by the Church for the accusation of not respecting the religious dogma.
I made the motherfucking thread. I'll tell you what it's about. It's about you. Smelling like a filthy, unwashed asshole. And not reading the post before puffing yourself up and parading around with shit on your feet. Now fuck off, Uber Atheist idiot.
"Duuu Duuu, do you believe in evolution???"
"Hurt hurrr, Christianity is no science!! Hurgghgggh"
Yeah, genius. I believe in evolution. That's why I get a flu shot... Oh, wait, you mean HUMAN evolution. Gee, do you need me to make your argument for you? :D Fuckwit.
When normal people make a thread, they invite open discussion. But it seems that you're unable to deal with different opinions. Perhaps you haven't done your dilating today? I know it's a chore, but it's necessary to be a strong proud and beautiful woman. Now take your metal rod and get to it.
If you say you believe in evolution, to which religion is vehemently opposed, you're admitting that religion is wrong. And science developed outside of it.
Not really. Try reading the article in a post instead of just breathlessly vomiting a response to a title and repeating stale, stale, stale, Atgeism 101cliches, pede. Also, quit judging the past by modern standards. Oxford U.... (who invented that?).....older than Aztec pyramids.
We can sit lobbing shitty, stupid, old-ass, dumbfuck gotcha questions at each other all day. What is this, junior high atheist debate club? Fucking at least try to put an interesting spin on the topic. Fuck me. And anyways, TRUMP 2020. Don't like a post? Guess what, genius.... here comes twenty more a minute, you'll probably like one of those better.
Religious nutjobs condemned the work of Darwin. So either you reject the work of Darwin, or you must admit that religion is anti-science at least on this topic.
It's exactly like that. Religion is based on immutable dogmas and faith, science is based on observations. For each individual issue, it is a black and white thing.
You still haven't told me if you believe in evolution.
Not saying it's perfect. Nothing is. Buddhism and Hinduism tackle more thoroughly the persistent "monkey mind" phenomenon, without adding more pisdinke neurosis to the equation. And yet. And yet... It's ours,, more or less, to improve a we see fit.
This article is intellectually dishonest. It cannibalizes the achievements of men who happened to be Christians, and claims that those achievements are a result of the men's Christianity.
That is not an argument. It's like claiming that Islam gave us our numeric system only because Arab men, who happened to be Muslim, introduced it.
In both cases, you need to ask: where in the religious philosophy does it push for science?
In the Bible there isn't a single word in favor of intelligence, freedom of speech, or the scientific method (which is testing things instead of believing in dogmas).
Found the uptight liberal.
Your post is intellectually bankrupt. You're judging the past through modern context and lack either imagination or desire to seek the truth and admit that Christianity created colleges, saved female daughters from rape, bigamy, sacrifice (by being left out in the woods because people didn't want daughters) etc, etc and on and on.
ALL RIGHT THERE IN THE ARTICLE.
Color me surprised that you jumped right over ALL THAT and zoomed right in to the part you disagree with...then label the entire article "dishonest."
Oxford University, a Christian college, older than heart-extracting Aztec Pyramids. Plus, in my utmost opinion, you smell like ass. Boo!
Moving the goal post, I see.
This thread is not about whether Christianity was a positive contribution to humanity. It is only about science. So spare me the bullshit about saving women from rape.
Besides that there's a very big difference between a university and science, as any non-binary gender fluid graduate in gender studies will be happy to explain to you, the fact is that clerics were the only (or almost the only) literate people at the time. So what religious people, or clerics, did, has to be separated from the religious ideology.
Take for instance Giordano Bruno. He was a friar. He discovered science stuff. That proves your point, you think? It proves mine, as he was fucking murdered by the Church for the accusation of not respecting the religious dogma.
I made the motherfucking thread. I'll tell you what it's about. It's about you. Smelling like a filthy, unwashed asshole. And not reading the post before puffing yourself up and parading around with shit on your feet. Now fuck off, Uber Atheist idiot.
"Duuu Duuu, do you believe in evolution???"
"Hurt hurrr, Christianity is no science!! Hurgghgggh"
Yeah, genius. I believe in evolution. That's why I get a flu shot... Oh, wait, you mean HUMAN evolution. Gee, do you need me to make your argument for you? :D Fuckwit.
When normal people make a thread, they invite open discussion. But it seems that you're unable to deal with different opinions. Perhaps you haven't done your dilating today? I know it's a chore, but it's necessary to be a strong proud and beautiful woman. Now take your metal rod and get to it.
If you say you believe in evolution, to which religion is vehemently opposed, you're admitting that religion is wrong. And science developed outside of it.
So you just got owned in your own thread.
Dude what are you, a 14 year old youtube atheist? Just stop.
Can't handle my arguments, eh?
That's ridiculous, OP. The Church was imprisoning, torturing, and burning alive people for daring to say that the earth revolves around the sun.
Christianity is not science. Christianity, like all the other religions, has held back human progress.
Do you even believe in dinosaurs?
Not really. Try reading the article in a post instead of just breathlessly vomiting a response to a title and repeating stale, stale, stale, Atgeism 101cliches, pede. Also, quit judging the past by modern standards. Oxford U.... (who invented that?).....older than Aztec pyramids.
I'm asking you a question.
Do you believe in dinosaurs?
Do you believe that 2 of every animal in the planet were living within walking distance from Noah's house?
Jesus Christ.
Do you believe in evolution?
Do you know which monk discovered genetics?
We can sit lobbing shitty, stupid, old-ass, dumbfuck gotcha questions at each other all day. What is this, junior high atheist debate club? Fucking at least try to put an interesting spin on the topic. Fuck me. And anyways, TRUMP 2020. Don't like a post? Guess what, genius.... here comes twenty more a minute, you'll probably like one of those better.
Take the sand off your vagina.
Religious nutjobs condemned the work of Darwin. So either you reject the work of Darwin, or you must admit that religion is anti-science at least on this topic.
Typical, simple, black-white mindset.
"You're either for science or for religion!!!! Dooohooooohoooo!" Good luck with your life, you simplistic asshole. Lol
It's exactly like that. Religion is based on immutable dogmas and faith, science is based on observations. For each individual issue, it is a black and white thing.
You still haven't told me if you believe in evolution.
What, are you ashamed to say it?