5108
Comments (286)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
5
gorillachannel 5 points ago +6 / -1

The first lady had an illustrious career as a super model and clearly does not consider the work she did disrespectful. It was her choice.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
1
gorillachannel 1 point ago +1 / -0

There must be some other photos I don't know about. I cannot imagine that anyone would describe photos from numerous paid professional photoshoots as "stolen nudes".

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
0
gorillachannel 0 points ago +2 / -2

I am literally a professional photographer who works in precisely this genre. The licensing has nothing to do with the model. The model is paid for her work and has no copyright on the images. Whoever publishes the images must either have the copyright, license to use, or perhaps they will be liable to be sued by the copyright owner, who in no case is going to be Melania Trump. Saying it's "illegal" to publish is retarded. It is in the worst case merely a violation of some other company's copyright.

There is nothing "gross" about having a career as a professional model, nor is nudity "gross". Have you considered that your values are not the same as those of the first lady? Because she voluntarily, and for significant compensation, participated in the creation of these images. By no stretch of the imagination it is possible for these to exist without her complete and total approval.

1
thuggishruggishtrump 1 point ago +2 / -1

Lol I'm willing to bet money she doesn't give a shit, stop white knighting.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
1
thuggishruggishtrump 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ahhh now I get it..lmao

1
christianknight 1 point ago +2 / -1

That explains everything