Tl;dr - 230 was expanded to help Big Tech after the Prodigy case. They've bought off all the think tank lawyers to say that publisher vs platform doesn't exist.

Thomas just wrote an independent ruling (as he often does) hinting at how to beat them. Claim unjust enrichment: platforms promise free speech, then reneg at random but continue to profit from the traffic.

This is illegal under tort law and represents their Achilles heel.

Discussion lasts 41-1:14.