Does the algorithm detect the links only, or also photos?
I wonder if small changes to the bitmap would still be detected.
Another idea is preemptive responses to the fake fact checks within the photo.
Tucker ran the video of him being punched in the mouth, and it’s aftermath. The ‘No basis in fact’ fist punch made it crystal clear to everyone that this really happened. These people are not even trying to hide their blatant censorship. Tucker should have him on his show as a guest.
Best of luck. I've been really interested in this guy.
There's video of him on YT in a couple of cities standing up against BLM/Antifa
(I just looked these up yesterday by typing in Philip Anderson. They were at the top. just did the same right now and it was scrubbed from the search results. I added in some additional search terms and got them, but what the fuck man)
He has a website: TeamSaveAmerica.com but there isn't much info on there, just a bunch of social media links.
Here's video of the day in question before he was attacked. Hundreds of black bloc members screaming and throwing bottles and glass at him from behind a barricade
Sorry, I should've added that. I already did my part there too.
he's had an outpouring of support, and duly deserved. I dont even care if he keeps the extra funds for himself, but the latest update there is that he plans to carry on his protest.
I'm looking for it now, but from the teamsaveamerica site I found my way down a twitter hole that led me to a video from a couple of months ago where he expressed that he was thinking of giving up because he would get all of this armchair activist support online and then nobody would show up to stand against the mobs.
So he holds a peace rally in San Fran. He gets his teeth knocked out. Then Instagram censors him. Then Twitter censors him!!!!!
They guy can't catch a break. That is severely un-personing him.
Wait, they're censoring it with unrelated bullshit?
They deleted his accounts. Then they are saying that the post has no basis in fact.
it's false because it's not proven to be true. And they removed the ways to prove it.
They didn't call is unlikely, or suspicious. They are saying FALSE.
No, I mean the censorship has nothing to do with the photo. They just attached claims that literally have nothing to do with the picture.
Where is that depicted?
Ah, this is from my FB page. They are just showing those as examples of their fact checking. It is quite misleading....
We literally have him on video getting beaten up by antifa. Fuck social media and all the fagets that run it
BINGO!
You see bigot, it's false because antifa had a reason to attack him. He was not advocating communism. That's it that's the reason.... /s
It's prolly because I called the ANTIFA.
I'm sure that it would have been allowed if I had called the White Supremacists. I might try it and see if it gets thru.
Even if it wasn’t true, what the fuck, is it against terms of service to lie on the internet now?
When it hurts the left or Democrats, of course it is. Where have you been last 3 years?
Does the algorithm detect the links only, or also photos?
I wonder if small changes to the bitmap would still be detected.
Another idea is preemptive responses to the fake fact checks within the photo.
My original post was the TWITTER link.
Tucker ran the video of him being punched in the mouth, and it’s aftermath. The ‘No basis in fact’ fist punch made it crystal clear to everyone that this really happened. These people are not even trying to hide their blatant censorship. Tucker should have him on his show as a guest.
I'll see if I can get this to Tucker.
Best of luck. I've been really interested in this guy.
There's video of him on YT in a couple of cities standing up against BLM/Antifa
(I just looked these up yesterday by typing in Philip Anderson. They were at the top. just did the same right now and it was scrubbed from the search results. I added in some additional search terms and got them, but what the fuck man)
Here he is in portland standing between the mob and the courthouse https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9j0kaTAC6zw&t=3s
Here he is (Im not certain where) giving an interview (unfortunately being stream recorded by some goofball canadian) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaRzX5FidBI&t=20s
Here he is making his statement right before Twitter and Instagram banned him (unfortunately being rebutted by some piggy boy beta slob) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJFCy3qrczk&t=2s
He has a website: TeamSaveAmerica.com but there isn't much info on there, just a bunch of social media links.
Here's video of the day in question before he was attacked. Hundreds of black bloc members screaming and throwing bottles and glass at him from behind a barricade
https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1mrGmEkWrrDGy?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1317556987261906945%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3%2Ccontainerclick_1&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fpublish.twitter.com%2F%3Fquery%3Dhttps3A2F2Ftwitter.com2FVivaLaHaley32Fstatus2F1317556987261906945widget%3DTweet
WOW, good research.
Here is his GoFundMe: https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-philip-anderson-fix-his-teeth
And here is the guy managing the GoFundMe for him: https://twitter.com/AdamCrigler
Sorry, I should've added that. I already did my part there too. he's had an outpouring of support, and duly deserved. I dont even care if he keeps the extra funds for himself, but the latest update there is that he plans to carry on his protest.
I'm looking for it now, but from the teamsaveamerica site I found my way down a twitter hole that led me to a video from a couple of months ago where he expressed that he was thinking of giving up because he would get all of this armchair activist support online and then nobody would show up to stand against the mobs.
Our champions are getting eaten alive out there.
Wow... I wish that I could go stand up with him.
Black Lives Matter?
This guy not only lost his TEETH, but his VOICE.