EDIT: Tapping out now!!! Thanks for the ride, boys!
Please reach out anytime. I'm always looking for allies or ways to help build the conservative ecosphere in the media and tech!!
--Ken
Before they were published in the NY Post, I was helping that Delaware computer shop whistleblower get his story out.
I had dozens of the emails and many conversations with him. The press is smearing him, but he’s a true patriot and I believe him 100%.
Ask away!
My background …
I ran Fox News . com for over a decade and Roger Ailes was my mentor for 30 years.
Two years ago I did an AMA at T_D when I was trying to establish a non-biased news outlet.
I got smeared by the media and banned from Facebook w/ 3.4 million followers because anything right-of-center is blasted as disinformation.
Now, I’m not about reporting news, but punching back via the Media Action Network. It’s a newsletter driven group — just over 70k subscribers now — where we sometimes protect the media’s victims, and sometimes expose the fake “objectivity” with the long-term work to build up conservative outlets.
This & that
• I’ve currently been subpoenaed in two of the lawsuits against Fox regarding the Seth Rich story, which was published after I left. Crazy stuff.
• I’m now following the advice of my late friend Andrew Breitbart and taking the fight upstream. If we don’t change the media, we’re screwed.
• At Fox, I helped free our kidnapped victims in Gaza, blocked the Stormy Daniels story and publicly defended Fox victims of “sexual McCarthyism”.
• I hate the dishonest media with a white-hot passion.
Media Action Network: website, newsletter archive, Parler, Twitter
Ken LaCorte: Twitter, Parler, thedonald.win
My story on Hunter’s Burisma emails (29 downloadable there)
It's super hard to answer that question, but it's a great one.
For the most part, they don't need anything secret at all. Look at how many "retired CIA/NSA/FBI analysts" are on all of the networks. They're blatant about it.
Or those "50 intelligence analysts" who signed a propaganda letter implying, with ZERO anything, that the leaked emails were kinda-sorta like something the Russians would do. It was shameful.
There's only one time that I experienced a state-level operation, actually shortly after I'd left Fox.
Someone (FBI? CIA? GRU?) put a long-time source into Fox. Someone who gave us verifiable stories through a long period of time.
Later, he tried to get Fox to publish some forged FBI documents spreading the Seth Rich murder conspiracy, after FoxNews.com had already published the now-infamous one.
It's a long story, but crazy as hell.
So to be clear, you were certain that this "source" was put there to manipulate you guys? I assume to discredit the whole network. To attack it's credibility in a state level type attack? If that's the case why not release this fake source's name?
Isn't the problem in journalism that many organizations protect people like this, who lie, who fabricate, who maliciously try to get news outlets destroyed by giving them forgeries?