38
posted ago by antideerg ago by antideerg +39 / -1

So, are we allowed to talk about Q here?

Comments (16)
sorted by:
8
deleted 8 points ago +10 / -2
4
culverit 4 points ago +4 / -0

I already had a comment that was a bit controversial but entirely objective deleted. Not trying to undermine this place but that did feel a little bad.

2
ObamasPinkSock 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes and no.

I follow Q and keep an open mind, however this platform does have rules about racism, which makes it absolutely non-free-speech, given how subjective that term is and how many facts are racist.

I don't mind though because this platform has ENORMOUS power to help in the 2020 election by providing normies with a somewhat safe space to learn the truth about President Trump.

If people want to be red pilled about "the enemy" who owns and controls our mainstream media and central bank, then they can visit voat.co

3
ObamasPinkSock 3 points ago +4 / -1

Good question.

I hope the mods let us know.

I'll post some "In Pursuit Of Truth" videos soon to see if they get removed.

3
Ringtailed_kazoo 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't understand what people have against Q. The site merely raises issues (usually in the form of questions) and asks people to think for themselves and to dig and research yourself for more facts. Q never asks anything else of it's readers - ie, no financial support, no sign up for personal info, etc. Like any site, if you don't like it, don't go there... but don't get on the those of us who enjoy, or who are at least intrigued by it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
FaddyMcSaddy 1 point ago +2 / -1

Same mods? I admit they did a pretty good job smacking the cuck posters down for the amount of traffic.

1
_deleted_ 1 point ago +4 / -3

I really hope this doesn't turn into a Q site. There's already platforms for that.

Look, I still follow Q. I read the Q proofs (BTW, they're not proofs, they're evidence). It doesn't matter. Something doesn't sit right with me about someone who claims "oh I'm going to be wrong... ON PURPOSE!" Effectively future proofing any mistakes they make. Q has made flat out false statements, not only about events, but specific technology claims and advice he gave to 'patriots'. Hard pass.

I didn't vote for Q. I'm not going to vote for Q. I don't believe Q is who he (they) claims to be, and even if I did, we don't have their identity. I'm not putting stock into a faceless stranger. I've been on the internet too fucking long to fall for shit like this.

I still follow Q out of morbid curiosity, but I can't bring myself to take it seriously.

I'm here for Donald J. Trump.

1
MusicToMyEars 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not to sound too much like an idiot, but my first reaction was “you mean Q from Star Trek Next Gen?!” One of my favorite characters. Mischievous, all powerful, both curious and condescending, and ultimately just a loner looking for companionship and playful distractions. Parallels to the real guy...? (Sorry, just lightening the mood a bit).

Kudos to the mods, but I’m a free speech guy. The mods need to keep this site from being blacklisted for racist comments or fake news, but that’s a slippery slope. Truth should never be censored. Perhaps a tag could be employed for borderline nonPC comments, and a filter to protect viewers that are “sensitive” and don’t want to be exposed? (Although I realize the mods want to protect the site, etc.)

0
GGRain 0 points ago +4 / -4

You mean Q who was barely right in anything?

5
antideerg [S] 5 points ago +6 / -1

You have to look at Q as a military operation. if the Q researchers could understand the plan than the deepstate could too. There are many Q proofs.. and the whole Qanon thing is absolutely something Trump would do.

4
DarthJoshiahis 4 points ago +5 / -1

Concur... it’s just few of us have the patience to swim through the disinformation.... I remember the whole “Declass brings the house down...” misinformation campaign... it my foolish belief in it kinda pissed me off

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
-1
_deleted_ -1 points ago +2 / -3

That's not how technology works.

Edit: For clarity, because your downvote tells me I hurt your feelings for challenging your worldview... any nitwit with a laptop can obfuscate their identity and location with any number of free or paid services in seconds. I could be sitting in a police station making online threats over their wifi, and they wouldn't be able to find me. It's really that fucking simple. So the specific argument of "if it was just a normal person, we would know who he is..." is blown out of the water. Sorry that hurts your fee-fees.

0
ChilledCovfefe 0 points ago +3 / -3

Q is fake but yes, this is America and we have free speech

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3