That was an insiders' theory for a long time. It hit the mainstream when Americans woke to the reality of our future under the Fed unless some things changed. That happened in the 80's around the time of Ronald Reagan. Then, of course, Ron Paul blew the lid off. Up until that time, we all knew about JFK and his hard money, but just a few, such as Harry Browne, ('70's) were public about it -- writing, speaking, etc. -- pre-internet. Now, the theory the reason JFK was murdered was on account of his monetary beliefs and actions has been gaining traction. I can't say one way or the other, but recent disclosures (and events) sure do add to support of this theory. I don't know if this is the place to list them, but I'll make an effort. My opinion only. 1) The Federal Reserve Banking System is increasingly seen as a division of international central banking, both global in scope and ancient in that the Empires of the Mediterranean have been raking in the money for centuries and have it stashed in Switzerland. Even the relatively recent British Empire is thought to have been under control of the ancient powers. 2) These ancient powers see no reason a nation such as America should be permitted to continue, especially to continue as the #1 military power, (which caught everyone by surprise.) They also agree that there is no way this power can be entrusted to the American voter and American politicians. Looking around, we can see why they feel this way. Not to mention the ax that royalty and world religion has to grind. 3) Recently, we are surprised to learn that so-called Intelligence Agencies operate outside authority (which we knew) and co-operate internationally. This is all well and good, until bad apples get into positions of authority in National Intelligence. This is important because these are the people typically associated with assassination. ...............................................
In conclusion, the argument goes that ancient powers (bloodlines, empires, armies) using the usual suspects up front as agents -- financiers, covert government special operations, militant and deceptive religious orders, subversion and regime change specialists -- seek to take out America, infiltrating and controlling key national elements, such as the currency and government expenditures. JFK was a bit of a wild card. As a Roman Catholic, he'd be expected to jump right on board the New World Order. But, in many ways, he was not acting that way. These are a few of the reasons people are saying JFK posed a threat to the global powers who, not incidentally, were on something of a roll from the Civil War to the post WWII era.
I don't agree, speaking as one who experienced the America before JFK/LBJ, during, and after.
Is there any truth to the theory that he was killed because he wanted to shut down the bankers?
That was an insiders' theory for a long time. It hit the mainstream when Americans woke to the reality of our future under the Fed unless some things changed. That happened in the 80's around the time of Ronald Reagan. Then, of course, Ron Paul blew the lid off. Up until that time, we all knew about JFK and his hard money, but just a few, such as Harry Browne, ('70's) were public about it -- writing, speaking, etc. -- pre-internet. Now, the theory the reason JFK was murdered was on account of his monetary beliefs and actions has been gaining traction. I can't say one way or the other, but recent disclosures (and events) sure do add to support of this theory. I don't know if this is the place to list them, but I'll make an effort. My opinion only. 1) The Federal Reserve Banking System is increasingly seen as a division of international central banking, both global in scope and ancient in that the Empires of the Mediterranean have been raking in the money for centuries and have it stashed in Switzerland. Even the relatively recent British Empire is thought to have been under control of the ancient powers. 2) These ancient powers see no reason a nation such as America should be permitted to continue, especially to continue as the #1 military power, (which caught everyone by surprise.) They also agree that there is no way this power can be entrusted to the American voter and American politicians. Looking around, we can see why they feel this way. Not to mention the ax that royalty and world religion has to grind. 3) Recently, we are surprised to learn that so-called Intelligence Agencies operate outside authority (which we knew) and co-operate internationally. This is all well and good, until bad apples get into positions of authority in National Intelligence. This is important because these are the people typically associated with assassination. ............................................... In conclusion, the argument goes that ancient powers (bloodlines, empires, armies) using the usual suspects up front as agents -- financiers, covert government special operations, militant and deceptive religious orders, subversion and regime change specialists -- seek to take out America, infiltrating and controlling key national elements, such as the currency and government expenditures. JFK was a bit of a wild card. As a Roman Catholic, he'd be expected to jump right on board the New World Order. But, in many ways, he was not acting that way. These are a few of the reasons people are saying JFK posed a threat to the global powers who, not incidentally, were on something of a roll from the Civil War to the post WWII era.
So, does that sound to you the ravings of a madman? No need to be polite.
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/67239/how-the-kennedys-scammed-played-black-america/