Yep......and we told them to suck a dick!!!!! Eric Ciaramella needs to answer to the American people and testify before Congress. Since when do you get to fuck with 350 MILLION people, their ELECTIONS, their WAY OF LIFE and then just claim some bullshit anonymity????? Answer for your accusations, Eric. It's only in our Bill of Rights. The 6th Amendment, Eric.....for the next time you want to cast false accusations. The Congressional Witchhunt is now claiming "Bribary" not "Quid Pro Joe"....well, Bribary, that's a CRIMINAL accusation....an accused criminal is allowed to be CONFRONTED by his accusers. And have counsel. Let's do this, Eric.
Article reads like it was written by a leftist. What’s up, Washington Times?
How about mentioning that the law affords no anonymity to IC whistleblowers, except that the ICIG shall not name them?
Everyone else is just agreeing on a conspiracy of silence that prevents accountability.
Eric Ciaramella is the whisleblower’s name and he is a noted partisan. His motivations deserve exposure and he needs to be questioned. The idea that his safety is threatened by naming him is laughable. He’s just another small slithering snake in the DC swamp.
Yep......and we told them to suck a dick!!!!! Eric Ciaramella needs to answer to the American people and testify before Congress. Since when do you get to fuck with 350 MILLION people, their ELECTIONS, their WAY OF LIFE and then just claim some bullshit anonymity????? Answer for your accusations, Eric. It's only in our Bill of Rights. The 6th Amendment, Eric.....for the next time you want to cast false accusations. The Congressional Witchhunt is now claiming "Bribary" not "Quid Pro Joe"....well, Bribary, that's a CRIMINAL accusation....an accused criminal is allowed to be CONFRONTED by his accusers. And have counsel. Let's do this, Eric.
1,000 upvotes in my brain.
One the internets propped up propaganda tools*
They could have mentioned the new site. What crappy journalism
Article reads like it was written by a leftist. What’s up, Washington Times?
How about mentioning that the law affords no anonymity to IC whistleblowers, except that the ICIG shall not name them?
Everyone else is just agreeing on a conspiracy of silence that prevents accountability.
Eric Ciaramella is the whisleblower’s name and he is a noted partisan. His motivations deserve exposure and he needs to be questioned. The idea that his safety is threatened by naming him is laughable. He’s just another small slithering snake in the DC swamp.