It can be submitted. But I think I should have went a little deeper with my thought: We need to be able to submit evidence that is going to get a judge to rule in our favor. Unfortunately, that's a high bar. Most judges are normies or bought and paid off... all the more reason why the evidence needs to be clear, concise, and convincing enough to establish the fact that a crime and/or conspiracy has occurred, the likes of which our Country has never seen.

That's the thing a ton of people on TD aren't getting. We are not here to convince each other what happened. We all know what happened. Again, our evidence needs to be bullet proof enough to convince people who strictly think in evidentiary procedure to rule in our favor.

All in all, what I take issue with most is people on TD who go around, don't contribute, and fling insults to others in the community because they are trying to have an honest discourse. Sometimes there is info and situations in life we don't like; that's life. Hearing something you don't like doesn't mean you automatically divert to ad hominems... as far as I'm concerned, that's what the left does, and I won't participate in that no matter which side it comes from. If I won't tolerate it from one side, I'm not going to tolerate it on the other. I'm a strong Conservative first and foremost and this means I generally try to suppress my emotional response, and leave my thinking to fact and reason.

It can be submitted. But I think I should have went a little deeper with my thought: We need to be able to submit evidence that is going to get a judge to rule in our favor. Unfortunately, that's a high bar. Most judges are normies or bought and paid off... all the more reason why the evidence needs to be clear, concise, and convincing enough to establish the fact that a crime and/or conspiracy has occurred, the likes of which our Country has never seen.

That's the thing a ton of people on TD aren't getting. We are not here to convince each other what happened. We all know what happened. Again, our evidence needs to be bullet proof enough to convince people who strictly think in evidentiary procedure to rule in our favor.

All in all, what I take issue with most is people on TD who go around, don't contribute, and fling insults to others in the community because they are trying to have an honest discourse. Sometimes there is info and situations in life we don't like. That's life.