Obviously the SCOTUS will have to make a ruling. My point was that they won't be able to throw out the election results. The best they can do is kick it to the house for us.

My apologies if I misworded that, but I am agreeing with you. My response was to point out that even in our best win scenario, SCOTUS isn't the final stop, which was implied by your earlier post.

I thought you were under the impression this fight ends at SCOTUS.

There are two outcomes. Either scotus shrugs, and it ends there, or they invalidate results AND send it to the house.

There is no situation in which scotus directly crowns a king here. They either leave it alone or send it along.

Obviously the SCOTUS will have to make a ruling. My point was that they won't be able to throw out the election results. The best they can do is kick it to the house for us.

My apologies if I misworded that, but I am agreeing with you. My response was to point out that even in our best win scenario, SCOTUS isn't the final stop, which was implied by your earlier post.

I thought you were under the impression this fight ends at SCOTUS.

There are two outcomes. Either scotus shrugs, and it ends there, or they invalidate results AND send it to the house.

There is no situation in which scotus rules a winner. They either leave things be, or they push it to the house.