Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

This is where i disagree with Rudy - do not argue this was coordinated - you will never find the proof of that, and don't argue what you cannot prove. I would argue that this is long standing election fraud with mail in ballots that these cities have been doing for decades, only this year the numbers of mail in ballots were amplified greatly, allowing the fraud to be massively effective.

edit: to clarify i am speaking specifically of his public facing comments, not his court strategy - if he has kill shot proof of conspiracy then by all means that should be the primary course but until that evidence is ready for public consumption i think what we saw today was very compelling and hard to brush off.

175 days ago
6 score
Reason: None provided.

This is where i disagree with Rudy - do not argue this was coordinated - you will never find the proof of that, and don't argue what you cannot prove. I would argue that this is long standing election fraud with mail in ballots that these cities have been doing for decades, only this year the numbers of mail in ballots were amplified greatly, allowing the fraud to be massively effective.

edit: to clarify i am speaking specifically of his public facing comments, not his court strategy - if he has kill shot proof of conspiracy then by all means that should be the primary course.

175 days ago
6 score
Reason: Original

This is where i disagree with Rudy - do not argue this was coordinated - you will never find the proof of that, and don't argue what you cannot prove. I would argue that this is long standing election fraud with mail in ballots that these cities have been doing for decades, only this year the numbers of mail in ballots were amplified greatly, allowing the fraud to be massively effective.

175 days ago
1 score